Both mobile bearing and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have demonstrated clinical success. However, much debate persists about the superiority of a single design. Currently most clinical data is based on high volume centers data, however to reduce bias, we undertook a through review of retrospective national joint registries. In this study, we aim to investigate UKA implant utilization and survivorship between 2000 and 2018. Ten annual joint registry reports of various nations were reviewed. Due to the variable statistical methods of reporting implant use and survivorship we focused on three registries: Australia (AOANJRR), New Zealand (NZJR), United Kingdom (NJR) for uniformity. We evaluated UKA usage, survivorship, utilization and revision rates for each implant. Implant survivorship was reported in the registries and was compared within nations due to variation in statistical reporting.Introduction
Methods
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to improve limb alignment, component positioning, and soft-tissue balance, yet the effect of adoption of this technology has not been established. This study was designed to evaluate whether robotic-assisted TKA leads to improved patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient satisfaction as compared to conventional TKA at 3 and 12 months. This IRB-approved single-surgeon retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data compared 113 conventional TKA patients with 145 imageless robotic-assisted TKA patients (Navio™ Surgical System, Smith&Nephew®, Memphis TN). Basic demographic information, intraoperative and postoperative data, and PROMs (SF-P, SF-M, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC Physical Function, KSS) were collected and recorded preoperatively, at 3 months, and at 12 months following surgery. Range of motion (ROM), blood loss, surgical duration, and complication rates between groups were also collected. Continuous measures such as mean difference in PROMs and ROM were compared using unpaired t-tests. Categorical measures such as the percentage of patients with complications were compared using chi-square analysis.Introduction
Methods
The success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) necessitates precise osteotomies and soft tissue balancing to realign the lower extremity to a neutral mechanical axis. While technological advances have facilitated precise osteotomies, soft tissue balancing has traditionally relied mostly on surgeons’ subjective and variable tactile feedback. As soft tissue imbalance accounts for 35% of early TKA revisions in North America, we aimed to compare outcomes when TKA was balanced free-hand versus a sensor-guided balancing device (VERASENSE, OrthoSensor, Inc (Dania, FL)). In a randomized-controlled fashion, patients underwent primary TKA soft tissue balancing either free-hand or with VERASENSE (Orthosensor Inc, Dania FL) at our institution beginning January 2018. With VERASENSE, soft-tissue balancing is considered when the pressure difference between the medial and lateral knee compartments was less than 15 pounds. Data regarding patient-reported outcomes, knee range of motion (ROM), pain level, opioid consumption, inpatient ambulation distance, length of stay (LOS), and incidence of arthrofibrosis was collected and analyzed in a two-year minimum follow-up and target patient goal of 120 patients.Introduction
Methods
