In 10% of the presumed aseptic hip or knee revisions, a low-grade infection is unexpectedly diagnosed based on the tissue samples taken during revision. Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis can possibly reduce the failure rate in cases of unexpected PJI, because the prophylaxis can be considered as early empiric treatment. In this randomized controlled study we analysed whether extended antimicrobial prophylaxis compared to a single dose is beneficial to improve the outcome of treatment in unexpected PJI in revision arthroplasty. This study was nested in a randomized clinical trial comparing single-dose cefazolin with prolonged prophylaxis (15 doses of cefazolin over 5 days) for revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee. For this analysis, patients were included if an unsuspected PJI (defined as ≥2 positive intraoperative tissue samples with the same microorganism) was diagnosed. PJI treatment consisted of 12 weeks of a rifampicin-based regimen in Staphylococcal PJI, without removal of the prosthesis. We examined Infection characteristics and success of treatment after one year, defined as the absence of signs or treatment for PJI during follow-up.Aim
Method
Bone and joint infection requires antimicrobial treatment for 6 to 12 weeks. When patients are well prepared and instructed regarding their therapy, they are more likely to have less side effects and improved compliance. Although side effects are common, this coaching is often not routinely performed when oral treatment is given. We developed a monitoring and guidance program for our outpatients who are on long term antimicrobial therapy, in which we can early signal side effects and treatment failure and coach the patients in their journey of infection treatment. In our tertiary referral centre for orthopaedic infections, we started the outpatient monitoring of antimicrobial treatment (OMAT)- team for patients who will receive antimicrobial therapy for >2 weeks. Before discharge, our trained nurse gives instruction to the patient. Within 3 days after hospital discharge the patient is contacted by phone to, if necessary, clarify ambiguities in monitoring set up. During this contact, the nurse checks for side effects, addresses logistic problems regarding laboratory monitoring or future appointments and coaches patients for other questions. The patient is instructed how to recognize and who to contact in case of red flags and problems possibly related to the treatment. This is repeated after every laboratory check-up. Supervision is performed by an infectious disease specialist in close collaboration with the patient's surgeon.Aim
Method
To date, the value of culture results after a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for early (suspected) prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as risk indicators in terms of prosthesis retention is not clear. At one year follow-up, the relative risk of prosthesis removal was determined for culture-positive and culture-negative DAIRs after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. The secondary aim was to explore differences in patient characteristics, infection characteristics and outcomes between these two groups. A retrospective regional registry study was performed in a group of 359 patients (positive cultures: n = 299, negative cultures n = 60) undergoing DAIR for high suspicion of early PJI in the period from 2014 to 2019. Differences in patient characteristics, deceased patients and number of subsequent DAIRs between the positive and negative DAIR groups were analyzed using independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney, Pearson's Chi-square tests and Fisher's Exact tests.Aim
Methods
Success rate of debridement, antimicrobial and implant retention (DAIR) in high suspicion of early PJI after primary arthroplasty is 70–80%. No studies have been performed focusing on outcome of DAIR after revision arthroplasty of the hip (THA) or knee (TKA). The aim of this study is to investigate the outcome of DAIR in suspected early PJI after revision THA or TKA and to identify risk factors for failure. In this retrospective study, we identified early DAIRs after revision THA or TKA performed between January 2012 and August 2019. All patients received empirical antibiotics directly after the DAIR procedure. Antimicrobial treatment was adjusted to the tissue culture results. Success was defined as: 1) implant retention; 2) no repeated revision arthroplasty or supervised neglect after treatment; 3) no persistent or recurrent PJI after treatment and no administration of suppressive antimicrobial therapy; 4) survival of the patient. Infection free success was defined as: 1) no persistent or recurrent PJI after treatment; 2) no administration of suppressive antimicrobial therapy.Aim
Method
