To propose a modified approach to measuring femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index while still abiding by its definition and biomechanical basis, and to compare the reliabilities of the two methods. To propose a classification for medial sourcil edges.

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients treated with periacetabular osteotomy and/or hip arthroscopy. A modified FEAR index was defined. Lateral center-edge angle, Sharp's angle, Tonnis angle on all hips, as well as FEAR index with original and modified approaches were measured. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were calculated as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for FEAR index with both approaches and other alignments. A classification was proposed to categorize medial sourcil edges. ICC for the two approaches across different sourcil groups were also calculated.

After reviewing 411 patients, 49 were finally included. Thirty-two patients (40 hips) were identified as having borderline dysplasia defined by an LCEA of 18 to 25 degrees. Intra-observer ICC for the modified method were good to excellent for borderline hips; poor to excellent for DDH; moderate to excellent for normal hips. As for inter-observer reliability, modified approach outperformed original approach with moderate to good inter-observer reliability (DDH group, ICC=0.636; borderline dysplasia group, ICC=0.813; normal hip group, ICC=0.704). The medial sourcils were classified to 3 groups upon its morphology. Type II(39.0%) and III(43.9%) sourcils were the dominant patterns. The sourcil classification had substantial intra-observer agreement (observer 4, kappa=0.68; observer 1, kappa=0.799) and moderate inter-observer agreement (kappa=0.465). Modified approach to FEAR index possessed greater inter-observer reliability in all medial sourcil patterns.

The modified FEAR index has better intra- and inter-observer reliability compared with the original approach. Type II and III sourcils accounts for the majority to which only the modified approach is applicable.

This retrospective study was to investigate radiographic and clinical outcomes in treatment of hip instability in children and young adults undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) with or without femoral osteotomy.

19 patients (21 hips) with CP were treated with PAO with or without femoral osteotomy The mean age was 16.2 years old (7 to 28 years). Five patients (5 hips) received PAO, Six patients (7 hips) PAO with femoral derotation osteotomy, Eight patients (9 hips) PAO with varus derotational osteotomy (VDRO). Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and CT were taken to assess the migration percentage (MP), lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), Sharp angle, femoral neck anteversion, neck-shaft angle. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) was assessed pre- and post-surgery. Complications were recorded. The mean follow-up time was 41.2 months (range, 24 to 86 months).

All hips but one were pain free at final visit. The GMFCS improved by one level in 10 of 19 patients. MP improved from a mean of 76.6% to 18.6% at the final follow-up(p<0.001). The mean pre-operative LCEA and Sharp angle were −33.5 ? and 35 ? respectively, improved to 21.5 ? and 11.8 ? at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). There were six patients (7 hips) had re-subluxation at latest follow-up. Nervus cutaneus femoris lateralis was impaired in four patients after surgery. There was no re-dislocation, AVN, or infections in this group.

Satisfactory clinical and radiologic results can be obtained by PAO with or without femoral osteotomy minor complications.

Objectives

Different criteria for assessing the reduction quality of trochanteric fractures have been reported. The Baumgaertner reduction quality criteria (BRQC) are relatively common and the Chang reduction quality criteria (CRQC) are relatively new. The objectives of the current study were to compare the reliability of the BRQC and CRQC in predicting mechanical complications and to investigate the clinical implications of the CRQC.

We investigated the preliminary results of femoral head necrosis treated by modified femoral neck osteotomy through surgical hip dislocation in young adults.

33 patients with femoral head osteonecrosis received modified femoral neck osteotomy through surgical hip dislocation from March 2015. 14 patients who had minimal 12 months of follow-up were reviewed radiographically and clinically (mean follow-up:16 months, 12–36 months). The mean age of the patients 32 years at the time of surgery (ranged from 16 to 42years). There were 6 women and 8 men. The cause of the osteonecrosis was steroid administration in 6, alcohol abuse in 4, trauma in 3, and no apparent risk factor in 1. According to the Ficat staging system, 1 hips was stage II, 9 hips III, and 4 hips stage IV. The posterior or anterior rotational angle was 90–180° with a mean of 143°. Clinical evaluation was performed in terms of pain, walk and range of motion on the basis of Merle d'Aubigné hip scores: 17–18 points are excellent, 15–16 are good, 13–14 are fair, 12 or less are poor.

Recollapse of the final follow-up anteroposterior radiograph was prevented in 13 hips. One patient got 1 mm recollapse 18 months after surgery. No patient got progressive joint space narrowing. The Merle d'Aubigné score was excellent in 7 hips, good in 5, fair in 2.

The preliminary results suggest that modified femoral neck osteotomy through surgical hip dislocation is in favor of young patients. But longer term follow-up is necessary.