The aim was to assess the value of the GP 6–8 week hip examination.

In a 15-year prospective observational longitudinal cohort study, every infant referred by the GP with suspected pathological developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) had their hip joints clinically and sonographically examined in a specialist hip screening clinic. Graf Type IV and dislocated hips were classified as pathological. Screening failures were defined as those who had not been identified by the 6–8 week check and presented with late instability. Secondary univariate and multivariable analysis was performed to determine which clinical findings are predictive of instability.

64,518 infants underwent the 6–8 week GP check. Of 176 referrals, 5 had pathological hips. 13 screening failures, presented between the ages of 17 and 80 weeks. The 6–8 week check has a sensitivity of 28% and a specificity of 99.7%.

Univariate analysis revealed positive Ortolani tests and patients referred as ‘unstable hip’ to be significant predictors of hip pathology. Clicky hips, asymmetric skin creases, and leg length inequality were not predictive of pathological hips. A multivariable model showed a positive Ortolani test to be the sole independent predictor of instability at 6–8 weeks.

This is the first attempt to test the validity of the 6–8 week GP clinical hip check. A low rate of hip pathology was identified. The high rate of false negatives raises questions about the value of screening at this age. At 6–8 weeks, clinical signs of hip instability are unreliable as hips become irreducible and stiff.

Based on our findings, we recommend that at 6–8 weeks, referrals are only made if the Ortolani test is positive. We advocate the reintroduction of the 8-month check, including an assessment for limited hip abduction, which may improve the detection rate of those missed by initial screening.

Aims:

To assess the success rate of closed reduction after failing Pavlik harness for treatment of DDH.

The practice of regular radiological follow-up of infants with a positive family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip is based on the widespread belief that primary acetabular dysplasia is a genetic disorder which can occur in the absence of frank subluxation or dislocation. We reviewed all infants who were involved in our screening programme for developmental dysplasia of the hip, between November 2002 and January 2004, and who had a normal clinical and ultrasound examination of the hip at six to eight weeks of age, but who, because of a family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip, had undergone further radiography after an interval of 6 to 12 months. The radiographs of 89 infants were analysed for signs of late dysplasia of the hip and assessed independently by three observers to allow for variability of measurement. There were 11 infants (11%) lost to follow-up.

All the patients had normal radiographs at the final follow-up and none required any intervention. We therefore question the need for routine radiological follow-up of infants with a positive family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip, but who are normal on clinical examination and assessment by ultrasound screening when six to eight weeks old.

Two protocols for the operative technique and care of the pin-site with external fixation were compared prospectively. There was a total of 120 patients with 46 in group A and 74 in group B. Infection was defined as an episode of pain or inflammation at a pin site, accompanied by a discharge which was either positive on bacterial culture or responded to a course of antibiotics.

Patients in group B had a lower proportion of infected pin sites (p = 0.003) and the time to the first episode of infection was longer (p < 0.001). The risk of pin-site infection is lower if attention is paid to avoiding thermal injury and local formation of haematoma during surgery and if after-care includes the use of an alcoholic antiseptic and occlusive pressure dressings.