Current practice in the UK is to perform clinical follow up and CXR on patients with sarcomas with the use of cross-sectional imaging reserved for high clinical suspicion of recurrence. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of this policy by investigating patients who developed local recurrence (LR) after previous treatment of a bone or soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Additionally, we aimed to determine whether size and extent of LR at diagnosis of recurrence affected subsequent management. We reviewed clinical records and imaging of all patients in the previous 5 years (01/01/2005–01/07/2010) with diagnosed LR to investigate: how it was diagnosed, site and size of recurrence and management. A value judgement was made as to whether earlier diagnosis may have altered treatment and/or outcome.Introduction
Method
