High-quality clinical research in children’s orthopaedic surgery
has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. This study used
a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for clinical
trials in children’s orthopaedics. A modified Delphi technique was used, which involved an initial
scoping survey, a two-round Delphi process and an expert panel formed
of members of the British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery.
The survey was conducted amongst orthopaedic surgeons treating children
in the United Kingdom and Ireland.Aims
Methods
The aim was to assess contemporary management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) by surveying members of the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS). A questionnaire with 5 case vignettes was used. Two questions examined the timing of surgery for an acute unstable SCFE in a child presenting at 6 hours and at 48 hours after start of symptoms. Two further questions explored the preferred method of fixation in mild and severe stable SCFE. The final question examined the management of the contralateral normal hip. Responses were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and the data w analysed using a chi-squared test. The response rate was 56% (110/196). 88.2% (97/110) responded that if a child presented with an acute unstable SCFE within 6 hours, they would treat it within 24 hours of presentation, compared with 40.9% (45/110) for one presenting 48 hours after the onset of symptoms (P<0.0001). 52.6% (58/110) of surveyed BSCOS members would offer surgery for an unstable SCFE between 1 and 7 days after onset of symptoms. Single screw fixation in situ was advocated by 96.4% (106/110) and 70.9% (78/110) while corrective osteotomy was preferred by 1.8% (2/110) and 26.4% (29/110) of respondents for the mild and the severe stable slips respectively (P<0.0001). Surgeons preferring osteotomy are more likely to perform an intracapsular technique. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral normal hip was performed by 27.3% (30/110) of participants. There are significant differences in opinions between BSCOS members as to the optimal management of SCFE in children. This reflects the variable recommendations and quality in the current scientific literature. Further research is therefore required to determine best practice and enable consensus to be reached.
The long term results of closed reduction of the hip for DDH were reviewed to determine if the presence of the ossific nucleus had an effect on outcome. The clinical and radiological outcome of a single-surgeon series of closed reduction for DDH was assessed in a strictly defined group of 48 hips in 42 patients with an average of 11.1 years follow up. In 50% of cases, the ossific nucleus was absent. 100% of patients had an excellent or good result (Severin classification) at final follow-up. 8.3% (4 hips) demonstrated evidence of avascular necrosis. Three were Kalamchi & MacEwen Type I and one was type II. Two of the AVN cases did not demonstrate an ossific nucleus at closed reduction, and both developed type I AVN. 6 hips underwent further surgery. The acetabular index and center-edge angle were not significantly different between the affected and unaffected hip at final follow-up. There was no relationship between the presence or absence of an ossific nucleus at the time of closed reduction and the final outcome. In this well defined group, closed reduction is safe and provides excellent results in the long-term. The absence of an ossific nucleus is not detrimental to the final outcome.
