Range of motion (ROM) simulation of the hip is useful to understand the maximum impingement free ROM in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In spite of a complex multi-directional movement of the hip in daily life, most of the previous reports have evaluated the ROM only in specific directions such as flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and internal - external rotation at 0° or 90° of hip flexion. Therefore, we developed ROM simulation software (THA analyzer) to measure impingement free ROM in any positions of the hip. Recent designs of the hip implants give a wider ROM by increasing the head diameter and then, bone to bone impingement can be a ROM limit factor particularly in a combination of deep flexion, adduction and internal rotation of the hip. Therefore, the purpose of this study were to observe an individual variation in the pattern of the bone impingement ROM in normal hip bone models using this software, to classify the bone impingement ROM mapping types and to clarify the factors affecting the bone impingement type. The subjects were 15 normal hips of 15 patients. Three dimensional surface models of the pelvis and femur were reconstructed from Computer tomography (CT) images. We performed virtual hip implantation with the same center of rotation, femoral offset, and leg length as the original hips. Subsequently, we created the ROM mapping until bone impingement using THA analyzer. We measured the following factors influenced on the bone impingement map patterns; the neck shaft angle, the femoral offset, femoral anteversion, pelvic tilt, acetabular anteversion, sharp angle, and CE angle. These factors were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with Mann-Whitney U test, and statistical significance was set at P<0.05.Introduction
Methods
While numerous studies have examined dislocation caused by basic everyday movements, no objective studies have investigated body positions to minimize risk of dislocation during intercourse. We therefore used a four-dimensional motion analysis system to assess sexual activities in patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA), to identify body positions displaying less risk of dislocation. Five body-surface infrared sensors were placed on five healthy female volunteers, and maximum hip joint angle was measured. Subjects were asked to take the following three body positions: supine (missionary); top (woman on top); and kneeling (doggy-style). Angle data obtained using body surface markers were combined with three-dimensional skeletal models extracted using CT images obtained from the 24 joints of 16 patients who had undergone THA, to ascertain angles at which collision with the artificial joint or skeleton would occur. Collision angle for: supine position at maximum abduction in flexion was 77±16° in flexion and 82±57° in medial rotation; top position at maximum extension was 36±16° in flexion and 68±53° in medial rotation; top position at maximum flexion was 12±9° in flexion and 14±11° in medial rotation; kneeling position at maximum extension was 115±1° in flexion and 127±44° in medial rotation; and kneeling position at maximum flex-ion was 14±8° in flexion and 17±11° in medial rotation. The present study only assessed risk for dislocation caused by collision with the artificial joint or skeleton, and did not take into account the effects of soft tissue. However, we were able to quantitatively assess angle of the hip joint for some leg positions involved with various common coital positions. The results showed that the supine position at maximum abduction in flexion is relatively safe, since the range of motion before collision would occur was relatively wide. In addition, top and kneeling positions at maximum extension were relatively safe, but caution must be exercised at maximum flexion, as not much extra angle was available in flexion and medial rotation.
We have developed a novel system of 4-dimensional motion analysis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) that can aid in preventing dislocation by assessing safe range of motion for patients in several daily activities. This system uses skeletal structure data from CT and motion capture data from an infrared position sensor. A 3-D model reconstructed from CT data is combined with the motion capture data. Using this system, we analyzed hip motion when getting up from and sitting down in a chair or picking up an object while sitting in a chair in 17 patients (26 hips) who underwent THA. To assess the accuracy of this system’s measurements, open MRI was used to evaluate positions of skin markers against bones in 5 healthy volunteers in various postures. No impingement between bones and/or implants was found in any subjects during any activities. However, mean angle at the point of maximum hip flexion was different for each patient. The open MRI results indicated that average error in hip angle of the present system was within 5 degrees for each static posture. The functional position of the pelvis during daily activities must be taken into account when assessing the real risk of dislocation. The present system enables dynamic analysis involving not only alignment of components and bones of each patient, but also individual differences in characteristics of daily motions. Further investigation using this system can help determine safe ranges of motion for preventing hip dislocation, improving the accuracy of individualized guidance for patients regarding postoperative activities.
