Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-Cell Tumour (d-TGCT) of large joints is a rare, locally aggressive, soft tissue tumour affecting predominantly the knee. Previously classified as Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS), this monoarticular disease arises from the synovial lining and is more common in younger adults. Given the diffuse and aggressive nature of this tumour, local control is often difficult and recurrence rates are high. Current literature is comprised primarily of small, and a few larger but heterogeneous, observational studies. Both arthroscopic and open synovectomy techniques, or combinations thereof, have been described for the treatment of d-TGCT of the knee.

There is, however, no consensus on the best approach to minimize recurrence of d-TGCT of the knee. Some limited evidence would suggest that a staged, open anterior and posterior synovectomy might be of benefit in reducing recurrence. To our knowledge, no case series has specifically looked at the recurrence rate of d-TGCT of the knee following a staged, open, posterior and anterior approach. We hypothesized that this approach may provide better recurrence rates as suggested by larger more heterogeneous series.

A retrospective review of the local pathology database was performed to identify all cases of d-TGCT or PVNS of the knee treated surgically at our institution over the past 15 years. All cases were treated by a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncology surgeon, using a consistent, staged, open, posterior and anterior approach for synovectomy. All cases were confirmed by histopathology and followed-up with regular repeat MRI to monitor for recurrence. Medical records of these patients were reviewed to extract demographic information, as well as outcomes data, specifically recurrence rate and complications. Any adjuvant treatments or subsequent surgical interventions were noted.

Twenty-three patients with a minimum follow-up of two years were identified. Mean age was 36.3 at the time of treatment. There were 10 females and 13 males. Mean follow-up was seven and a half years. Fourteen of 23 (60.9%) had no previous treatment. Five of 23 had a previous arthroscopic synovectomy, one of 23 had a previous combined anterior arthroscopic and posterior open synovectomy, and three of 23 had a previous open synovectomy. Mean time between stages was 87 days (2.9 months). Seven of 23 (30.4%) patients had a recurrence. Of these, three of seven (42.9%) were treated with Imatinib, and four of seven (57.1%) were treated with repeat surgery (three of four arthroscopic and one of four open).

Recurrence rates of d-TGCT in the literature vary widely but tend to be high. In our retrospective study, a staged, open, anterior and posterior synovectomy provides recurrence rates that are lower than rates previously reported in the literature. These findings support prior data suggesting this approach may result in better rates of recurrence for this highly recurrent difficult to treat tumour.

Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-Cell Tumour (d-TGCT) of large joints is a rare, locally aggressive, soft tissue tumour affecting predominantly the knee. Previously classified as Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS), this monoarticular disease arises from the synovial lining and is more common in younger adults. Given the diffuse and aggressive nature of this tumour, local control is often difficult and recurrence rates are high. Current literature is comprised primarily of small, and a few larger but heterogeneous, observational studies. Both arthroscopic and open synovectomy techniques, or combinations thereof, have been described for the treatment of d-TGCT of the knee.

There is, however, no consensus on the best approach to minimize recurrence of d-TGCT of the knee. Some limited evidence would suggest that a staged, open anterior and posterior synovectomy might be of benefit in reducing recurrence. To our knowledge, no case series has specifically looked at the recurrence rate of d-TGCT of the knee following a staged, open, posterior and anterior approach. We hypothesized that this approach may provide better recurrence rates as suggested by larger more heterogeneous series.

A retrospective review of the local pathology database was performed to identify all cases of d-TGCT or PVNS of the knee treated surgically at our institution over the past 15 years. All cases were treated by a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncology surgeon, using a consistent, staged, open, posterior and anterior approach for synovectomy. All cases were confirmed by histopathology and followed-up with regular repeat MRI to monitor for recurrence. Medical records of these patients were reviewed to extract demographic information, as well as outcomes data, specifically recurrence rate and complications. Any adjuvant treatments or subsequent surgical interventions were noted.

Twenty-three patients with a minimum follow-up of two years were identified. Mean age was 36.3 at the time of treatment. There were 10 females and 13 males. Mean follow-up was seven and a half years. Fourteen of 23 (60.9%) had no previous treatment. Five of 23 had a previous arthroscopic synovectomy, one of 23 had a previous combined anterior arthroscopic and posterior open synovectomy, and three of 23 had a previous open synovectomy. Mean time between stages was 87 days (2.9 months). Seven of 23 (30.4%) patients had a recurrence. Of these, three of seven (42.9%) were treated with Imatinib, and four of seven (57.1%) were treated with repeat surgery (three of four arthroscopic and one of four open).

Recurrence rates of d-TGCT in the literature vary widely but tend to be high. In our retrospective study, a staged, open, anterior and posterior synovectomy provides recurrence rates that are lower than rates previously reported in the literature. These findings support prior data suggesting this approach may result in better rates of recurrence for this highly recurrent difficult to treat tumour.

Classification systems for the reporting of surgical complications have been developed and adapted for many surgical subspecialties. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the variability and frequency of reporting terms used to describe complications in ankle fracture fixation. We hypothesized that the terminology used would be highly variable and inconsistent, corroborating previous results that have suggested a need for standardized reporting terminology in orthopaedics.

Ankle fracture outcome studies meeting predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for analysis by two independent observers. Terms used to define adverse events were identified and recorded. If a difference occurred between the two observers, a third observer was enlisted. Results of both observers were compared. All terms were then compiled and assessed for variability and frequency of use throughout the studies involved. Reporting terminology was subsequently grouped into 10 categories.

In the 48 studies analyzed, 301 unique terms were utilized to describe adverse events. Of these terms, 74.4% (224/301) were found in a single study each. Only one term, “infection”, was present in 50% of studies, and only 19 of 301 terms (6.3%) were used in at least 10% of papers. The category that was most frequently reported was infection, with 89.6% of studies reporting on this type of adverse event using 25 distinct terms. Other categories were “wound healing complications” (72.9% of papers, 38 terms), “bone/joint complications” (66.7% of papers, 35 terms), “hardware/implant complications” (56.3% of papers, 47 terms), “revision” (56.3% of papers, 35 terms), “cartilage/soft tissue injuries” (45.8% of papers, 31 terms), “reduction/alignment issues” (45.8% of papers, 29 terms),“medical complications” (43.8% of papers, 32 terms), “pain” (29.2% of papers, 16 terms) and “other complications” (20.8% of papers, 13 terms). There was a 78.6% interobserver agreement in the identification of adverse terms across the 48 studies included.

The reporting terminology utilized to describe adverse events in ankle fracture fixation was found to be highly variable and inconsistent. This variability prevents accurate reporting of adverse events and makes the analysis of potential outcomes difficult. The development of standardized reporting terminology in orthopaedics would be instrumental in addressing these challenges and allow for more accurate and consistent outcomes reporting.

Purpose and Background:

To identify treatment effect modifiers within the STarT Back Trial which demonstrated prognostic stratified care was effective in comparison to standard care for patients with low back pain.