Complex fractures of the femur and tibia with associated severe soft tissue injury are often devastating for the individual. The aim of this study was to describe the two-year patient-reported outcomes of patients in a civilian population who sustained a complex fracture of the femur or tibia with a Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) of ≥ 7, whereby the score ranges from 2 (lowest severity) to 11 (highest severity). Patients aged ≥ 16 years with a fractured femur or tibia and a MESS of ≥ 7 were extracted from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (January 2007 to December 2018). Cases were grouped into surgical amputation or limb salvage. Descriptive analysis were used to examine return to work rates, three-level EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) outcomes at 12 and 24 months post-injury.Aims
Methods
Acetabular fractures in older adults lead to a high risk of mortality and morbidity. However, only limited data have been published documenting functional outcomes in such patients. The aims of this study were to describe outcomes in patients aged 60 years and older with operatively managed acetabular fractures, and to establish predictors of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). We conducted a retrospective, registry-based study of 80 patients aged 60 years and older with acetabular fractures treated surgically at The Alfred and Royal Melbourne Hospital. We reviewed charts and radiological investigations and performed patient interviews/examinations and functional outcome scoring. Data were provided by the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR). Survival analysis was used to describe conversion to THA in the group of patients who initially underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with conversion to THA.Aims
Methods
In this study, we aimed to determine whether designation as a
major trauma centre (MTC) affects the quality of care for patients
with a fracture of the hip. All patients in the United Kingdom National Hip Fracture Database,
between April 2010 and December 2013, were included. The indicators
of quality that were recorded included the time to arrival on an
orthopaedic ward, to review by a geriatrician, and to operation.
The clinical outcomes were the development of a pressure sore, discharge
home, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and re-operation within
30 days. Aims
Patients and Methods
We describe the routine imaging practices of
Level 1 trauma centres for patients with severe pelvic ring fractures, and
the interobserver reliability of the classification systems of these
fractures using plain radiographs and three-dimensional (3D) CT
reconstructions. Clinical and imaging data for 187 adult patients
(139 men and 48 women, mean age 43 years (15 to 101)) with a severe
pelvic ring fracture managed at two Level 1 trauma centres between July
2007 and June 2010 were extracted. Three experienced orthopaedic
surgeons classified the plain radiographs and 3D CT reconstruction
images of 100 patients using the Tile/AO and Young–Burgess systems.
Reliability was compared using kappa statistics. A total of
115 patients (62%) had plain radiographs as well as two-dimensional
(2D) CT and 3D CT reconstructions, 52 patients (28%) had plain films
only, 12 (6.4%) had 2D and 3D CT reconstructions images only, and
eight patients (4.3%) had no available images. The plain radiograph
was limited to an anteroposterior pelvic view. Patients without
imaging, or only plain films, were more severely injured. A total
of 72 patients (39%) were imaged with a pelvic binder Interobserver reliability for the Tile/AO (Kappa 0.10 to 0.17)
and Young–Burgess (Kappa 0.09 to 0.21) was low, and insufficient
for clinical and research purposes. Severe pelvic ring fractures are difficult to classify due to
their complexity, the increasing use of early treatment such as
with pelvic binders, and the absence of imaging altogether in important
patient sub-groups, such as those who die early of their injuries. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to determine predictors of persisting moderate/severe pain post orthopaedic injury. Data were obtained from patients presenting to the two adult level 1 trauma centres in Victoria, Australia between August 2003 and August 2004. The maximum self reported pain levels at discharge and at 6 months post injury were determined using 11-point visual analogue scales (VAS). Moderate/severe pain was defined as a VAS score of 5 or greater. Associations between categorical variables were determined using chi-square tests and adjusted using multivariate logistic regression to determine possible predictors of persistent pain. Data were obtained from 742 patients (age 15–100 years, 60.7% male). 37.1% had moderate/severe pain 6 months post injury. Moderate/severe pain at discharge was associated with an increased risk (OR 2.46 (95%CI 1.72–3.52), p<
0.0001) and isolated upper extremity injuries were associated with a reduced risk (OR 0.43 (95%CI 0.24–0.75), p=0.003) of moderate/severe pain 6 months post injury. Age (p=0.98), gender (p=0.37) and the presence of multiple orthopaedic (p=0.76) or non-orthopaedic injuries (p=0.58) were not predictors of moderate/severe pain 6 months post injury. The severity of pain at discharge was the main predictor of moderate/severe pain 6 months following orthopaedic trauma. Further studies are needed to determine if improving pain control prior to discharge can reduce the incidence of persistent pain following orthopaedic injury.
Although the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was designed, and has been validated, as a measure of disability in patients with disorders of the upper limb, the influence of those of the lower limb on disability as measured by the DASH score has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to investigate whether it exclusively measures disability associated with injuries to the upper limb. The Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, a general musculoskeletal assessment instrument, was also completed by participants. Disability was compared in 206 participants, 84 with an injury to the upper limb, 73 with injury to the lower limb and 49 controls. We found that the DASH score also measured disability in patients with injuries to the lower limb. Care must therefore be taken when attributing disability measured by the DASH score to injuries of the upper limb when problems are also present in the lower limb. Its inability to discriminate clearly between disability due to problems at these separate sites must be taken into account when using this instrument in clinical practice or research.
