Patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) affects 32% men and 36% women over the age of 60years and is associated with anterior knee pain, stiffness, and poor mobility. Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is a bone-sparing treatment for isolated PFOA. This study set out to investigate the relationship between patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) and measurements obtained from gait analysis before and after PFA. There are currently no studies relating to gait analysis and PFA available in the literature A prospective cohort study was conducted of ten patients known to have isolated PFOA who had undergone PFA compared to a gender and age matched control group. The patients were also asked to complete questionnaires (Oxford knee score (OKS), EQ-5D-5L) before surgery and one year after surgery. Gait analysis was done on an instrumented treadmill comparing Ground reaction force parameters between the control and pre and post-operative PFA patients The average age 60 (49–69) years with a female to male ratio of 9:1. Patient and healthy subjects were matched for age and gender, with no significant difference in BMI. Post-op PFA improvement in gait seen in ground reaction force at 6.5km/h. Base support difference was statistically significant both on the flat P=0.0001 and uphill P=0.429 (5% inclination) and P=0.0062 (10% inclination). PROMS response rate was 70%(7/10) pre-operative and 60%(6/10) post-operative. EQ-5D-5L scores reflected patient health state was better post-operatively. This study found that gait analysis provides an objective measure of functional gait and reflected by significant quality-of-life improvement of patients post PFA. Literature lacks studies relating to gait-analysis and PFA. Valuable information provided by this study highlights that PFA has a beneficial outcome reflected by PROMs and improvement in vertical ground reaction force and gait Further research is needed to assess how care-providers may use gait-analysis as part of patient care plans for PFOA patients.
A risk factor for patellofemoral instability is trochlear dysplasia. Trochleoplasty is a surgical procedure used to reshape the trochlear groove to improve patellar stability. This study seeks to compare pre-op MRI measurements and post operative MRI measurements for patients who have undergone trochleoplasty in correlation with their clinical outcomes scores. Data was collected from a database of patients known to have trochlear dysplasia who underwent trochleoplasty. Radiological Data was collected pre-op and subsequent post op MRI data collected included TT-TG, Patella Tilt, IS, sulcus angle. Data score sheets pre-op and post op trochleoplasty completed by patients were also collected. 10 patients had pre and post op MRI's documented. 80%(8/10) females and 20%(2/10) males, average age of 30 years old (range 23 – 32 years old). Average MRI pre-op scores: IS ratio: 1.2, Patella tilt: 24.14, sulcus angle 160.13, and TT-TG distance of 16.94. 1 year average MRI post-op scores: IS ratio: 1.28, Patella tilt 15.56, sulcus angle 148.66 and TT-TG distance 16.78. 1 year post op Kujala and Norwich instability scores patient reported improved stability, function and confidence post op compared to pre-op. Subjective and objective scores reflected an improvement of stability. MRI demonstrated a deeper trochlear groove post-operatively which should provide resistance against lateral patella movement and patellar dislocations. TT-TG pre and post op remained constant. Pre op and post op Kujala scores reflected improved function. The Norwich instability scores pre and post op reflected satisfaction of treatment. There are not a lot of studies published on trochleoplasty. Based on this study it is clear that patients with patellofemoral instability with severe trochlear dysplasia will benefit from trochleoplasty. The sample size of the data analysis was only 10. However it reflected that function 1 year post procedure remained stable.
Optimising post-operative joint function is challenging when treating periarticular soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Radiotherapy reduces local recurrence rates but periarticular fibrosis may adversely affect joint function. Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy requires lower doses and smaller treatment volumes and therefore has potential benefits for the management of periarticular STS, but may lead to an increased risk of post-operative wound complications. This study assesses initial outcome and complications after treatment with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery for patients with periarticular STS. 17 patients treated with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery were identified. 3D conformal radiotherapy was delivered at a single centre with a dose of 50Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Patients were assessed weekly for adverse effects. Resection was planned 4–6 weeks after radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 5–44 months). No patients had significant adverse effects during radiotherapy. One patient had surgery delayed due to local skin reaction. Minor complications in five patients (three superficial infections, one seroma, one neuropraxia). One patient required further surgery due to incomplete margins. TESS scores for upper and lower limb patients were 86.1 and 78.1 respectively. No cases of local recurrence have occurred to date. Two patients have developed distant metastatic disease. The early results for periarticular STS managed with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery are excellent. There does not appear to be a significant increase in post-operative complication rates. With neo-adjuvant radiotherapy. Long term follow-up is required to demonstrate final functional outcome and local control rates.
