Diabetic ulcer superficial swab cultures have a low specificity for guiding antibiotic treatment. Some studies have recently re-assessed and advocated the role of superficial swabs. We have performed an analysis of microbiology results in patients with infected diabetic ulcers to further appraise the need for using deep tissue cultures as a guide for antimicrobial treatment. We reviewed 23 consecutive diabetic patients in 2013. All patients underwent investigation and treatment by the Orthopaedic department for deep, intractable diabetic ulceration. Microbiology culture results from superficial swabs were compared to deep tissue and bone biopsies.Introduction:
Methods:
Informed consent is integral to good-practice. It protects the patient and offers proof of discussion and interaction between the surgeon and the patient. We compare efficacy of last clinic consent, specialised consent clinic with or without provision of patient specific literature. Group A patients underwent written consent at their last outpatient clinic and conformation of consent on the morning of surgery. Group B underwent consent in designated pre-admission clinic in the week prior to surgery. Group (C) attended the same preadmission clinic and were provided with a surgeon dictated written explanation of their surgery and particular risks. This included a explanation of the procedure, complications, risks and rewards in layman's terms, aimed at patients with a reading age of 14 years, with advice concerning alternative procedures and the consequences of taking no action. The risks are graded: common, less common and rare. All patients undertook a pre-surgery questionnaire on the morning of surgery by an independent observer prior to any contact with the surgical team. Questions focused on their planed procedure, post-operative instructions and possible complications in order to assess the recall of the consent process. A VAS-scale was added to assess overall satisfaction. Statistical analysis was undertaken by a T-test. In total 162-patients were assessed, the response rate was 68.5% (n=111). In-group A (n=16) 18.8% patients remembered 3 relevant complications, 56.2% recalled their post-operative considerations their overall satisfaction was 4/10. In-group B (n=57) 45.5% remembered three complications, 63.7% recalled their postoperative considerations and had a patient satisfaction of 5/10. In-group C (n=38) 48.3% remembered three complications, and 70.7% recalled postoperative considerations, the overall satisfaction improved to 6/10. We observed that the consent process is improved by the use of routine pre-operative consent clinics; however the addition of patient specific literature is observed to further improve recall and satisfaction.
