PEEK-OPTIMA™ has been considered as an alternative to cobalt chrome in the femoral component of total knee replacements. Whole joint wear simulation studies of both the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints carried out to date have shown an equivalent wear rate of UHMWPE tibial and patella components against PEEK and cobalt chrome (CoCr) femoral components. In this study, the influence of third body wear on UHMWPE-on-PEEK was investigated, tests on UHMWPE-on-CoCr were carried out in parallel to compare PEEK to a conventional femoral component material. Wear simulation was carried out in simple geometry using a 6-station multi-directional pin-on-plate simulator. 5 scratches were created on each PEEK and CoCr plate perpendicular to the direction of the wear test using a diamond stylus to produce scratches with a geometry similar to that observed in retrieved CoCr femoral components. To investigate the influence of scratch lip height on wear, scratches of approximately 1, 2 and 4µm lip height were created. Wear simulation of GUR 1020 UHMWPE pins (conventional, non-sterile) against the plates was carried out for 1 million cycles (MC) using 17g/l bovine serum as a lubricant using kinematic conditions to replicate the average contact pressure and cross-shear in a total knee replacement. Wear of UHMWPE pins was measured gravimetrically and the surface topography of the plates assessed using a contacting Form Talysurf. Wear factors of the pins against the scratched plates were compared to unscratched controls (0µm lip height). Minimum n=3 for each condition and statistical analysis carried out using ANOVA with significance taken at p<0.05.Introduction
Methods
Component alignment and soft tissue constraints are key factors affecting function and implant survival after total knee replacement (TKR). Knee kinematics contribute to knee function whilst soft tissue constraints and component alignment impact polyethylene wear. This study experimentally investigated the effect of soft tissue constraints and component alignment on the kinematics and wear of a TKR. A six station electromechanical ProSim knee simulator was used with the ISO 14243-1:2009 standard force control inputs; axial force, flexion-extension (FE), tibial rotation (TR) torque and anterior-posterior (AP) force. This allowed the kinematics to vary with the test conditions. The soft tissue constraints were simulated using virtual springs. DePuy Sigma XLK fixed bearing TKRs were tested in 25% bovine serum (in 0.04% sodium azide) lubricant. The average output kinematics across 6 stations were found for each test and the peak values compared. The wear rates were calculated over 2 million cycles (MC), the serum was changed every 350,000 cycles and the tibial inserts weighed after every MC. A one way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test was used to compare the kinematics and wear with significance taken at p<0.05. The kinematics and wear rates for three soft tissue conditions were established under ideal alignment (Table 1). The ISO standard springs for a cruciate substituting (CS) and a cruciate retaining (CR) prosthesis were used to represent a knee with a resected ACL and PCL and a knee with a resected ACL respectively. The third spring condition was based on clinical data to represent a “stiff” knee. Three other alignment conditions were then assessed using “stiff” knee springs; 4° varus, 14° rotational mismatch and 10° posterior tibial slope. These alignments were chosen to represent the range found in clinical data. Under ideal alignment the “stiff” knee springs had significantly lower peak AP and TR displacements (0.9mm, 2mm, 2mm and 3.6°, 7.1°, 7.8° for the “stiff”, CR and CS springs respectively) than the other springs (p<0.01). The “stiff” knee spring had a significantly lower wear rate than the CR spring; 1.58 ±1.20mm³/MC compared to 4.71±1.29 mm³/MC (p<0.01). The varus and rotated components had significantly larger peak AP displacements of 2.56mm and 2.42mm respectively, than the ideal and tibial slope fixtures (1.97mm and 0.92mm respectively) (p<0.01). The rotated components had significantly higher internal rotation of 12.2° compared to 4.4°, 3.7° and 3.5° for the tibial slope, varus and ideal components respectively (p<0.01). The ideal and varus components had significantly lower wear than the tibial slope and rotated components (1.58±1.20mm³/MC and 0.15±0.83mm³/MC compared to 8.24±7.72mm³/MC and 5.19±1.12mm³/MC respectively) (p<0.01). This may be due to increased AP and TR displacements with the rotated components and the increased anterior AP displacement with the tibial slope components, resulting in wear on the posterior edge of the tibial insert. Soft tissue constraints and component alignment had a significant effect on the kinematics and wear. Experimental simulation should test a variety of soft tissue and alignment conditions to reflect the range observed clinically and determine causes for early failure. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
PEEK-OPTIMA™ has been considered as an alternative to cobalt chrome in the femoral component of total knee replacements. Wear simulation studies of both the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints carried out to date have shown an equivalent wear rate of UHMWPE tibial and patella components against PEEK and cobalt chrome (CoCr) femoral components implanted under optimal alignment conditions. In this study, fundamental pin-on-plate studies have been carried out to investigate the wear of UHMWPE-on-PEEK under a wider range of contact pressure and cross-shear conditions. The study was carried out in a 6 station multi-axial pin-on-plate reciprocating rig. UHMPWE pins (conventional, non- sterile) were articulated against PEEK-OPTIMA™ plates, initial Ra ∼0.02µm. The lubricant used was 25% bovine serum (17g/l) supplemented with 0.03% sodium azide. The contact pressure and cross-shear ratio conditions were selected to replicate those in total knee replacements and to be comparable to previously reported studies of UHMPWE-on-CoCr tested in the same pin-on-plate simulators. Contact pressures from 2.1 to 25.5MPa were created by changing the diameter of the contact face of the pin, the cross-shear ratios ranged from 0 (uniaxial motion) to 0.18. Wear of the UHMWPE pins was measured gravimetrically and the surface topography of the plates assessed using a contacting Form Talysurf. N=6 was carried out for each condition and statistical analysis carried out using ANOVA with significance taken at p<0.05.Introduction
Methods
The number of young and more active patients requiring total knee replacement (TKR) is increasing. Preclinical evaluation and understanding the long-term failure of TKR is therefore important. Preclinical wear simulation of TKR is usually performed according to the International Standards Organization (ISO) recommendations. Two international standards for preclinical wear simulation of TKRs have been developed so that the anterior-posterior (AP) translation and internal-external (IE) rotation can be driven in either force or displacement control. However, the effects of using different control regimes on the kinematics and wear of the same TKR have not been investigated. The current study investigated the kinematics, contact mechanics and wear performance of a TKR when running under ISO force and displacement control standards using an experimentally validated computational model. Three different ISO control standards were investigated using a size C Sigma curved TKR (DePuy, UK), with moderately cross-linked UHMWPE curved inserts; ISO-14243-3-2004, ISO-14243-3-2014 and ISO- 14243-1-2009. Axial force and flexion-extension angle are common for the three standards. AP and IE motions are displacement controlled in ISO-14243-3-2004 and ISO-14243-3-2014, with the only difference being a reversal of AP polarity between the two standards, and are force controlled in ISO-14243-1-2009. The test setup and soft tissue constraints were defined in accordance with ISO recommendations. The wear model was based on the modification of Archard's law where the wear volume is defined as a function of contact area, sliding distance, cross-shear and contact stress. The simulation framework has been independently validated against experimental wear rates under three different standard and highly demanding daily activities (Abdelgaied et al. 2018).Introduction
Materials/Methods
