header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 470 - 470
1 Sep 2012
Hirschfeld M Cano JR Cruz E Guerado E
Full Access

Introduction

Hip fracture is a worldwide problem, not only as far as epidemiology is concerned but also regarding economical issues. Surgery is the current standard treatment. However owing to age, and patients co-morbidities complications are common. Surgical site infection is directly related to operative procedure, and surgeons' experience may be very important when making plans for outcome improvement. In this paper we study the role of hip surgeons versus general orthopaedic surgeons in relation to postoperative site infection. Operative hypothesis determines that hip surgeons have less infection rates than general orthopaedic surgeons. Null hypothesis that infection rates are rather the same.

Material and Methods

In a prospective controlled cohort study 820 patients presenting with a hip fracture were randomizelly operated on by a group of orthopaedic surgeons of the same Hospital Department. Patients were then classified according to surgeons adscription either to a Hip Unit (Group A=215 cases) or not (Group B=605). Variables studied included age, gender, treatment (osteosynthesis or joint replacement), co-morbidities (according to Charlson, s index), and infection rate. Fisher, and Ranksum statistical tests, and simple and multiple logistic regression, for univariate and multivariate, analysis was performed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 86 - 86
1 Mar 2005
Cruz-Ocaña E Rodríguez-García MA Taillefer GG Guerado-Parra E
Full Access

Introduction and purpose: Cases of unstable extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur should be treated by endomedullary nailing; the PFN (Synthes) nail has proved to be a good option for this approach. The purpose of our paper is to make a descriptive study analyzing the medical and technical complications derived from the use of the PFN nail.

Materials and methods: This study reviews a consecutive series of 432 patients implanted with a PFN, out of whom 352 have had a follow-up longer than 6 months. Mean age is 76.3 years and the male/female ratio is 2:1. An analysis was made of the variables related to medical complications inherent in the fracture itself and in the patient characteristics (AO fracture type, ASA surgical risk, organic complications, infection risk factors, duration of hospital stay and mortality) and to secondary mechanical complications caused by implant design or the surgical technique chosen (implant protrusions, system cutting out, osteolysis and intraoperative and postoperative fractures propagated from the tip of the implant).

Results: We performed a frequency analysis and an exponential chi square study which told us that the most frequent fracture was type A2 (AO classification) and the most frequent patient type was ASA III (ASA classification). Mean hospital stay was 6.66 days. During follow-up, medical complications were 17.5% and mechanical ones 11%.

Conclusions: The PFN nail is an efficient means for treating extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur although its use is not free from complications, which could be minimized by employing a careful surgical technique. We found that there is a direct relationship between surgical success and patient ASA type.