Elevated blood cobalt secondary to metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties has been shown to be a risk factor for developing cardiovascular complications including cardiomyopathy. Published case reports document cardiomyopathy in patients with blood cobalt levels as low as 13µg/l. Clinical studies have found conflicting evidence of cobalt-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with MoM hips. The extent of cardiovascular injury, measured by global longitudinal strain (GLS), in patients with elevated blood cobalt levels has not previously been examined.

Sixteen patients with prospectively collected blood cobalt ion levels above 13µg/l were identified and matched with eight patients awaiting hip arthroplasty with no history of cobalt implants. Patients underwent echocardiogram assessment including GLS.

Patients with MoM hip arthroplasties had a mean blood cobalt level of 29µg/l compared to 0.01µg/l in the control group. There was no difference or correlation in EF, left ventricular (LV) end systolic dimension, LV end diastolic dimension, fractional shortening, ventricular wall thickness or E/e’ ratio. However, GLS was significantly reduced in patients with MoM hip arthroplasties compared to those without (−15.2% v −18%, (MoM v control) p= 0.0125). Pearson correlation demonstrated that GLS is significantly correlated with blood cobalt level (r= 0.8742, p=0.0009).

For the first time, this study has demonstrated reduced cardiac function in the presence of normal EF as assessed by GLS in patients with elevated cobalt above 13µg/l. As GLS is a more sensitive measure of systolic function than EF, routine echocardiogram assessment including GLS should be performed in all patients with MoM hip arthroplasties and elevated blood cobalt.

Elevated blood cobalt secondary to metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties has been shown to be a risk factor for developing cardiovascular complications including cardiomyopathy. Published case reports document cardiomyopathy in patients with blood cobalt levels as low as 13µg/l (13ppb, 221nmol/l). Clinical studies have found conflicting evidence of cobalt-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with MoM hips. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an echocardiography measurement known to be more sensitive than ejection fraction at diagnosing early cardiomyopathies. The extent of cardiovascular injury, as measured by GLS, in patients with elevated blood cobalt levels has not previously been examined.

Sixteen patients with documented blood cobalt ion levels above 13µg/l were identified from a regional arthroplasty database. They were matched with eight patients awaiting hip arthroplasty with no history of cobalt implants. All patients underwent electrocardiogram and echocardiogram assessment for signs of cardiomyopathy including GLS.

Patients with MoM hip arthroplasties had a mean blood cobalt level of 29µg/l (495nmol/l) compared to 0.01µg/l (0.2nmol/l) in the control group. There was no difference or correlation in ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular (LV) end systolic dimension, LV end diastolic dimension, fractional shortening, ventricular wall thickness or E/e’ ratio. However, GLS was significantly reduced in patients with MoM hip arthroplasties compared to those without (−15.2% v −18%, (MoM v control) p= 0.0125). Pearson correlation demonstrated that GLS is significantly correlated with blood cobalt level (r= 0.8742, p=0.0009).

For the first time, this study has demonstrated reduced cardiac function in the presence of normal EF as assessed by GLS in patients with elevated cobalt above 13µg/l. As GLS is a more sensitive measure of systolic function than EF, routine echocardiogram assessment including GLS should be performed in all patients with MoM hip arthroplasties and elevated blood cobalt above 13µg/l. Further work is recommended to assess if these cardiac changes are present in patients with elevated blood cobalt levels below 13µg/l.

Acetabular retroversion is a recognised cause of hip impingement. Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation and is known to change in different functional positions. While previously reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, positional changes in pelvic tilt have not been studied in patients with acetabular retroversion.

We retrospectively analysed supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs in 22 patients with preoperative radiographs and 47 with post-operative radiographs treated for symptomatic acetabular retroversion. Measurements were made for acetabular index (AI), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), crossover index, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. The change in pelvic tilt angle was measured both by the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic (SFP) angle and the Pubic Symphysis to Sacro-iliac (PS-SI) Index.

