There are several potential biological mechanisms that may influence aseptic implant failure including excessive innate and adaptive immune responses to implant debris. We investigated the hypothesis that patients with painful total joint replacements will exhibit elevated levels of metal reactivity and inflammatory markers compared to patients with well-performing TJA. We evaluated this hypothesis by testing for metal hypersensitivity using in vitro LTT assay and analyzing serum levels of selected inflammatory markers. Subject Groups: Blinded de-identified data from patients with TJR referred for metal hypersensitivity testing using a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and serum markers of inflammation using Luminex Multi-Analyte Assay was approved by Rush University IRB and retrospectively reviewed. None of the patients had radiographically identifiable osteolysis. Two groups of TJA patients were tested: Group 1: Well-functioning implant (<3 yrs. post-op), with no self-reported pain, i.e. <1 on 0ā10 VAS scale (n=8) and Group 2: Painful TJR (<3 yrs. post-op), with self-determined pain of >8 on a 0ā10 VAS scale at the time of blood draw (n=25). Metal-LTT: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from 30mL of peripheral blood by Ficoll gradient separation. PBMCs were cultured with NiCl2. 3H Thymidine was added at day 5 of culture and 3H thymidine incorporation was analyzed using a beta scintillation counter at day 6. A stimulation index (SI) of reactivity was calculated by dividing scintillation counts per minute (cpms) of Ni challenged cells by those of untreated controls. A SI of <2 was considered nonreactive, 2 to <4 was mildly reactive and 4 to <8 was reactive. Luminex Assay: Serum samples were collected from whole blood and were analyzed according to manufacturer's protocols. Statistical analysis: Statistical differences were determined using unpaired t-test with Welch's correction with statistical significance at pā¤0.1 (90% confidence interval).Introduction
Methods
Early failure associated with adverse reactions to metal debris is an emerging problem after hip resurfacing but the exact mechanism is unclear. We analysed our entire series of 660 metal-on-metal resurfacings (Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR)) and large-bearing ASR total hip replacements, to establish associations with metal debris-related failures. Clinical and radiological outcomes, metal ion levels, explant studies and lymphocyte transformation tests were performed. A total of 17 patients (3.4%) were identified (all ASR bearings) with adverse reactions to metal debris, for which revision was required. This group had significantly smaller components, significantly higher acetabular component anteversion, and significantly higher whole concentrations of blood and joint chromium and cobalt ions than asymptomatic patients did (all p <
0.001). Post-revision lymphocyte transformation tests on this group showed no reactivity to chromium or cobalt ions. Explants from these revisions had greater surface wear than retrievals for uncomplicated fractures. The absence of adverse reactions to metal debris in patients with well-positioned implants usually implies high component wear. Surgeons must consider implant design, expected component size and acetabular component positioning in order to reduce early failures when performing large-bearing metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and replacement.
