Over 96% of primary total hip replacements (THR) recorded in the National Joint Registry (NJR) are performed through a posterior or lateral surgical approach. There is no high quality evidence available to support the use of one approach over the other in primary THR and even less evidence when the outcome of revision THR is considered. Questionnaires were sent to 267 patients who had revision hip replacements between January 2006 and March 2010 for aseptic loosening. They rated their pain from 0–10, and used the Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale (SAPS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short form-12 (SF-12).Background
Methods
Vertebroplasty helps to restore mechanical function to a fractured vertebra. We investigated how the Nine pairs of three-vertebra cadaver spine specimens (aged 67–90 yr) were compressed to induce fracture. One of each pair underwent vertebroplasty with PMMA, the other with a resin (Cortoss). Specimens were then creep-loaded at 1.0kN for 1hr. Before and after vertebroplasty, compressive stiffness was determined, and stress profilometry was performed by pulling a pressure-transducer through each disc whilst under 1.0kN load. Profiles indicated intradiscal pressure (IDP) and compressive load-bearing by the neural arch (FN) at both disc levels. Micro-CT was used to quantify cement fill in the anterior and posterior halves of each augmented vertebral body, and also in the region immediately adjacent to the fractured endplateIntroduction
Methods
