Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1597 - 1601
1 Dec 2011
Walter WL Kurtz SM Esposito C Hozack W Holley KG Garino JP Tuke MA

This multicentre study analysed 12 alumina ceramic-on-ceramic components retrieved from squeaking total hip replacements after a mean of 23 months in situ (11 to 61). The rates and patterns of wear seen in these squeaking hips were compared with those seen in matched controls using retrieval data from 33 ‘silent’ hip replacements with similar ceramic bearings. All 12 bearings showed evidence characteristic of edge-loading wear. The median rate of volumetric wear was 3.4 mm3/year for the acetabular component, 2.9 mm3/year on the femoral heads and 6.3 mm3/year for head and insert combined. This was up to 45 times greater than that of previously reported silent ceramic-on-ceramic retrievals. The rate of wear seen in ceramic components revised for squeaking hips appears to be much greater than in that seen in retrievals from ‘silent’ hips.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 429 - 429
1 Nov 2011
Zingde SM Leszko F Komistek RD Garino JP Hozack WJ Dennis DA Mahfouz MR
Full Access

Previous clinical studies have documented the incidence of squeaking in subjects having a ceramic-onceramic (COC) THA. An in vivo sound sensor was recently developed used to capture sound at the THA interface. In this first study, it was determined that subjects having all bearing surface types demonstrated variable sounds. Therefore, in this follow-up study, the overall objective was to simultaneously capture in vivo sound and motion of the femoral head within the acetabular cup during weight-bearing activities for subjects implanted with one of four different ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) THA.

Twenty subjects, each implanted with one of four types of Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA (9 Smith and Nephew, 8 Stryker, 2 Wright Medical Technologies and 1 Encore) were analyzed under in vivo, weightbearing conditions using video fluoroscopy and a sound sensor while performing gait on a treadmill. Patients were pre-screened and two groups were defined: a group diagnosed as audible squeakers (9 THAs) and a control group of THA patients not experiencing audible sounds (11 THAs). Two tri-axial piezoelectric accelerometers were attached to the pelvis and the femoral bone prominences respectively. The sensors detect frequencies propagating through the hip joint interaction. Also, 3D kinematics of the hip joint was determined, with the help of a previously published 2D-to-3D registration technique. In vivo sound was then correlated to 3D in vivo kinematics to determine if positioning of the femoral head within the acetabular cup is an influencing factor.

For the audible group, two had a Smith and Nephew (S& N) THA, six a Stryker THA and one a Wright Medical (WMT) THA. Both of the S& N subjects, 5/6 Stryker and the Wright Medical subjects experienced femoral head separation. The maximum separation for those subjects was 4.6, 5.0 and 2.1 mm for the S& N, Stryker and WMT subjects, respectively. The average separation was 4.3, 2.0 and 2.1 mm for the S& N, Stryker and WMT subjects, respectively. For the eleven subjects in the control group, seven subjects had a S& N THA, two a Stryker and one each having a WMT and Encore THA. All 11 of these subjects demonstrated hip separation with the maximum values being 3.8, 3.4, 1.9 and 2.4 mm for the S& N, Stryker, WMT and Encore THA, respectively. The average separation values were 1.8, 2.3, 1.9 and 2.4 mm for the S& N, Stryker, WMT and Encore THA subjects, respectively.

Four distinct sounds were produced by subjects in this study, which were squeaking, knocking, clicking and grating. Only 3/20 subjects produced a “squeaking” sound that was detected using our sound sensor. One of these subjects had a Stryker THA and two had a WMT THA. Further analysis of the nine subjects who were categorized as audible squeakers revealed that only 0/2, 1/6 and 1/1 subjects having a S& N, Stryker and WMT THA, respectively, demonstrated a squeaking sound that was detected using our sound sensor. Both (2/2) S& N subjects demonstrated a knocking and clicking sound, but neither produced a grating sound, while 5/6 Stryker subjects produced a knocking sound, but only 1/6 demonstrated a clicking or grating sound. Besides the squeaking sound, the only other sound produced by the WMT audible squeaker was a knocking sound. Only 1/11 control group subjects demonstrated a squeaking sound, which was a subject having a WMT THA. With respect to the control group subjects having a S& N THA, 5/7, 1/7 and 3/7 subjects produced a knocking, clicking or grating sound, respectively. Only 1/2 subjects having a Stryker THA produced a knocking or grating sound.

This is the first study to compare multiple COC THAs in analyzing correlation of femoral head separation (sliding) and sound. It was seen that all the THA groups had occurrences of separation and each case of separation correlated with the sound data. These results lead the authors to believe that the influence of squeaking is multi-factorial, and not necessarily attributed only to the bearing surface material.