The in vivo evaluation of patellofemoral contact pressures in a posterior stabilized compared to posterior cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A prospective descriptive non randomized study was performed on 8 patients. A standard approach to a TKA was performed using a balanced gap technique, while the patella was prepared for a resurfacing. The trial components for the posterior stabilized (PS) TKA where inserted including the gas sterilized pressure transducer (a patella button). Soft tissue was approximated and the knee was taken through full range of movement. Patellofemoral pressure was measured and captured continuously through the full range of movement. The posterior cruciate sacrificing (CS) components were inserted into the same patient and the procedure repeated. In addition, anterior translation of the tibia relative to the femur was measured at 90 degrees. The transducer was removed and final components, including a patella resurfacing were inserted.Purpose Of Study
Methods
The literature is unclear about the optimal rotation of the femoral component during TKR. Measured resection techniques rely on the use of bony landmarks, while the balanced gap technique relies on soft tissue tensioning to guide the surgeon in rotating the femoral component. All these techniques still result in a wide range of component rotation. We compared the functional flexion axis (FFA) of 20 replaced knees to that of the contralateral normal knee to determine whether a balanced gap technique allowed us to recreate this normal anatomy. We reviewed the records of our TKR's from Jan 2008 to Dec 2010 and included all patients who had a normally functioning contralateral knee, tibial cut <3° from perpendicular to the mechanical axis performed by/under supervision of a single surgeon. These patients were contacted for follow up and axial flexed knee x-rays to measure femoral rotation and FFA (angle between clinical transepicondylar line and mechanical axis of tibia). These values were compared between replaced and normal knees using Students T-test.Background:
Methods:
The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of a cementless acetabular cup without bone grafting in a cohort of patients with protrusio acetabuli who were treated with total hip arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed the records of a cohort of 45 patients with protrusio acetabuli who received elective total hip replacements between 2009 and 2011 at Tygerberg Academic Hospital. We reviewed pre- and post-operative radiographs and the most recent follow-up radiographs (minimum of three months) to assess cup osteointegration. We classified protrusio acetabuli according to Sotelo-Garza and Charnley into mild, moderate and severe, by evaluating pre-operative radiographs.Purpose
Methods
To assess acetabular component fixation by bone ongrowth onto a titanium plasma sprayed surface as used in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular bone defects, a common finding in revision surgery, and their relation to outcome were also investigated. Clinical and radiological results were evaluated for all revision total hip replacements done between 2006 and 2011 that included the use of a specific revision acetabular component. Forty six hips in 46 patients were followed for an average of 2.5 years (range8 months to 6 years). The acetabular defects were graded according to Paprosky's classification.Purpose
Methods