The COVID-19 virus is a tremendous burden for the Italian health system. The regionally-based Italian National Health System has been reorganized. Hospitals' biggest challenge was to create new intensive care unit (ICU) beds, as the existing system was insufficient to meet new demand, especially in the most affected areas. Our institution in the Milan metropolitan area of Lombardy, the epicentre of the infection, was selected as one of the three regional hub for major trauma, serving a population of more than three million people. The aims were the increase the ICU beds and the rationalization of human and structural resources available for treating COVID-19 patients. In our hub hospital, the reorganization aimed to reduce the risk of infection and to obtained resources, in terms of beds and healthcare personnel to be use in the COVID-19 emergency. Non-urgent outpatient orthopaedic activity and elective surgery was also suspended. A training programme for healthcare personnel started immediately. Orthopaedic and radiological pathways dedicated to COVID-19 patients, or with possible infection, have been established. In our orthopaedic department, we passed from 70 to 26 beds. Our goal is to treat trauma surgery's patient in the “golden 72 hours” in order to reduce the overall hospital length of stay. We applied an objective priority system to manage the flow of surgical procedures in the emergency room based on clinical outcomes and guidelines. Organizing the present to face the emergency is a challenge, but in the global plan of changes in hospital management one must also think about the near future. We reported the Milan metropolitan area orthopaedic surgery management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our decisions are not based on scientific evidence; therefore, the decision on how reorganize hospitals will likely remain in the hands of individual countries.

Introduction A complex challenge to trauma surgeon is the choice of clinical pathway management in hemodynamic unstable patients with pelvic ring disruption and potential intraperitoneal or other extrapelvic hemorrhage.

Aim of the study In multi-trauma bleeding patients with pelvic ring injuries causing increased pelvic volume, the main source of hemorrhage is the fracture itself; in biomechanical stable the priority is to search and to treat extrapelvic sources of hemorrhage; CESCT is critical in the selection of appriopriate therapeutic approach in the case of bleeding pelvic injury.

Material and Methods Patients admitted as major trauma are immediately evaluated by a multidisciplinary team in a dedicated room where ABC resuscitation, plain radiographs, abdominal ultrasound/DPL may be all performed. The comprehensive Tile pelvic disruption classification combines the mechanism of injury and the degree of pelvic stability. Previous works correlated pelvic fracture pattern with the risk of pelvic fracture hemorrhage. Classically, APC and VS mechanisms were associated with pelvic hemorrhage and LC mechanims with abdominal organ injuries. In this work we included in group A patterns of pelvic fracture where increased pelvic volume and major ligamentous disruption (Tile B1, B3 and C or APC and VS), Patterns of pelvic fractures with low risk of bleeding, such as those without ligament lacerations (Tile A) or with reduced pelvic volume (Tile B2 or LC) or isolated acetabular fractures, have been included in group B.

Results Between October 2002 and January 2004, significant bleeding was observed in 87 of 142 pelvic fractures (61.26%).

Thirty-seven of 87 (42.5%) had a pelvic fracture pattern attributable to group A and 50 to group B

All patients included had multiple sites of bleeding, but predominant hemorrhage from pelvic fracture was observed in 87% of group A patients and in only 6% of group B, while predominant hemorrhage from extra-pelvic sites was identified in 94% of group B and in only 13% of group A (p< .001).

Conclusion Pattern of pelvic seems to be suggestive of the predominant site of bleeding; early application of measures of temporary pelvic stabilization should be considered a completion of resuscitation protocol; CESCT is the best diagnostic tool to choice the appropriate way to manage bleeding pelvic injuries and associated intraperitoneal injuries; availability of equipped CT scan and angiographic suitesand of short response time interventional radiologist is a crucial point for this diagnostic and therapeutic work-up.