In the supine position, the mean calculated pelvic tilt angle (by SFP) was 1.05° which changed on standing to a pelvic tilt of 8.64°. A significant increase in posterior pelvic tilt angle from supine to standing of 7.59° (SFP angle) and 5.89° (PS –SI index) was calculated (p<0.001;paired t-test). There was a good correlation in pelvic tilt change between measurements using SFP angle and PS-SI index (rho .901 in pre-op group, rho .815 in post-op group). Signs of retroversion were significantly reduced in standing x-rays compared to supine: Crossover index (0.16 vs 0.38; p<0.001) crossover sign (19/28 vs 28/28 hips; p<0.001), ischial spine sign (10/28 hips vs 26/28 hips; p<0.001) and posterior wall sign (12/28 vs 24/28 hips; p<0.001).

Posterior pelvic tilt increased from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion, in keeping with previous studies of pelvic tilt change in patients with hip dysplasia. The features of acetabular retroversion were much less evident on standing radiographs. The low pelvic tilt angle in the supine position is implicated in the appearance of acetabular retroversion in the supine position. Patients presenting with symptoms of hip impingement should be assessed by supine and standing pelvic radiographs so as not to miss signs of retroversion and to assist with optimising acetabular correction at the time of surgery.

Acetabular retroversion is a recognised cause of hip impingement. Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation and is known to change in different functional positions. While previously reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, positional changes in pelvic tilt have not been studied in patients with acetabular retroversion.

We retrospectively analysed supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs in 22 patients with preoperative radiographs and 47 with post-operative radiographs treated for symptomatic acetabular retroversion. Measurements were made for acetabular index (AI), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), crossover index, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. The change in pelvic tilt angle was measured both by the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic (SFP) angle and the Pubic Symphysis to Sacro-iliac (PS-SI) Index.

In the supine position, the mean calculated pelvic tilt angle (by SFP) was 1.05° which changed on standing to a pelvic tilt of 8.64°. A significant increase in posterior pelvic tilt angle from supine to standing of 7.59° (SFP angle) and 5.89° (PS –SI index) was calculated (p<0.001;paired t-test). The mean pelvic tilt change of 6.51° measured on post-operative Xrays was not significantly different (p=.650). There was a good correlation in pelvic tilt change between measurements using SFP angle and PS-SI index (rho .901 in pre-op group, rho .815 in post-op group). Signs of retroversion were significantly reduced in standing x-rays compared to supine: Crossover index (0.16 vs 0.38; p<0.001) crossover sign (19/28 vs 28/28 hips; p<0.001), ischial spine sign (10/28 hips vs 26/28 hips; p<0.001) and posterior wall sign (12/28 vs 24/28 hips; p<0.001).

Posterior pelvic tilt increased from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion, in keeping with previous studies of pelvic tilt change in patients with hip dysplasia. The features of acetabular retroversion were much less evident on standing radiographs. The low pelvic tilt angle in the supine position is implicated in the appearance of acetabular retroversion in the supine position. Patients presenting with symptoms of hip impingement should be assessed by supine and standing pelvic radiographs so as not to miss signs of retroversion and to assist with optimising acetabular correction at the time of surgery.

Since the introduction of national guidelines in 2009 encouraging the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to treat intracapsular neck of femur fractures there has been no population-based studies into the surgical outcomes for this indication. This study aims to calculate the complication rates for THA when performed for a fractured neck of femur and compare them to THA performed for primary osteoarthritis in the same population.

The Scottish Arthroplasty Project was used to identify all THAs performed in Scotland for neck of femur fracture and osteoarthritis between 1st of January 2009 and 31st December 2014. Dislocation, infection and revision rates at 1 year were calculated.

The rate of dislocation, infection and revision at 1 year were all significantly increased among the fracture neck of femur cohort. In total 44046 THAs were performed, 38316 for OA and 2715 for a neck of femur fracture. 2.1% of patients (n=57) who underwent a THA for a neck of femur fracture suffered a dislocation in the 1st year postoperatively, compared to 0.9% (n=337) when the THA was performed for osteoarthritis. Relative Risk of dislocation: 2.3870 (95% C.I. 1.8077–3.1252, p value <0.0001). Relative Risk of infection: 1.4561 (95% C.I. 1.0496–2.0200, p value 0.0245) Relative Risk of revision: 1.4807 (95% C.I. 1.0308–2.1268, p value 0.0336).

This is the first time a dislocation rate for THA performed for a neck of femur fracture has been calculated for an entire population. As the number of THAs for neck of femur fracture increases this dislocation rate will have clinical implications.