Steroid injections are used for subacromial pain syndrome and can be administered via the anterolateral or posterior approach to the subacromial space. It is not currently known which approach is superior in terms of improving clinical symptoms and function. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the clinical effectiveness of a steroid injection given via the anterolateral or the posterior approach to the subacromial space. The Subacromial Approach Injection Trial (SAInT) study is a single-centre, parallel, two-arm RCT. Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 basis to a subacromial steroid injection via either the anterolateral or the posterior approach to the subacromial space. Participants in both trial arms will then receive physiotherapy as standard of care for subacromial pain syndrome. The primary analysis will compare the change in Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at three months after injection. Secondary outcomes include the change in OSS at six and 12 months, as well as the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH), and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (RAND) at three months, six months, and one year after injection. Assessment of pain experienced during the injection will also be determined. A minimum of 86 patients will be recruited to obtain an 80% power to detect a minimally important difference of six points on the OSS change between the groups at three months after injection.Aims
Methods
Snapping scapula symptoms occur due to disruption of the smooth gliding motion between scapula and thoracic cage. Patients present with pain in the scapulothoracic area aggravated by overhead and repetitive shoulder movements. It is often associated with audible and palpable crepitus, clicking, crunching, grating or snapping sensation. Open or arthroscopic scapulothoracic surgical treatment is an option when non-operative treatment modalities fail. The aim of our study was to assess the outcome of scapulothoracic arthroscopic treatment in patients with painful snapping scapula. Eight patients underwent scapulothoracic arthroscopic treatment for painful snapping scapula. Pre-operatively, all these patients had a trial of conservative treatment modalities for at least 6 months, consisting of activity modification, analgesia and physiotherapy for restoration of normal scapulothoracic kinematics. All patients had a temporary pain relief following a local anaesthetic and steroid injection. We graded the crepitus from 0 to 3 - 0 being no crepitus, 1 being palpable but not audible crepitus, 2 being soft audible crepitus and 3 being loud crepitus. Operations were performed with the patients in either prone or semi-prone position. The arm was placed in the “chicken wing” position (arm in full internal rotation with the hand placed on the back), so that the scapula lifted up from the chest wall. Two portals along the medial border of scapula were used for arthroscopy and instrumentation. In two cases a superior portal was also used. Outcome was assessed by pre and postoperative visual analogue score (VAS) and Oxford Shoulder Score. Pre and postoperative scores were compared using paired t-test. The significance level was set at P <. 05.Introduction
Methods
