The pattern and magnitude of pelvic periprosthetic bone loss around cementless metal-backed acetabular implants have previously been described. The pattern of periprosthetic BMD change around cemented all-polyethylene acetabular implants is unreported. The aims of this study were to determine the precision of pelvic BMD measurements around the Charnley cup and to examine the longitudinal pattern of BMD change over the first 2 years after surgery.

19 subjects who had previously received a Charnley cup for osteoarthritis underwent duplicate measurements of pelvic BMD after repositioning using an Hologic QDR 4500A densitometer. Scan analysis was carried out using a 4-region of interest model according to a protocol previously described. In-vivo precision was expressed as coefficient of variation (CV%) for each region of interest. The precision of pelvic periprosthetic BMD measurements were 7.7%, 9.8%, 10.8%, and 9.9% for regions 1 to 4, respectively.

Longitudinal BMD changes were measured over a 2 year period in 32 patients (mean age 74 years; 22 women) undergoing cemented THA for unilateral osteoarthritis (17 right-sided). Transient decreases in BMD were observed in regions 2 and 3 (behind the dome of the implant) at 3 months (−9.0% and −13.2%, respectively; P< 0.05) and at 1 year (−8.1% and −9.3%; P< 0.05). By 2 years there had been some recovery in bone mass (BMD−6.9% and −2.6% respectively). No significant changes in BMD for regions 1 and 4 (located at the rim of the implant) were found.

The precision of pelvic periprosthetic BMD measurements for the cemented Charnley cup are poorer than those we have previously reported for cementless cups and may be due, in part, to cement artifact. The pattern of BMD change observed for the Charnley implant suggests that load transfer between the implant and the pelvis occurs principally at the implant rim. The magnitude of bone loss is similar to that we have previously reported for cementless metal-backed acetabular implants.