Purpose of the study: The purpose of this paper was to report our experience with arthroscopic treatment of tendon-related epicondylalgia resistant to well-conducted medical treatment and the long-term outcomes. From September 2000 to January 2008, 25 consecutive patients underwent arthroscopic treatment performed by the same surgeon. Twenty-two patients were available for follow-up. We reviewed 26 interventions.

Material and methods: An endoarticular technique was used, with section of the lateral capsule then the extensor carpi radialis brevis and the extensor digitorum communis. Mean patient age was 45 years (36–55); five patients had work accidents (one bilateral case). Patients were assessed clinically using the Mayo Clinic Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and for pain at rest, during daily life activities and during exercise (scale 0–10).

Results: Mean follow-up was 51 months (17.6–88.7). Pain was scored 0.38 at rest, 0.81 for daily life activities, and 4.11 for exercise. Mean function score was 90/100. Two patients underwent revision. Sixteen patients (62%) stated they were « much better », six « better » (23%) and four unchanged (15%). Twenty-one patients (81%) were satisfied, 23 would request the same procedure (88%). There was no statistically significant difference in the subgroup of work accidents versus the other patients with p=1.35 for pain at rest; p=0.51 for pain during daily life activities, p=0.37 for pain during exercise. Two minor complications (skin burn, subcutaneous infection) were observed.

Discussion: The results show improvement postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was correlated with the clinical results and the function score. Treatment of resistant epicondylalgia remains a very controversial issue; several surgical techniques have been described with good or even excellent results. Arthroscopic treatment, inspired by the work of Kuklo, was adopted by Baker, Owens and Jerosch. Our results are equivalent to those of other arthroscopy series. Longer time before resumption of occupational activities can be explain in our opinion by the greater number of patients with an occupational accident in our series.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic resection yields satisfactory results which are sustained over time, for the treatment of resistant epicondylalgia. It is an alternative to open surgery.

Disruption of the interosseous membrane is easily missed in patients with Essex-Lopresti syndrome. None of the imaging techniques available for diagnosing disruption of the interosseous membrane are completely dependable.

We undertook an investigation to identify whether a simple intra-operative test could be used to diagnose disruption of the interosseous membrane during surgery for fracture of the radial head and to see if the test was reproducible.

We studied 20 cadaveric forearms after excision of the radial head, ten with and ten without disruption of the interosseous membrane. On each forearm, we performed the radius joystick test: moderate lateral traction was applied to the radial neck with the forearm in maximal pronation, to look for lateral displacement of the proximal radius indicating that the interosseous membrane had been disrupted. Each of six surgeons (three junior and three senior) performed the test on two consecutive days.

Intra-observer agreement was 77% (95% confidence interval (CI) 67 to 85) and interobserver agreement was 97% (95% CI 92 to 100). Sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 97 to 100), specificity 88% (95% CI 81 to 93), positive predictive value 90% (95% CI 83 to 94), and negative predictive value 100%).

This cadaveric study suggests that the radius joystick test may be useful for detecting disruption of the interosseous membrane in patients undergoing open surgery for fracture of the radial head and is reproducible. A confirmatory study in vivo is now required.

Purpose of the study: Treatment of irrepable massive rotator cuff tears remains a controversial issue. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiological outcome in patients with a reversed shoulder prosthesis used for the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears with or without associated glenohumeral osteoarthritic degeneration.

Material and methods: Between 1996 and 2002, 55 reversed shoulder prostheses were implanted via a superolateral approach. Mean follow-up of the 15 men and 40 women (mean age 73 years, age range 57–86 years) was 34.8 months (range 24–84 months). The supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons were retracted to the glenoid and ruptured in 100% of the patients: 27 shoulders (49%) also presented a infrascapularis tear. Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (Fukuda IV and V) was persent in 29 patients. Postoperatively, patients were assessed with the Constant score and radiographically on plain x-rays.

Results: Three patients were excluded from the analysis because of implant infection and removal before review. Subjectively, 90% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied. All items of the Constant score improved significantly (p< 0.0001). Active elevation improved from 65° to 123°. External rotation was not improved. Radiographically, there wre 41 shoulders with a grade 0, 1 or 2 notch (Nerot system), and 11 with a grade 3 or 4 notch. Thirteen patients (25%) presented heterotopic ossifications.

Discussion and conclusion: In this context, the clinical results obtained with this prosthesis are much better than with any other type of arthroplasty. Radiographically, heterotopic ossifications have a significant impact on the Constant score (p=0.015). Presence of ta glenoid notch is signifiantly associated with use of a medialized or retaining polyethylene cup (p< 0.0001). For us, loosening of the metaglenoidglenosphere bloc is related to the progression of the glenoid notch. For these reasons, it would be preferable to reserve this type of arthroplasty for patients aged over 70 years presenting an irreparable massive cuff tear with satisfactory glenoid bone stock sufficient for obtaining a good anchor for the metaglen. We recommend only using lateralized polyethylene cups.

Purpose of the study: Sports activities requiring antepulsion, adduction and medial rotation can favor the development of posterior instability of the shoulder. Conservative treatment is indicated, but many techniques have been proposed in case of failure. All do not allow recovery of the same sports level. We report our experience with six cases of posterior shoulder instability treated with a Gosset posterior bone block.

Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases treated between 1974 and 1995. Six athletes, aged 17 to 34 years (mean 25 years) underwent posterior bone block surgery using the Gosset procedure on their dominant shoulder. Three of the patients had experienced involuntary dislocation and three others involuntary and voluntary dislocation. One patient had a multidirectional hyperlaxity. Five patients had participated in rehabilitation programs for at least five months. Two patients had undergone unsuccessful bone block surgery in another unit.

Results: Stability and pain relief were achieved in all cases. Three patients recovered complete mobility. In the three others, mean limitation of mobility for the different sectors was 15°. There has been no sign of osteoarthrosis at three years follow-up. All patients have resumed their sports activities, three at the same level.

Discussion: In our experience, most surgical techniques proposed for the treatment of posterior shoulder instability are unsuccessful. The Gosset iliac bone block prolongs the articular surface. After consolidation, it allows sports activities requiring shoulder force and provides satisfactory mobility.

We performed a prospective study on 96 patients with extra-articular or intra-articular fractures of the distal radius with a dorsally displaced posteromedial fragment. After closed reduction, we compared trans-styloid fixation and immobilisation with Kapandji fixation and early mobilisation. Forty-two patients of mean age 57.1 years +/- 18.1 (SD) were treated by trans-styloid K-wire fixation and 45 days of short-arm cast immobilisation. Fifty-four patients of mean age 57.7 years +/- 18.7 (SD) had Kapandji fixation and immediate mobilisation according to the originator. All the patients had clinical and radiological review at about six weeks and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the operation. Pain, range of movement and grip strength were tested clinically, and changes in dorsal tilt, radial tilt, ulnar variance, and radial shortening were assessed radiologically. Statistical analysis was applied to comparisons with the normal opposite wrist. Pain and reflex sympathetic dystrophy were more frequent after Kapandji fixation and early mobilisation, but the range of motion was better although this became statistically insignificant after six weeks. The radiological reduction was better soon after Kapandji fixation, but there was some loss of reduction and increased radial shortening during the first three postoperative months. The clinical result at two years was similar in both groups.