Introduction – Electronic storage of X-rays is becoming standard. It would therefore, be highly desirable to use a computer as a tool for obtaining useful measurements from radiographs. The current study investigates the reliability of computerised measurements of radiographs of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow.

Materials and Methods – 56 AP radiographs of Souter-Strathclyde Elbows were assessed for the parameters described by Trail et al (1999). The respective x-rays were digitised using a transparency flatbed scanner with a resolution of 80 ï m/pixel. The radiographs were then measured for the migration and movement of the prosthesis using the following lines: Hapd1, Hapd2, Hapd3 Hapd4. All the radiographs were measured twice manually with at least one week interval, the observer being blind to the initial results at the time of the second measurement. The x-rays were again measured twice using the computer and a measuring software developed in our own department. The results were analysed for intra observer variability, using paired t-test and Pearson correlations.

Results – Table 1 shows the results of the paired measurements, with the confidence intervals for the mean error, the p for the paired t-test and the correlations between the paired readings. M1 and M2 represent the manual readings, while C1 and C2 the computerised readings.

Conclusions – The mean error of all paired readings was below 1 mm. The correlation between all paired readings was highly significant, with all the paired readings with the computer as a tool being .99. The only difference that was statistically significant was Hapd3M1-M2, between two manual measurements, although the mean error is not clinically relevant, still being less than 1mm. We conclude that computerised measurements of radiographs are at least as reliable as those conducted directly on film.

Objectives: The current study evaluates the effectiveness of a direct access physiotherapy shoulder clinic, in terms of a faster treatment, levels of patient satisfaction and consultants workload relief.

Material and Methods: A protocol of management of shoulder Pain was created establishing the patients pathway from general practice to orthopaedic surgery. A clinical specialist physiotherapist was trained to lead a shoulder clinic. A course on injections taught by consultants was followed by a training period of 10 supervised injections. After this initial period, a letter was sent to all GPs in the area informing that patients could be referred direct to the physio-shoulder clinic. Patients coded for consultation were also re-directed to that clinic. Only patients who did not improve after the initial treatment or who presented more complicate screening problems were redirected through a short cut to the consultant led clinic. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was used during the first 5 months.

Results Over the first 2 years of the project, 203 patients were appointed to the open shoulder clinic. The first 60 patients were given the patient satisfaction questionnaire, with 47 returning it completed. 28 of the 47 had been seen by a physio before. In a satisfaction scale of 1 to 5, 2 graded 3, 3 graded 4 and 42 graded 5 the advice received about their condition. In a similar scale 2 patients rated 3, 2 rated 4 and 43 rated 5 regarding their satisfaction with the opportunity to discuss their treatment/care options. Regarding arrangements for further care, 1 rated 1, 2 rated 3, 6 rated 4 and 36 rated 5. For overall satisfaction 1 rated 2, 2 rated 3, 2 rated 4 and 42 rated 5. Positive aspects of patients feedback included ample time to ask questions, improvement obtained with early start of treatment and more accessible discussion. 47% of the patients attending were followed up by Physiotherapy only, 18% were added directly to the surgical waiting list and 4 were referred for rheumatology. 22% were sent for further tests such as MRI and USS. The waiting list for a first appointment in our upper-limb clinic was reduced from 46 weeks in 2001 to 36 weeks in 2003. Not a single patient insisted on seeing a consultant and 38% of the patients were discharged without specifically seeing one.

Conclusion This study shows that a physio screening shoulder clinic is an effective and satisfactory way to reduce waiting times and improve patient care.

Introduction: Electronic storage of X-rays is becoming standard. It would therefore, be highly desirable to use a computer as a tool for obtaining useful measurements from radiographs. The current study investigates the reliability of computerised measurements of radiographs of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow.

Materials and Methods: 56 AP radiographs of Souter-Strathclyde Elbows were assessed for the parameters described by Trail et al (1999). The respective x-rays were digitised using a transparency flatbed scanner with a resolution of 80 _m/pixel. The radiographs were then measured for the migration and movement of the prosthesis using the following lines: Hapd1, Hapd2, Hapd3 Hapd4. All the radiographs were measured twice manually with at least one week interval, the observer being blind to the initial results at the time of the second measurement. The x-rays were again measured twice using the computer and a measuring software developed in our own department. The results were analysed for intra observer variability, using paired t-test and Pearson correlations.

Results: Table 1 shows the results of the paired measurements, with the confidence intervals for the mean error, the p for the paired t-test and the correlations between the paired readings. M1 and M2 represent the manual readings, while C1 and C2 the computerised readings.

Conclusions: The mean error of all paired readings was below 1 mm. The correlation between all paired readings was highly significant, with all the paired readings with the computer as a tool being .99. The only difference that was statistically significant was Hapd3M1-M2, between two manual measurements, although the mean error is not clinically relevant, still being less than 1mm. We conclude that computerised measurements of radiographs are at least as reliable as those conducted directly on film.

The Souter-Strathclyde total elbow has been used in our unit since 1989. The current study reviews the results of the first 10 years of practice and compares them with reported results. Pain relief, complication rate, functional outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

The primary indication for replacement was pain in the presence of advanced rheumatoid destruction of the joint on radiography, classified according to Souter (1989). Complications had been dealt with as appropriate, reviewed retrospectively and classified according to Dent et al (1995). Pain, activities of daily living and overall satisfaction were assessed by questionnaire. They were measured clinically for range of movement, power, stability and elbow performance using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Follow up x-rays were assessed for evidence of loosening. Fifty elbows were replaced in 43 patients, 34 female and nine male. There were 24 right and 26 left elbows. All patients had rheumatoid arthritis; one patient had an associated traumatic injury to the elbow. The pre-operative radiographs available for review were 10 grade 3, 12 grade 4 and 17 grade 5. The mean age of the patients was 65 years (range: 33–83 years). The average follow up was five years (range: 1-10 years). Fourteen patients died and one was lost to follow up, leaving 33 elbows in 28 patients. There were 12 complications, eight were type A, four elbows had a transient radial palsy, three had ulnar neuritis and there was one pressure sore. The only type B complication was a persisting subluxation in extension. There were three type C complications with early revision, a humeral fracture revised to a humeral resection implant, a subluxated joint revised to an ulnar retentive prosthesis and one deep infection revised to an excision arthroplasty. Twenty-four had no pain, six had occasional pain, one got pain with heavy use and two had pain at night. For ADL, two patients could not reach their mouth with difficult feeding and five had trouble toileting. All were able to dress themselves and turn taps. The preoperative range motion was 110° (±23.1°) Flex., 40° (±11.5°) Ext., 45° (±12.2°) Pron., and 46° (±36.9°) Sup. Postoperatively the mean ranges were 131° (±13.1°) Flex., 32° (±16°) Ext., 81° (±14°) Pron. and 72° (±32°) supination. By the Mayo performance score 67% had excellent results, 8% had good results, 17% fair and 8% poor. 67% of patients were extremely pleased with their results and only one was dissatisfied. No elbows had radiological evidence of loosening requiring revision.

There was substantial pain relief and an increase in the range of motion. The number of complications was acceptable and the patient satisfaction level was very high. The Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty is an appropriate option in rheumatoid patients with elbow destruction.