Though retear rates following rotator cuff repair are well established, we set out to review current literature to determine when early retears occurred (defined as <12m following surgery), and examine which pre- and post-operative variables might affect outcome. Pubmed, Medline, and CINAHL were searched for literature published from 2011 to 2021 using specific search terms. The inclusion criteria were studies reporting retear rates within 12 months of initial surgical repair. Exclusionary criteria were studies that included partial thickness tears, and studies that did not use imaging modalities within 12 months to assess for retears. PRISMA guidelines were followed, identifying a total of 10 papers. A combined total of 3372 shoulders included (Mean age 56 −67 years). The most common modality used to identify early retears were ultrasound scan and MRI. 6 of the 10 studies completed imaging at 0-3 months, 6 studies imaged at 3-6 months and 6 studies imaged at 6-12 months. Across all studies, there was a 17% early retear rate (574 patients). Of these, 13% occurred by 3 months, whilst the peak for retears occurred at 3-6 months (82%) and 5% occurred at 6-12 months. The risk of retear was higher in larger tears and extensive tendon degeneration. All studies apart from one documented a return to work/sport at 6 months post-operatively. Postoperative rehabilitation does not appear to alter retear rate, although data is limited with only 1 of 10 studies allowing active range of movement before 6 weeks. Retorn tendons had poorer functional outcomes compared to intact tendons at 12m following initial repair. The majority of early retears occur at 3-6 months and this time period should be prioritised both in rehabilitation protocols and future research. Age, tear size, and tendon degeneration were found to influence likelihood of early retears.
Postoperative pain control in shoulder surgery is challenging even in arthroscopic procedures. Acute postoperative pain can last up to 48hrs despite using multimodal analgesia. Different techniques have been used to control acute pain following shoulder surgery. The most common technique currently used in shoulder surgery at the elective orthopaedic centre in Leeds is a combination of general anaesthetic (GA) and interscalene block (ISB). ISB maybe very effective, however, carries many risks and potential side effects such as brachial plexus injury and paralysis of the vagus and laryngeal recurrent nerves as well as cervical sympathetic nerve and pneumothorax. ISB can also be associated with higher incidence of neurological deficit compared to other peripheral nerve blocks; up to 14% at 10 days in some cases. As such we decided to examine the use of ISB for achieving pain control in our elective unit. A prospective consecutive series of 217 patients undergoing shoulder surgery were studied. These were grouped into 10 groups. All procedures were arthroscopic apart from shoulder arthroplasty procedures such as hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder replacements (TSRs). The choice of regional anaesthesia was ISB with GA as standard practice. Visual analogue scores (VAS) at 0hrs, 1hr, 2hrs, 4hrs and 6hrs; and total opiates intake were recorded. A one-way single factor ANOVA was used as preferred statistical analytical method to determine whether there is a difference in VAS scores and total opiates intake amongst the groups. Postoperative analgesics were used for pain relief, although these were not standardised.Introduction and Objective
Materials and Methods
Patients most at risk of osteoporosis are post-menopausal women. However, for many such women, presentation of osteoporosis is only made following their first fragility fracture. Often in the UK, osteoporosis investigation occurs following discharge, and any subsequent secondary prevention starts in the community. This may result in patients with osteoporosis not being investigated or not receiving correct prophylactic treatment. 143 post-menopausal women (av. age 77.7 years) starting secondary osteoporosis prophylaxis following fragility fractures requiring operative intervention were included in this retrospective study. Osteoporosis was defined by DEXA scan using the WHO criteria (122 hip fractures and 21 wrist fractures), following the UK's national guidelines for osteoporosis prophylaxis. Treatment was started following discussion and explanation of treatment with each patient, and either commenced by the surgical team during the acute hospital admission with the fracture, or in an out-patient setting within 6 weeks of the fracture by an orthopaedic specialist nurse. To check compliance, either the patient themselves or the patients' family physician was contacted. Results showed that 120 of the women (83.9%, 102 hip fractures, and 18 wrist fractures) were still compliant with secondary osteoporosis prophylaxis at an average follow-up of 200 days (5 hip fractures lost to follow-up, 0 wrist fractures). 12 women with hip fractures died (0 wrist fractures), and 6 women stopped taking their prophylaxis (3 hip fractures, 3 wrist fractures): 4 for medical reasons, and 2 for unknown reasons. No women sustained further fractures. Few studies have previously investigated compliance of osteoporosis secondary prevention, and our results compare favorably. We therefore recommend the prompt commencement of secondary prevention treatment by the orthopaedic surgical team following osteoporotic fractures.
