Methods

All primary cemented (hemi-)arthroplasties for acute hip fractures and cemented aseptic hip or knee revision arthroplasties, were incorporated in 3 datasets. All registered implants between 2007 and 2018 were included (minimum 2 years follow-up). Primary end-point was subsequent revision rates for infection and for any reason in the single and dual ABLC groups.

Cumulative crude incidence of revision was calculated using competing risk analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on treatment and outcome of FRI. All studies in English that described surgical patient series for treatment of FRI were included, using Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Publications before 1990 and studies that did not describe FRI patient treatment or did not report original data (e.g., reviews or meta-analyses) were excluded. Study selection and data collection were done by two authors independently. Main collected parameters were preoperative cultures, use of local antibiotics, postoperative antibiotic protocol, cultured microorganisms, and overall outcome of treatment, i.e., eradication of infection and bony union, recurrence, amputations, revisional surgery, and number of complications. Dichotomous data were pooled using Medcalc, and weighted means were calculated for continuous data using Excel.

Method

We used data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register(LROI) and selected all primary THA and TKA in the period 2007–2016 who underwent a DAIR within 12 weeks after primary procedure. A DAIR was defined as a revision for infection in which only modular parts were exchanged. A DAIR was successful if not followed by a re-revision within 1 year after DAIR. The analyses were separated for THA and TKA procedures.

Method

The four most often cultured bacterial species found in FRI were used; Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter cloacae. For each species, four different isolates were obtained, each with a different susceptibility for gentamicin. This susceptibility, expressed in the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), varied from completely susceptible (MIC 0,064 mg/L – 4mg/L), minimal resistance (4mg/L – 16mg/L), moderate resistance (8 mg/L – 96 mg/L) to high resistance (24 mg/L - >1024 mg/L), depending on each different organism. Antimicrobial activity of Cerament-G^® was determent by a Kirby-Bauer test, according to the EUCAST disc protocol. Each test was done in five-fold for each of the 16 cultured isolates, four of each species. The zone of inhibition (ZOI), obtained by the test, was compared between each bacterial isolate and within each of the four separate species.