Hip arthroplasty is considered common to patients aged 65 and over however, both Jennings, et al., (2012) and Bergmann (2016) found THA patients are substantially younger with more patients expecting to return to preoperative activity levels. With heavier, younger, and often more active patients, devices must be able to support a more demanding loading-regime to meet patient expectations. McClung (2000) demonstrated that obese patients can display lower wear-rates with UHMWPE bearing resulting from post-operative, self-induced reduced ambulatory movement, thus questioning if obese kinematics and loading are indeed the worst-case. Current loading patterns used to test hip implants are governed by ISO 14242-1 (2014). This study aimed to characterize a heavy and active population (referred to as HA) and investigate how the gait profile may differ to the current ISO profile. A comprehensive anthropometric data set of 4082 men (Gordon, CC., et.al., 2014) was used to characterize a HA population. Obese and HA participants were classed as BMI ≥30 however HA participants were identified by applying anthropometric ratios indicative of lower body fat, namely “waist to height” (i.e. WHtR <0.6) and “waist to hip” (i.e. WHpR <0.9).Introduction
Method
