Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures suffer from poor interobserver agreement, and their value in preoperative assessment to guide surgical fixation strategies is limited. For tibial plateau fractures four major characteristics are identified: lateral split fragment, posteromedial fragment, anterior tubercle fragment, and central zone of comminution. These fracture characteristics support preoperative assessment of fractures and guide surgical decision-making as each specific component requires a respective fixation strategy. We aimed to evaluate the additional value of 3D-printed models for the identification of tibial plateau fracture characteristics in terms of the interobserver agreement on different fracture characteristics.

Preoperative images of 40 patients were randomly selected. Nine trauma surgeons, eight senior and eight junior registrars indicated the presence or absence of four fracture characteristics with and without 3D-printed models. The Fleiss kappa was used to determine interobserver agreement for fracture classification and for interpretation, the Landis and Koch criteria were used.

3D-printed models lead to a categorical improvement in interobserver agreement for three of four fracture characteristics: lateral split (Kconv = 0.445 versus K3Dprint = 0.620; P < 0.001), anterior tubercle fragment (Kconv = 0.288 versus K3Dprint = 0.449; P < 0.001) and zone of comminution (Kconv = 0.535 versus K3Dprint = 0.652; P < 0.001).

The overall interobserver agreement improved for three of four fracture characteristics after the addition of 3D printed models. For two fracture characteristics, lateral split and zone of comminution, a substantial interobserver agreement was achieved.

Fracture characteristics seem to be a more reliable way to assess tibial plateau fractures and one should consider including these in the preoperative assessment of tibial plateau fractures compared to the commonly used classification systems.

Summary

In contrast to the current literature, myofibroblasts are not present in chronic posttraumatic elbow contractures.

However, myofibroblasts are present in the acute phase after an elbow fracture and/or dislocation. This suggests a physiological role in normal capsule healing and a potential role in the early phase of posttraumatic contracture formation.

Summary

Quantification of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography (Q3DCT) is a reliable and reproducible technique to quantify and characterise ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment (www.traumaplatform.org). This technique could be useful to characterise posterior malleolar fragments associated with specific ankle fracture patterns.

Summary

Biomechanical studies comparing fixation constructs are predictable and do not relate to the significant clinical problems. We believe there is a need for more careful use of resources in the lab and better collaboration with surgeons to enhance clinical relevance.

Background: A recent study found that after median term follow-up disability correlated with pain rather than the limited residual impairments in motion and strength. We studied impairment and disability an average of twenty-one years after injury in a cohort of Dutch patient, with the hypothesis that both impairment and disability would be lower in patients that were skeletally immature at the time of injury.

Methods: Seventy-one patients were evaluated an average of 21 years after injury. The majority of the 35 skeletally immature patients were treated conservatively with closed reduction and cast immobilization and the majority of the 36 skeletally mature patients were treated with plate and screw fixation. Objective evaluation included radiographs and measurements of range of motion and grip strength. Questionnaires were used to measure arm-specific disability (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand: DASH), misinterpretation or over interpretation of pain (Pain Catastrophizing Scale-PCS-), and depression (CES-D). Multivariable analysis of variance and multiple linear regression were used to compare patients that were skeletally mature and immature at the time of injury and to identify predictors of arm-specific disability (SPSS 17.0, SPSS inc., Chicago).

Results: There were 44 men and 27 women with a an average age of forty-one at time of follow-up (range, 20 to 81). Fractures were classified as AO/OTA-type A3 in 46 patients (simple), B3 in 18 (including wedge fragment) and C fractures in 7 patients (comminuted). The average DASH score was 8 points (0 to 54) and 73% reported no pain. Both rotation and wrist flexion/extension were 91% of the uninjured side; grip strength was 94%. There were small, but significant differences in rotation (151 versus 169 degrees, p=0.004) and wrist flexion/extension (123 versus 142 degrees, p=0.002), but not disability between skeletally mature and immature patients. The best predictors of DASH score were nerve damage, pain and grip strength, explaining 56% of the variation in DASH scores. Disability did not correlate with depression or misconceptions about pain.

Conclusions: Twenty-one years after initial fracture, both skeletally immature and mature patients have limited impairment (averaging over 90% motion and grip strength) and disability after non operative and operative treatment respectively. Patients that were skeletally immature at the time of injury had better motion, but comparable disability. Disability correlated with pain rather than motion, but did not correlate with psychosocial measures.

