We reviewed the clinical and radiological results of six patients who had sustained traumatic separation of the distal epiphysis of the humerus at birth.

The correct diagnosis was made from plain radiographs and often supplemented with ultrasonography, MRI and arthrography. An orthopaedic surgeon saw two patients within two days of birth, and the other four were seen at between nine and 30 days. The two neonates underwent unsuccessful attempts at closed reduction. In the remaining patients, seen after the age of eight days, no attempt at reduction was made. All six displaced fractures were immobilised in a cast with the elbow at 90° of flexion and the forearm pronated.

When seen at a mean of 58 months (16 to 120) after injury, the clinical and radiological results were excellent in five patients, with complete realignment of the injury. In one patient the forearm lay in slightly reduced valgus with the elbow in full extension.

Traumatic separation of the distal epiphysis of the humerus may be missed on the maternity wards and not diagnosed until after discharge from hospital. However, even when no attempt is made to reduce the displaced epiphysis, a good clinical result can be expected.

We reviewed the radiological and clinical long-term results after the nailing in situ of slipped upper femoral epiphysis in 59 hips in 43 patients. The displacement of the epiphysis had been measured as the ‘slipping angle’ before operation and related to the results at follow-up at a mean of 30.9 years (27 to 34). The mean age at follow-up was 44.2 years (39 to 50).

Radiographic re-examination of 41 hips with slipping angles of ≤30° at the time of operation showed that eight (20%) had developed mild osteoarthritis and one had severe changes. For 18 hips with slipping angles ranging from 31 to 50° at surgery six (33%) had mild osteoarthritis and three had severe changes. The differences did not quite achieve statistical significance (p = 0.09).

Clinical re-examination of the 41 hips with slipping angles of ≤30° showed fair or poor results (Harris hip score < 90) in three (7%). In the 18 hips with slipping of 31 to 50°, four had fair or poor results (22%) (p= 0.13).

We conclude that nailing in situ for slipping of ≤30°, using one thin nail, can give excellent long-term results. At present we recommend that hips with slips ranging from 31 to 50° should also be nailed in situ, but further long-term studies are required, especially on the choice between nailing in situ and corrective osteotomy for slips in excess of 50°.

We reviewed the long-term results of the treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) using realignment procedures in 36 patients (37 hips) at an average follow-up of 33.8 years (26 to 42). There were serious short-term complications in seven of the 22 hips treated by subcapital osteotomy, three of the 11 hips treated by intertrochanteric osteotomy and three of the four hips treated by manipulative reduction.

At re-examination, the clinical and radiological results were excellent or good in 41% of the hips treated by subcapital osteotomy, in 36% treated by intertrochanteric osteotomy and in none treated by manipulative reduction. In all, seven hips (19%) had had arthrodesis or total hip replacement.

The natural history of SUFE was probably not improved by any of the treatments used in our study. We therefore discourage the use of subcapital and intertrochanteric osteotomy as well as manipulative reduction in the primary treatment of chronic SUFE.