Our aim was to review the short-term clinical results of a single-institution cohort undergoing opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). We undertook a prospective clinical and radiographic review of our cohort of patients who had undergone opening wedge HTO for varus malalignment. The Cincinnati scoring system was used for objective assessment. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were evaluated and Blackburne-Peel (BP) and Insall-Salvati (IS) ratios recorded, as well as integrity of the lateral hinge. We reviewed 55 knees (51 patients: 34 men and 17 women; mean age, 44.2years; range 34–58years) followed up for a minimum 12 months (range, 12–62months). All patients had relief of pain, but six met our criteria of failed treatment where either revision fixation was required or proceeded to total knee arthroplasty for persisting symptoms. Cincinnati scores were 94.5% excellent (52/55) and 5.5% good (3/55) at 1 year, whilst at last follow-up they were 87.2% excellent (48/55), 9.1% good (5/55) and 3.6% fair (2/55). There was a significant improvement in mean American Knee Society score at 1 year and maintained at last follow-up (p<
0.05). Radiographically the lateral hinge was noted to be breached in 9.1% (5/55), but no incidence of non-union was identified. There was no significant change in IS index, however BP index diminished by a mean 15.3% (range, 7.4–28.2%). Medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy results in patellar infera, but successful clinical and functional outcomes have been demonstrated. The fact ther e is inconsistency between the two indices assessing patellar height ratio we believe reflects the inherent variability in the techniques employed. Distalisation of the tibial tubercle will mean the IS ratio remains unaffected, whilst the BP index more accurately demonstrates the lowering of patella relative to the joint line. However there may be other factors which are not immediately appreciated, such as changes in the tibial inclination or antero-posterior translation.
Our aim was to review the short-term clinical results of a single-institution cohort undergoing opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). We undertook a prospective clinical and radiographic review of our cohort of patients who had undergone opening wedge HTO for varus malalignment. The Cincinnati scoring system was used for objective assessment. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were evaluated and Blackburne-Peel (BP) and Insall-Salvati (IS) ratios recorded, as well as integrity of the lateral hinge. We reviewed 55 knees (51 patients: 34 men and 17 women; mean age, 44.2years; range 34–58years) followed up for a minimum 12 months (range, 12–62months). All patients had relief of pain, but six met our criteria of failed treatment where either revision fixation was required or proceeded to total knee arthroplasty for persisting symptoms. Cincinnati scores were 94.5% excellent (52/55) and 5.5% good (3/55) at 1 year, whilst at last follow-up they were 87.2% excellent (48/55), 9.1% good (5/55) and 3.6% fair (2/55). There was a significant improvement in mean American Knee Society score at 1 year and maintained at last follow-up (p<
0.05). Radiographically the lateral hinge was noted to be breached in 9.1% (5/55), but no incidence of non-union was identified. There was no significant change in IS index, however BP index diminished by a mean 15.3% (range, 7.4–28.2%). Opening wedge HTO provides a means of relieving stress distribution through the medial tibiofemoral compartment and results in effective relief of symptoms with improvement in functional outcome and quality of life.