Background: Complex fractures of the tibial plateau can be difficult to characterize on plain radiographs and two-dimensional computed tomography scans. We tested the hypothesis that three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions improve the reliability of tibial plateau fracture characterization and classification.

Methods: Forty-five consecutive intra-articular fractures of the tibial plateau were evaluated by six independent observers for the presence of six fracture characteristics that are not specifically included in currently used classification schemes:

posteromedial shear fracture;

In addition, fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA Comprehensive Classification of Fractures, the Schatzker classification system and the Hohl and Moore system. Two rounds of evaluation were performed and then compared. First, a combination of plain radiographs and two-dimensional computed tomography scans (2D) were evaluated, and then, four weeks later, a combination of radiographs, two-dimensional computed tomography scans, and three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans (3D) were assessed.

Results: Interobserver agreement improved for all classification systems after the addition of three-dimensional reconstructions (AO/OTA κ2D = 0.536 versus κ3D = 0.545; Schatzker κ2D = 0.545 versus κ3D = 0.596; Hohl and Moore κ2D = 0.668 versus κ3D = 0.746).

Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions also improved the average intraobserver reliability for all fracture characteristics, from κ2D = 0.624 (substantial agreement) to κ3D = 0.687 (substantial agreement). The addition of three-dimensional images had limited infiuence on the average interobserver reliability for the recognition of specific fracture characteristics (κ2D = 0.488 versus κ3D = 0.485, both moderate agreement). Three-dimensional computed tomography images improved interobserver reliability for the recognition of coronal plane fractures from fair (κ2D = 0.398) to moderate (κ3D = 0.418) but this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Three-dimensional computed tomography is helpful for;

individual orthopaedic surgeons for preoperative planning (improves intraobserver reliability for the recognition of fracture characteristics), and for

Background: Traditionally, non-displaced scaphoid fractures are considered by most as stable with predictable rates of healing with conservative treatment. There is a current trend in orthopedic practice, however, to treat non- or minimal displaced fractures with early open reduction and internal fixation. This trend is not evidence based. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we pool data from trials comparing surgical and conservative treatment for acute scaphoid fractures, thus aiming to summarize the best available evidence.

Methods: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and reference list of articles, and contacted researchers in the field. We selected eight randomized controlled trials comparing surgical versus conservative interventions for acute scaphoid fractures in adults. Data were pooled using fixed-effects and randomeffects models with standard mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables respectively. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed with Forest plots and calculation of the I2 statistic.

Results: Four-hundred seventeen patients were included in eight trials (205 fractures were treated surgically and 212 conservatively). Most trials lacked scientific rigor. Four studies assessed functional outcome with validated physician- and patient-based outcome instruments. With the numbers available (200 patients), we found a significant difference according to our primary outcome measure, standardized patient-based outcome in favor of surgical treatment (p< 0.0001). With regard to our secondary parameters, we found heterogeneous results that favored surgical treatment for grip strength, time to union and time off work. In contrast we found no significant differences between surgical and conservative treatment for pain, range of motion, rate of nonunion, malunion, and infection, rate of complications, and total treatment costs.

Conclusions: Patient-rated functional outcome and satisfaction as well as time to return to function favored surgical treatment for acute scaphoid fractures. However, there is no evidence from prospective randomized controlled trials on physician-rated functional outcome, radiographic outcome, complication rates and treatment costs to favor surgical or conservative treatment for acute scaphoid fractures.

Background: Extra-articular fractures of the distal radius in children are most often treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate long term (> 12 years follow-up) objective and subjective outcomes in a consecutive series of pediatric patients treated with closed reduction with standardized outcome instruments. We hypothesized that children treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization have little or no objective functional impairment in later life and therefore subjective factors are the strongest determinants of outcome.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients with an average age at time of injury of 9 years (range, five to sixteen years) were evaluated at an average of twenty-one years (range, twelve to twenty seven years) after injury (patients aged 21 to 39) after closed reduction of an extra-articular distal radius fracture. Patients were evaluated using 2 physician-based evaluation instruments (modified Mayo wrist score; MMWS, and the Sarmiento modification of the Gartland and Werley score; MGWS) and an upper extremity-specific health status questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; DASH) questionnaire. Radiographic measurements were also made. Multivariable analysis of variance and multiple linear regression modelling were used to identify the degree to which various factors affect variability in the scores derived with these measures.

