header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 95 - 95
1 Mar 2012
OUTCOME OF AO CANNULATED SCREWS FOR THE FRACTURE NECK OF FEMUR IN 412 PATIENTS DONE OVER A 5 YEAR PERIOD WITH A MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP OF TWO YEARS
Sahu A Harshavardena N Maret S Dhir A Taylor H
Full Access
View article

Introduction

The aim of the study was to analyze the outcome of AO cannulated screws for fractures neck of femur at our institute.

Methods

412 patients (101 males/311 females) who underwent AO screws for fracture neck of femur over 5 years (2000 -2004) and followed-up for a minimum of 2 yrs formed the study population. A retrospective review of data from electronic patient record (EPR), clinical coding, clinic and GP letters was made. Age, residential placement, Garden's classification, mode of injury, associated comorbidities, pre-admission mobilisation status, allergies, addictions and anticoagulation status details were collected. Reasons for re-admissions, re-operations and comorbidities developing as a result of these interventions were critically analysed. Post-op physiotherapy, proportion of patients sustaining contra-lateral fracture NOF and its management and mortality statistics were reviewed.

Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 417 - 417
1 Sep 2009
CLINICAL CODING & REIMBURSEMENT ISSUES IN KNEE SURGERY
Maret S Harshavardhana N Dhir A Sahu A Olyslaegers C Hartley R
Full Access
View article

Purpose: To review the existing coding for knee surgery and ascertain its appropriateness & accuracy for surgical procedures, associated co-morbidities and complications.

Methods: A retrospective review of 100 consecutive knee surgeries (50 arthroplasties and 50 arthroscopies) performed between July-August 2007 was undertaken. The coding data excel sheet and comprehensive hospital records were analysed.

Results: The accuracy of primary procedural codes was 100% & 88% respectively for arthroplasty & arthroscopy. However this respectively fell down to 56 & 60% when the accuracy for entire description of surgical procedure was taken into consideration. The procedural codes did not specifically reflect the surgery performed and lacked reproducibility esp. for arthroscopies. In arthroplasties, patients had similar codes irrespective of whether they had patellar resurfacing or not. Co-morbidities were coded appropriately in 24% of arthroplasty & 36% of arthroscopy patients. The common co-morbidities missed were drug allergies, hypercholesterolemia, heart conditions (IHD, MI, AF, valvular pathologies) and h/o malignancy & deep vein thrombosis. Post-op adverse events were coded in only 2/5 arthroplasties (40%) and 0/3 arthroscopies (0%) respectively.

Conclusion: Coding is a universal language of communication amongst healthcare professionals. Its accuracy is important not just for reimbursement but also for data quality and audit. Coding database also serves as a powerful research tool. The financial implications with respect to generation of appropriate reimbursement i.e. healthcare resource group (HRG) codes (which are dictated by official population and census survey procedural [OPCS4.4] & international classification of diseases [ICD–10] co-morbidity codes) are discussed. The limitations of the existing coding system are highlighted and discussed. Literature emphasizes on the qualification of coders, legible & comprehensive documentation of surgeries & co-morbidities by treating physicians and regular interaction between coders and clinicians. Reimbursement for arthroscopy is less in the NHS unlike in BUPA where it is on par with open surgeries.