Computer Tomography (CT) imaging has been limited to beam hardening artefacts until now. Literature has failed to describe sensitivity and specifity for loosening of endoprothesis in CTs, as metal artefacts have always influenced the diagnostic value of CTs. In recent years a new technology has been developed, the Dual Energy CT. Dual Energy CT scanners simultaneously scan with two tubes at different energy levels, most commonly 100kVp and 140kVp. Furthermore pictures gained from Dual Energy CTs are post-processed with monoenergetic reconstruction, which increases picture quality while further reducing metal artefacts. This promising technology has increased the diagnostic value preventing more radiation for the patients, for example in detection of kidney stones or to map lung perfusion. In the musculoskeletal imaging it has not been established yet and further clinical investigations are necessary. Thus the aim of this study is to describe sensitivity and sensibility for endoprothesis loosening of this novel technology. 53 prospective patients (31 total hip- and 22 total knee-arthoplasties) who were planned for revision surgery underwent preoperative Dual Energy CT examination. All scans were performed with a second-generation, dual-energy multi-detector CT scanner. And all pictures were post-processed with monoenergetic reconstruction. Radiologists were blinded for patient´s history. Senior consultants, who are specialized in arthroplasty of the hip and the knee, performed surgery. Intraoperative information was used as gold standard.Introduction
Material and Methods
Triangular fibrocartilaginous complex (TFCC) tears are common sources of ulna sided wrist pain and resultant functional disability. Diagnosis is based on history, clinical examination and radiological evidence of a TFCC central perforation or radial/ulna tear. The purpose of this study is therefore to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the detection of TFCC injury in the adult population. Published and unpublished literature databases were systematically review independently by two researchers. Two-by-two tables were constructed to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of MRI or MRA investigations against arthroscopic outcomes. Pooled sensitivity and specificity values and summary Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (sROC) evaluations were performed. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool.Background and Objectives
Methods
Locognosia, the ability to localise touch, is one aspect of tactile spatial discrimination which relies on the integrity of peripheral end-organs as well as the somatosensory representation of the surface of the body in the brain. The test presented here is a standardised assessment which uses a protocol for testing locognosia in the zones of the hand supplied by the median and/or ulnar nerves. The test-retest reliability and discriminant validity were investigated in 39 patients with injuries to the median or ulnar nerve. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to calculate the test-retest reliability. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing the injured with the unaffected hand. Excellent test-retest reliability was demonstrated for the injuries to the median (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.924, 95% confidence interval 0.848 to 1.00) and the ulnar nerves (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.859, 95% confidence interval 0.693 to 1.00). The magnitude of the difference in scores between affected and unaffected hands showed good discriminant validity. For injuries to the median nerve the mean difference was 11.1 points (1 to 33; The locognosia test has excellent test-retest reliability, is a valid test of tactile spatial discrimination and should be included in the evaluation of outcome after injury to peripheral nerves.
