The introduction of new treatments needs to be both clinically effective and cost effective. Clinicians tend to be unaware of the importance of the latter, and how health economic assessments are undertaken, especially in a public health system where the inclusion of funded treatments is made on a national basis. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost savings from a societal perspective in the use of recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein -2 (rhBMP-2) in grade III A and B open tibia fractures treated with a locked intramedullary nail and soft-tissue management in the UK, Germany, and France. Healthcare system (direct healthcare costs) and costs for productivity losses (indirect health-care costs) were calculated using the raw data from the Bone Morphogenetic Protein Evaluation Group in Surgery for Tibial Trauma “BESTT study”. Return-to-work time for estimation of productivity losses was assumed to correspond with the time of fracture healing. For calculation of secondary interventions costs and productivity losses the respective 2007/08 national tariffs for surgical procedures and average national wages for the UK, Germany, and France were used. From a societal perspective, overall savings per case of €7911 for the UK, €9270 for Germany, and €9291 were calculated. Those savings largely offset the upfront price of rhBMP-2 of €2266(£1,790) in the UK, €2970 in Germany, and €2950 in France. Total net savings can be estimated to be €9.6 million for the UK, €14.5 million for Germany, and €11.4 million for France. For all three countries reduced productivity losses are the key driver for the overall savings. In summary, despite the apparent high direct cost of rhBMP-2 in grade III A and B open tibia fractures, at a national level there are net cost-savings from a societal perspective for all three countries.

Introduction: The addition of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) showed significant reduction of secondary intervention, fracture healing time and infection rates compared with intramedullary nailing alone in open tibia fractures. However, the upfront price of approx. 3000 € is a barrier to its regular use. The goal of the study was to determine potential cost savings and cost-effectiveness of rhBMP-2 in grade III open tibia fractures from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and the German Health Care System and to derive conclusions for other European health care systems.

Materials and Methods: Clinical data from a previously published randomised controlled study with 450 patients (“BESTT study”) were used to generate total treatment costs for each patient for the control and the 1.5 mg/ml BMP-2 group based on the current German-DRG and the NHS for UK. The analysis was performed from a health care system and a societal perspective for a one year time horizon. Furthermore, assessment of the cost-effectiveness of BMP-2 was done by utility analysis.

Results: The use of BMP-2 for grade III open tibia fractures is leading to cost savings of 3183 € per case and, therefore, to net savings for the German health care system. The main driver for cost savings is faster fracture healing with faster resumption of work and reduced expenses for sickness leave payments. For the UK rhBMP-2 is a cost-effective strategy with a cost-effectiveness ratio of approx. £11,000/QALY which is well below the standard £30,000 benchmark for the NHS. From a societal perspective, rhBMP-2 is a cost-saving treatment.

Conclusions: BMP-2 leads to net savings in grade III open tibia fractures in Germany which can be expected for other European countries where sickness payments are provided by health care insurers. For countries like UK where sickness are provided by third parties BMP-2 is a cost-effective treatment strategy from a health care system perspective and a cost-saving treatment from a societal perspective.