The purpose of this study was to assess the variability in implant position between sides in patients who underwent staged, bilateral THA and whether variation from one side to the other affected patient-reported outcomes.

A retrospective review was conducted on 207 patients who underwent staged, bilateral THA by the same surgeon from 2017–2022. Leg length, acetabular height, cup version, and coronal and sagittal stem angles were assessed radiographically and compared to the contralateral THA. Surgical approach and technology utilization were further assessed for their impact on variability. Linear regression was used to model the relationship between side-to-side variability and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS).

Between sides, mean radiographic leg length varied by 4.6mm (0.0–21.2), acetabular height varied by 3.3mm (0.0–13.7), anteversion varied by 8.2° (0.0 to 28.7), coronal stem alignment varied by 1.1° (0.0 to 6.9), and sagittal angulation varied by 2.3° (0.0 to 10.5). The anterior approach resulted in more variability in stem angle position in both the coronal (1.3° vs. 1.0°, p=0.036) and sagittal planes (2.8° vs. 2.0° p=0.012) compared to the posterior approach. The posterior approach generally led to more anteversion than the anterior approach. Use of robotics or navigation for acetabular positioning did not increase side-to-side variability in cup-related position or leg length. Despite considerable side-to-side variability, Hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome scores (HOOS JR) were not affected by higher levels of position inconsistency.

Staged, bilateral THA results in considerable variability in component position between sides. The anterior approach leads to more side-to-side variability in sagittal stem angle and cup anteversion than the posterior approach. Navigation and robotics do not improve the consistency of component position in bilateral THA. Variation in implant position was not associated with differences in PROMs, suggesting that despite variability, patients can tolerate these differences between sides.

Introduction

The use of technology, such as navigation and robotic systems, may improve the accuracy of component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) but its impact on patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) remains unclear. This study aims to identify the association between intraoperative use of technology and patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Background

The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model was implemented in April-2016 to standardize cost and improve quality of care for two of the most commonly billed inpatient procedures for Medicare patients, total knee and total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare one institution's predicted savings and losses under the CJR model with actual savings and losses after two years of implementation and discuss new methods to maintain savings.

We investigated whether a novel, real-time fluoroscopy based navigation system optimized component positioning and leg length in fluoroscopically aided Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty (DAA-THA). We retrospectively reviewed 75 fluoroscopically assisted DAA-THA performed by a single surgeon: 37 procedures used the software intraoperatively to overlay anteversion, inclination, and leg length information over the existing fluoroscopic radiograph with the aim of enhancing component positioning. The control group consisted of 38 procedures from the single surgeon's patient pool who had undergone non-navigated fluoroscopic assisted DAA-THA one month prior to the system's trial. We used the software to compute each data point on an immediate post operative AP radiograph to replicate the intra operative measurement process. Our results demonstrate that the navigation group measurements were significantly closer to the target numbers with less variation. The mean values were significantly closer to target values anteversion (control: 14°, navigated: 19.1°), inclination (control: 37.7°, navigated: 40.8°) and leg length discrepancy (control: 4.7mm, navigated: 0.1mm). The mean difference from target value were also statistically significant: for anteversion (control: −6.0°, navigated: −0.9°), inclination (control: −2.3°, navigated: 0.8°) and leg length discrepancy (control: 2.7°, navigated: −1.9°). In addition, surgical time was shorter in the navigation group (75.7 vs. 74 minutes; p=0.001). The p values were all statistically significant (anteversion 0.0001, inclination 0.0019, LLD < 0.001 and surgical time 0.001). The real-time feedback and calculations provided by the navigation software provided a reproducible precision for component positioning and leg length measurement during DAA-THA.

For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly.

INTRODUCTION

Proponents of the THA anterior approach have advocated for the use of dedicated surgical tables similar to those used in lower extremity fracture care that allow for traction, rotation, and angulation of the limb during surgery. Some tables require a specially-trained assistant to manipulate the table, whereas some may be manipulated by the surgeon. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent THA through an anterior approach on an assistant-controlled (AC) versus a surgeon-controlled (SC) table.

Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) candidates have received high doses of opioids within the perioperative period for the management of surgical pain. Healthcare systems have responded by improving opioid administration documentation and are now implementing opioid-sparing protocols (OSP) into THA integrated care pathways (ICP). Here we evaluate the effectiveness of a novel OSP in primary THA at out institution.