National Joint Replacement Registries, which are important sources for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) data, report an average PJI incidence ranging from 0.5 to 2.0%. Unfortunately, national registries including the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI), are not specifically designed to register PJI. In the Netherlands, the LROI is a nationwide population-based registry with an overall completeness of more than 95%.3 To ensure usability and reliability of PJI data from the LROI, it is important to evaluate the quality and completeness of these data. From 2013 onwards, eight hospitals in the South-East of the Netherlands, collected their PJI data in a detailed regional infection cohort (RIC), specifically designed for this purpose. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and completeness of PJI registration (hip and knee arthroplasty) in the LROI, by comparing the LROI with the RIC. All patients registered with an acute PJI in the RIC between 2014–2018 were selected for the study and were matched with the LROI. According to the Workgroup of American Musculoskeletal Infections Society (MSIS), an acute PJI was defined as at least two phenotypically identical pathogens, isolated in cultures from at least two separate tissues, obtained from the affected peri-prosthetic tissue during the DAIR treatment (debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention). Only PJI occurring within 90 days after primary hip or knee arthroplasty were included. The LROI data and completeness was based on the entered procedures and documented reason for revision infection, which was not specially based on the MSIS criteria. After checks on missing and incorrectly data, the completeness of registration in the LROI was calculated by comparing the number of registrations in the LROI with data from the RIC (gold standard).Aim
Method
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a feared complication of total joint arthroplasty of hip (THA) or knee (TKA). Debridement, antibiotic treatment, and implant retention (DAIR) is an effective treatment of early PJI. In the Netherlands, cefazolin resistance in early PJI after primary arthroplasty is low. Little is known about causative micro-organisms and resistance patterns in PJI after revision arthroplasty. No recommendations for empirical treatment are described in the current guidelines. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics of PJI after revision arthroplasty and to evaluate whether the used empirical treatment regimens are adequate, based on microbiology data. In this retrospective study we included patients with early PJI after aseptic revision of THA or TKA, treated with DAIR between 2012 and 2020. Success rate was defined as implant retention and no persistent or recurrent infection during one year follow-up.Aim
Method
We designed a study to evaluate whether (1) there were differences in PROMs between different reasons for revision THA at baseline, (2) there was a different interaction effect for revision THA for all PROMs, and (3) complication and re-revision rates differ between reason for revision THA. Prospective cohort of 647 patients undergoing rTHA, with a minimum of 2 years FU. The reason for revision were classified as infection, aseptic loosening, dislocation, structural failure and painful THA with uncommon causes. PROMs (EQ-5D score, Oxford hip score (OHS), VAS pain, complication and failure rates were compared between different groups. Patients with different reason for revision had improvement of PROMs’ over time. Preoperatively, patients revised due to infection and aseptic loosening had poorer OHS and EQ-5D than patients with other reason for revision. Pain scores at baseline were highest in patients revised due to dislocation. Infection and aseptic loosening groups also showed a significant interaction effect over time in both OHS and EQ-5D. No PROMs significant differences between groups were observed 2 years postoperatively. Overall complications, and re-revision rates were 35.4 and 9.7% respectively. The reason for revision THA did not associate with clinical outcomes. Good outcomes were reached regardless of the reason for revision, as patients with the poorest pre-operative scores had the best improvement in PROMs over time. Complication and re-operation rates were relatively high, in line with previous reports, but did not differ between different reasons for revision THA.
Ruling out an infection in one-stage knee and hip revisions for presumed aseptic failure by conventional tissue cultures takes up to 14 days. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a quick test (4–5 hours) for detecting infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the negative predictive value of an automated multiplex PCR for the detection of microorganisms in synovial fluid obtained intraoperatively in unsuspected knee and hip revisions. The NPV of the multiplex PCR U-ITI system of synovial fluid compared to tissue cultures of knee and hip revisions was 95.7% and 92.5%, respectively. Cultures required several days for growth whereas the automated mPCR U-ITI system provided results within five hours. The multiplex PCR U-ITI system is a quick and reliable test in ruling out infection in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions. With this test the number of unsuspected infected revisions can be lowered and antibiotic overtreatment as well as undertreatment after one-stage revision arthroplasty can be avoided. This directly results in a reduction in length of hospital stay, hospital costs and possible antibiotic resistance development.
