The duration and extent of postoperative wound leakage after joint arthroplasty in patients with or without a complicated course, like a prosthetic joint infection (PJI), is currently unknown. Adequate differentiation between normal postoperative wound leakage and wound leakage due to a postoperative PJI is important and prevents unnecessary surgical procedures. We investigated the association between postoperative wound leakage and development of PJI in patients who used a previously developed mobile wound care app. A multicenter, prospective cohort study with patients aged 18 years or older after primary implantation or revision of a total joint arthroplasty. During 30 post-operative days after arthroplasty, patients recorded their wound status in the woundcare app. An algorithm calculated a daily score from imputed data. If the daily score exceeded a predefined threshold, the patients received an alert that advised them to contact their physician.Background
Methods
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) has shown to be a general stimulation for repair and 1 year results showed promising success percentages. To determine the effectiveness of PRP compared with corticosteroid injections in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis with a two-year follow-up. A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between May 2006 and January 2008. The trial was conducted in two Dutch teaching hospitals. 100 patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis were randomly assigned to a leucocyte-enriched PRP group (n=51) or in the corticosteroid group (n=49). Randomization and allocation to the trial group were carried out by a central computer system. Patients received either a corticosteroid injection or an autologous platelet concentrate injection through a peppering needling technique. The primary analysis included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome (DASH) scores. The PRP group was more often successfully treated than the corticosteroid group (p<.0001). Success was defined as a reduction of 25% on VAS or DASH scores without a re-intervention after 2 years. When baseline VAS and DASH scores were compared with the scores at 2 years follow-up, both groups significantly improved across time (intention-to-treat principle). However, the DASH scores of the corticosteroid group returned back to baseline levels, while the PRP significantly improved (as-treated principle). There were no complications related to the use of PRP. Treatment of patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis with PRP reduces pain and increases function significantly, exceeding the effect of corticosteroid injection even after a follow-up of two years. Future decisions for application of PRP for lateral epicondylitis should be confirmed by further follow-up from this trial and should take into account possible costs and harms as well as benefits.