Results: All fractures had healed without significant loss of alignment. Final functional results according to the MGWS were rated as excellent or good in all patients. The average MMWS score was 90 points, and the median DASH score was 0 points. Twenty patients (74%) considered themselves pain free. Bivariate analysis revealed pain -as rated according to scales used in the MMWS- and age at time of injury to be correlated with DASH scores, with pain as the only independent predictor of patient-based outcome in multivariable analysis. This explains almost three quarters of the variability in DASH scores. Pain, range of motion, and radiographic measurement of radial length correlated with the physician based scoring system MMWS;

Conclusions: Twenty-one years after injury 96% of patients have a satisfactory outcome according to physician-based MMWS categorical ratings and patient-based DASH scores. It is remarkable that pain explained 74% of the variation in DASH scores. Perhaps when there is very little impairment, subjective factors are more important determinants of disability.

Background: It is well established that unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius may require operative treatment to restore alignment and that failure to restore alignment often leads to wrist and forearm dysfunction. There is ongoing debate in the literature whether or not there is a strict relationship between the quality of anatomical reconstruction and functional outcome. We hypothesize that there is no difference in objective- and subjective functional outcome between patients with AO type B versus more complex AO type C fractures.

Methods: Ninety-four patients with an average age of 42 years (range, 20 to 78 years) at the time of injury were evaluated an average of 20 years (range, 8 to 32 years) after treatment of an intra-articular distal radius fracture. At long-term follow-up patients were evaluated using a physician-based evaluation instruments (modified Mayo wrist score; MMWS and an upper extremity-specific health status questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; DASH) questionnaire. Objective and subjective functional outcome of patients with AO Type B and AO Type C fractures were compared.

Results: An average of 20 years after injury (average age 62 years, range 35 to 90), all fractures healed without significant loss of alignment. There was no difference in physician based outcome measure according to the Mayo score between 17 patients with 18 AO type B fractures (average, 80,3 points; range 45 to 100) and 27 patients with 31 AO type C fractures (average, 75.9 points; range 10 to 95, p=0.42). Differences in subjective DASH scores were not statistically significant either (p = 0.47); average 13 points for Type B patients (range, 0 to 58 points) and an average of 16 points for Type C patients (range, 0 to 71 points).

Groups were statistically comparable. No statistical differences were found in flexion extension arc (average 103 degrees, range 10 to 145 degrees), pronation supination arc (average 150 degrees, range 0 to 180 degrees) or radial ulnar deviation (average 52 degrees, range 0 to 85 degrees), as well as grip strength and osteoarthritis (all p> 0.05)

Conclusions: Twenty years after injury 67% of patients have a satisfactory outcome according to physician-based MMWS categorical ratings. There is no difference in functional long term outcome between patient with more extensive intra-articular comminution (type C fractures) and AO type B fractures. This is consistent with previous long term outcome studies with similar methodology; when more complex injuries are not correlated with decreased long term functional outcome, other (subjective) factors are more important determinants of disability.

Background: This study tested the null hypothesis that computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have the same diagnostic performance characteristics for triage of suspected scaphoid fractures.

Methods: Thirty-four consecutive patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture (post-injury tenderness of the scaphoid and normal radiographs) underwent CT and MRI within ten days after trauma. CT-reconstructions were made in planes defined by the long axis of the scaphoid. The reference standard for a true fracture of the scaphoid was 6-week follow-up radiographs in four views, based on current literature. A panel including surgeons and radiologists came to a consensus diagnosis for each type of imaging considered in a randomized and blinded fashion, independent of the other types of imaging. We calculated sensitivity, specificity and accuracy as well as positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for both imaging modalities.

Results: According to the reference standard there were six true fractures of the scaphoid (prevalence 18%). CT diagnosed fracture of the scaphoid in five patients (15%), with one false positive, two false negative and four true positive results. MRI diagnosed a fracture in seven patients (21%), with three false positive, two false negative and four true positive results. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for CT were 67%, 96% and 91%; and for MRI 67%, 89% and 85% respectively. According to the McNemar test for paired binary data for each imaging modality these differences were not significant. The positive predictive values using Bayes’ formula were 76% for CT and 54% for MRI. Negative predictive values were 94% for CT and 93% for MRI.

Conclusions: CT and MRI had comparable diagnostic characteristics. Both were subject to both false positive and false negative interpretations. They were better to rule out a fracture than to rule one in. The best reference standard for a true fracture is debatable