High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a common treatment for medial compartment arthritis of the knee in younger, more active patients. The HTO shifts load away from the degenerative medial compartment and into the lateral compartment. This change can be accomplished with either a lateral closing or a medial opening wedge HTO. An HTO also potentially affects leg length. Mathematical models predict that the osteotomy type (opening versus closing) and the magnitude of the correction determine the change in leg length, but no in vivo studies have been published. The purpose of this study is to quantify and compare leg length change following opening and closing wedge HTO. Retrospective cohort study – Level III evidenceIntroduction:
Study Design:
Appropriate positioning of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components is a key concern of surgeons. Post-operative varus alignment has been associated with poorer clinical outcome scores and increased failure rates. However, obtaining neutral alignment can be challenging in cases with significant pre-operative varus deformity 1) In patients with pre-operative varus deformities, does residual post-operative varus limb alignment lead to increased revision rates or poorer outcome scores compared to correction to neutral alignment? 2) Does placing the tibial component in varus alignment lead to increased revision rates and poorer outcome scores? 3) Does femoral component alignment affect revision rates and outcome scores? 4) Do these findings change in patients with at least 10 degrees of varus alignment pre-operatively?Background:
Questions:
For many patients, UKA is a good alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Strong evidence that gender influences outcomes following UKA could alter UKA selection criteria. No prior series has been specifically designed and matched to compare outcomes based on gender. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of gender on the clinical outcome of UKA while controlling for other variables that may affect outcome. Between 1988 and 2006, 257 UKA's were carried out in our department. We studied two groups of 40 patients of each gender, matched by pre-operative clinical and radiological presentation, and with post-operative follow up of at least 2 years. The mean age at operation was 71 years and the mean follow-up was 5.9 years. In both groups, IKS score improved significantly. When comparing the male and female groups post-operatively, no significant differences were found between IKS knee or function scores, limb alignment, or the incidence of radiolucent lines. No difference was found between groups in terms of range of motion or radiologic progression of arthritis. Both tibial (p<0.001) and femoral (p<0.001) component sizes were significantly larger in the male group than the female group. For males, the size of both the femoral (r2=0.12, p=0.033) and tibial (r2=0.29, p=0.0005) components correlated with patient height. For females, the size of neither the femoral (r2=0.000082, p=0.96) nor tibial (r2=0.0065, p=0.63) components correlated with patient height. The key finding in this study is that when patients are selected for UKA according to specific selection criteria (including avoiding performance of UKA in younger patients and patients over 85 kg), gender is not a predictor of outcome based on IKS scores. When using these selection criteria, gender should not be considered when determining whether to perform a UKA.
