To determine whether there is any benefit using a minimally invasive trans-sartorial approach as described by Professor Søballe compared to the ilio-femoral for peri-acetabular osteotomy 30 consecutive patients were operated on by a single surgeon. The first 15 underwent an ilio-femoral (I-F) approach whilst the following 15 had a trans-sartorial (T-S) approach. Fixation was achieved with 3 or 4 screws. All other aspects of surgery and rehabilitation were the same. Data was collected prospectively and included operation time, intra-operative blood loss and length of stay. Acetabular correction was measured using the sourcil and centre edge angle (CEA) on pre and post-operative radiographs.Aims
Methods
The focus on evidence-based medicine has led to calls for increased levels of evidence in surgical journals. The purpose of the present study was to review the levels of evidence in articles published in the foot and ankle literature and to assess changes in the level of evidence over a decade. All articles from the years 2000 and 2010 in Foot and Ankle International, Foot and Ankle Surgery, and all foot and ankle articles from JBJS A and JBJS B were analysed. Animal, cadaveric, basic science, editorials, surveys, letters to Editor and correspondence were excluded. Articles were ranked by a five-point level of evidence scale, according to guidelines from the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine.Background
Methods