Long term use of antibiotics following surgical debridement are the cornerstone of PJI treatment. Due to increasing resistance of bacteria for many first line antibiotics new options are needed. One such option is linezolid known for its low percentage of resistance against many Gram positive bacteria causing PJI. Success rates up to 86% have been reported. At the same time many adverse events (AE) have been described including anemia, thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal effects and sometimes neuropathy, e.g. irreversible vision loss [1, 2]. Therefore, linezolid use is advised to be limited to a maximum of 28 days. Literature about the effects of prolonged use is currently lacking and therefore this study will aim to determine the safety of long-term (>28 days) linezolid use in patients with orthopedic infections. We performed a retrospective descriptive study on patient records of orthopedic patients who were treated with linezolid between January 2014 and January 2019 for >28 days. Data were collected from medical charts including co-morbidities, pre-existing liver/kidney dysfunctions, diagnosis, treatment, type of prosthesis, pathogens, adverse events associated with linezolid use and follow up laboratory data.Aim
Methods
Currently, despite a thorough diagnostic work up, around ten percent of the presumed aseptic revisions turn out to have unexpected positive cultures during the revision procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the negative predictive value (ruling out) of the automated multiplex PCR Unyvero i60 implant and tissue infection (ITI) cartridge (U-ITI) system for the detection of microorganisms in synovial fluid obtained intraoperatively. A prospective study was conducted with 200 patients undergoing a one-stage knee or hip revision. In all patients six intraoperative tissue cultures were taken and a sample of synovial fluid which was analyzed as a culture and with the multiplex PCR U-ITI system. The primary outcome measure was the negative predictive value (NPV) of the multiplex PCR U-ITI system compared to the intraoperative tissue cultures to reliable rule out an infection.Aim
Methods
Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) remains one of the leading cause for revision arthroplasty.1,2 Early recognition and appropriate initial treatment of early PJI with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) can eradicate infection on first attempt and prevent implant failure. We evaluated the outcome after one year of patients who were treated for an early PJI after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) with DAIR. Furthermore, we determined preoperative infection markers, microbiology, and treatment factors related to treatment failure after DAIR procedure. A retrospective cohort study was assembled with 91 patients undergoing DAIR after primary TKA or THP with a high suspicion of an early PJI. For all patients intraoperative cultures were obtained. Records were reviewed for demographic details, preoperative laboratory results, microbiological data, given treatment and postoperative follow-up. The primary outcome measure was infection-free implant survival at one year. Repeated DAIR was not considered as treatment failure.Aim
Method
Despite a preoperative workup with no evidence to suspect a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) before revision surgery, routinely obtained intraoperative cultures still can be unexpectedly positive. The purpose of this study was (1) to assess the incidence of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions and (2) to determine whether a difference exists between the infection-free implant survival rate of patients with and without unexpected positive intraoperative cultures. We selected patients who underwent a one-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for different reasons. Three or more separate intraoperative cultures were obtained during each procedure. A negative result was defined as less than two positive cultures with the same microorganism. An unsuspected PJI was defined as having two or more positive cultures with the same microorganism. Patients’ medical records were reviewed to collect demographics, preoperative laboratory results, culture results, and the occurrence of infection during follow-up.Aim
Method
Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) caused by Streptococcus species are relatively common. The aim of our study was to assess outcome after treatment for early and late PJI with Streptococcus species after a follow-up of two years. For this study we retrospectively included all patients with primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip (THA) arthroplasty, a minimum of two periprosthetic tissue cultures positive for Streptococcus species and a minimum follow-up of one year. According to international guidelines patients were classified as having early or late PJI. All patients with an early PJI were treated according to a standard treatment protocol, i.e. debridement and retention of the prosthesis, followed by adequate antibiotic therapy. Patients with late PJI underwent a debridement followed by adequate antibiotic therapy or joint revision. Patients’ hospital records were reviewed and we evaluated the status of the original prosthesis after an infection. Forty cases were included; 24 early and 16 late PJI. For early PJI, open debridement was performed in all patients, after a mean of 19 (range: 9 – 80) days. At final follow-up 21 prostheses (88%) were still in situ and without clinical signs of infection. Eight cases (41%) of late PJI were successfully treated with debridement and retention. Nine patients (59%) underwent a one- or two-stage revision. At final follow-up 16 patients (100%) with late PJI had a prosthesis in situ. Streptococcus dysgalactiae species accounted for more than 50% of the early infections, followed by Streptococcus agalactiae with 30%. In case of PJI with Streptococcus species open debridement and retention of the prosthesis should be performed followed by adequate and long-term antibiotic treatment. As expected, the retention rate for early PJI is much higher than that for late PJI.
a proper randomized controlled trial; based on a total hip prosthesis with or without hydroxyapatite-coating with one identical geometry; primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty; and used objective, validated clinical and radiographic outcome measurements.
