Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 297 - 297
1 Nov 2002
Bensahel (Paris) H Kuo (Chicago) K Duhaime (Montreal) M
Full Access

Purpose: In order to improve our understanding of club-foot, an international rating system of evaluation is proposed which is supported by the International Club Foot Study Group (ICFSG).

Method: All the parameters of the assessment shall be objective. They are clinical and radiographic. On the clinical side, the morphology of foot is assessed for the hindfoot, midfoot and the forefoot. Then, the global morphology of the foot and lower limb is assessed. But the function of the foot is the major criteria which enhances the value of the outcome. It is assessed on the passive motion of the different parts of the foot. Then, the active motion is evaluated. Arc added a clinical gait analysis and the occurrence of eventual pain. On the radiographic side, the various angles of bones axes are calculated on AP and lateral views.

Results: The score of Outcome Evaluation ranges from 0 up to 60 points, the latter expressing the worst result. Four groups of results are mentioned so as excellent, good, fair and poor. The Outcome Evaluation should be performed at 6 years old and at the end of the growth.

Conclusion: The Outcome Evaluation will allow us to be able to compare truly the forthcoming series of club-foot.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 6 | Pages 1041 - 1041
1 Nov 1997
HAMDY RC FASSIER F NAUDIE D DUHAIME M


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 1 | Pages 58 - 65
1 Jan 1997
Naudie D Hamdy RC Fassier F Morin B Duhaime M

We reviewed retrospectively 22 patients (23 limb segments) with fibular hemimelia treated by amputation or limb lengthening to evaluate these methods of treatment. There were 12 boys and 10 girls, all with associated anomalies in the lower limbs. Twelve patients (13 limb segments) had early amputation and prosthetic fitting and ten had tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov technique.

At the latest follow-up, the twelve patients who had amputation were functioning well and had few complications. The ten patients who had lengthening had suffered numerous complications, and all had needed either further corrective surgery or to wear braces or shoe-raises. Two of the ten lengthened limbs required late amputation for poor function or cosmesis. There were fewer hospital admissions, clinic visits, and periods of absence from school in the amputation group.

Our findings suggest that amputation is a more effective method of management than limb-lengthening in severe fibular hemimelia. The Ilizarov method is an attractive alternative for selected patients, but its exact role is not yet established. One problem is that families often have unrealistic expectations of the surgical and prosthetic technology available and may refuse amputation when this has been recommended.