Liposarcoma (LPS) is among the most common soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults, accounting for >
10% of all STS. In children and adolescents, however, LPS are a rarity. Limited data about best treatment of pediatric LPS are derived from the scarce single-centre reports encompassing no more than a dozen patients.
Median age was 14 years, median follow-up for survivors as of 2/2009 seven years. Sixteen patients had localized, two metastatic LPS at diagnosis. Lymphnodes were affected in a single case. The most frequent primary site were the limbs (n=11), the remaining seven were trunk tumours (abdomen n=4, thorax n=3). 10/18 primary tumours were >
5cm. Thirteen LPS were completely resected at best surgery, and microscopically residual disease remained in two more tumours. Six individuals received radiation with a median dose of 45Gy, including one of the two R1-resected patients. Nine patients received multiagent chemotherapy (only two of them since 1996 onwards). Response to induction treatment could be assessed in three of these nine individuals, but tumour volume regression occured in a single case only. Four patients died of disease, among them two of the three patients who did not achieve a CR with primary treatment. Two relapses (one combined, one metastatic), both involving the lungs, occurred one years after diagnosis and these patients were not salvaged. Actuarial 5-year EFS and OS survival rates were 69±23 and 81±20%, respectively. LPS account for <
0.1% of childhood STS. The golden standard of treatment and key to cure is complete surgical excision. The role of radiation and/or chemotherapy remains unclear, but both modalities do not appear to be indicated in completely resected, localized tumours.
Local control cannot be achieved in many cases of soft tissue sarcoma by surgery alone. Additional irradiation is often necessary. This reveals the question of the optimal sequence of resection, reconstruction and irradiation.
A review of the literature concerning preop and postop irradiation in soft tissue sarcoma. The criteria of decision making in 15 cases of our own patients concerning the question of preop and postop irratdiation.
Review of the literature: There ist a certain benefit in additional irradiation concerning local control, but there is no evidence in favour of preop or postop irradiation concerning overall survival.
Preop irradiation is preferred in all cases of microvascular bone repair in order not to interfere with bony healing and hypertrophy of the transplants. Pathological fractures after irradiation are very difficult to treat. In children irradiation has to respect the epiphyseal areas. Microvascular tissue transfer after irradiation may fill up big tissue defects after wide resection, may improve wound healing and prevent lymph edema