Large-scale retrieval studies have shown backside wear in tibial inserts is dependent on the surface roughness of the tibial tray. Manufacturers acknowledge this design factor and have responded with the marketing of mirror-finished trays, which are clinically proven to have lower wear rates in comparison to historically “rough” (e.g. grit blasted) trays. While the relationship between wear and surface roughness has been explored in other polymer applications, the quantitative dependence of backside wear rate on quantitative surface finish has not yet been established for modern devices. The present study evaluates small-excursion polyethylene wear on pucks of a variety of surface roughnesses. The objective of this study is to determine where inflection points exist in the relationship between surface roughness and wear rate. An AMTI Orthopod, 6-station pin on disk tribotest was designed to mimic worst-case in vivo backside wear conditions based on published retrieval analyses. Titanium (Ti6Al4V) pucks with six different surface roughness preparations (Sa ranges from 0.06 um to 1.06 um) were characterized with white light profilometry. Never implanted polyethylene tibial inserts (never irradiated, EtO sterilized) were machined into 6 mm diameter cylindrical pins. Fretting-type motion was conducted in a 2mm square pattern at 2Hz under 100 N constant force in 25% bovine serum lubricant for 1.35 million cycles in triplicate. Mass measurements were taken every 225 thousand cycles.Introduction
Materials and Methods
