header advert
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(9):598–600.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 82 - 82
1 Feb 2020
Gustke K Harrison E Abdelmaseih R Abdelmasih R Harris R
Full Access

Introduction

Cardiac events have been found to occur with increased frequency in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients >65 y/o without known coronary artery disease (CAD). Avoidance of readmissions for cardiac events is paramount with bundled payment programs. It has been thought that many of these patients may have undiagnosed CAD because of sedentary life styles brought on by chronic osteoarthritis.

The purpose of this study is to assess with Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) the prevalence and severity of CAD in patients >65 y/o for elective TJA.

Methods

126 elective patients that were part of a total hip and knee bundled payment program were referred for cardiac evaluation with CCTA if they were >65 but <70 y/o with a history of heart disease or 2 risk factors or were >70 y/o. CCTA was acquired on all patients unless they had a history of a severe allergic reaction to contrast, GFR <50 ml/min., the presence of atrial fibrillation, or declined the test. All images were evaluated by an experienced reader. Arterial narrowing of 70% diameter or greater was classified as significant CAD. Intermediate lesions <70% were reclassified as significant if CT-FFR (Functional flow reserve) was < or = 0.80.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 51 - 51
1 Feb 2020
Gustke K Harrison E Heinrichs S
Full Access

Background

In surgeon controlled bundled payment and service models, the goal is to reduce cost but preserve quality. The surgeon not only takes on risk for the surgery, but all costs during 90 days after the procedure. If savings are achieved over a previous target price, the surgeon can receive a monetary bonus. The surgeon is placed in a position to optimize the patients preoperatively to minimize expensive postoperative readmissions in a high risk population. Traditionally, surgeons request that primary care providers medically clear the patient for surgery with cardiology consultation at their discretion, and without dictating specific testing. Our participation in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) program for total hip and knee replacement surgeries since 1/1/15 has demonstrated a significant number of patients having costly readmissions for cardiac events.

Objective

To determine the medical effectiveness and cost savings of instituting a new innovative cardiac screening program (Preventive Cardio-Orthopaedics) for total hip and knee replacement patients in the BPCI program and to compare result to those managed in the more traditional fashion.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 73 - 73
1 Apr 2019
Gustke K Harrison E Heinrichs S
Full Access

Background

The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) was developed by the US Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to evaluate a payment and service delivery model to reduce cost but preserve quality. 90 day postoperative expenditures are reconciled against a target price, allowing for a monetary bonus to the provider if savings were achieved. The surgeon is placed in a position to optimize the patients preoperatively to minimize expensive postoperative cardiovascular readmissions in a high risk population. Traditionally, surgeons request that primary care providers medically clear the patient for surgery with or without additional cardiology consultation, without dictating specific testing. Typical screening includes an EKG, occasionally an echocardiogram and nuclear stress test, and rarely a cardiac catheterization. Our participation in the BPCI program for total hip and knee replacement surgeries since 1/1/15 has demonstrated a significant number of patients having readmissions for cardiac events.

Objective

To determine the medical effectiveness and cost savings of instituting a new innovative cardiac screening program (Preventive Cardio-Orthopaedics) for total hip and knee replacement patients in the BPCI program and to compare result to those managed in the more traditional fashion.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 16 - 16
1 Nov 2016
Roberts V Mason L Harrison E Molloy A Mangwani J
Full Access

Introduction

We performed a longitudinal outcome study involving the operative management of ankle fractures at two university teaching hospitals. This was a retrospective review of the quality of reduction and a prospective study into the functional outcome.

Methods

All patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation of the ankle between November 2006 and November 2007 at one centre, and January to December 2009 at the other were included. Adequacy of reduction was assessed on the initial post-operative radiographs using Pettrone's criterion. The post-operative functional outcome was recorded using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), completed by postal or telephone follow-up at 64 months post injury (60–74 months).


Introduction

We report the outcomes of minimally invasive technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedure using Hollow Modular Anchorage (HMA) screws supplemented by routine pedicle screw fixation (Dynesis).

Patients and Methods

Seventy-nine patients, who had undergone PLIF procedure using HMA screws supplemented by pedicle screw fixation, were included. Patients deemed suitable for surgery following discography under sedation, with Marcaine instillation establishing reducibility of the listhesis and temporary relief of symptoms. Clinical outcome included visual analogue scale scores for leg pain and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-36 questionnaires.