In this paper the results of correction of bone deformities using the llizarov methods, are presented.

Fifty-nine patients, 42 with malunion and 17 with mal-nonunion of tibia or femur were operated upon using the llizarov circular fixator. Another 28 cases were corrected using a unilateral device. There were: a) 30 angular deformities, 18 of which were combined with shortening, b) 21 angular deformities associated with translation and c) 36 complex, deformities including angulation, translation, shortening and malrotation.

Two rings above and two below the apex of the deformity were always required. Different types of hinges were used between them, depending on the type of the deformity. The corticotomy was performed at the apex of the deformity for the majority of the cases. In 18 patients with hypovascular and eburnated bone, or bone covered with soft tissue of poor quality, the corticotomy was done more proximal or more distal to the apex of the deformity. In complex deformities the correction sequence was: 1) correction of angulation and shortening simultaneously, 2) correction of rotation, 3) and finally correction of translation. The true plane of the deformity and the plane of placement of the hinges were determined by a computerized formula that we developed.

The deformities were corrected in all cases in which the hinges were placed at the correct position but in 5 cases we had to re-orient the hinges in order to achieve the correction. The corticotomy or pseudarthrosis consolidated in all cases. Residual leg length discrepancy remained in three patients, not exceeding 135 cm. Great care was taken to prevent complications during operation as well as during the post operative period. However, there were numerous obstacles, problems and true complications. All these were managed aggressively as soon as they appeared. The final results were very satisfactory.

We conclude that the revolutionary llizarov methods can solve bone deformity problems that cannot be faced by the traditional methods. It is critically important to place the hinges at the correct position in order to achieve the desired correction. Our computer program definitely helps to this purpose. The surgeon must always be vigilant in order to prevent complications and to deal with them immediately.

Introduction. We present the results of the management of irreducible dislocation or fracture / dislocation of the elbow using the “Orthofix” external fixator in cases where the condition of the soft tissues was contraindicated for extensile surgical approaches or the internal fixation would not be stable enough to permit safe joint mobilization postoperatively.

Materials and methods. Twelve (12) patients were treated using elbow external fixation,5 with supracondylar fracture and severe osteoporosis and 7 with fracture / dislocation of the elbow and excessive soft tissue impairment (two of them with open fracture). For the patients with fracture, we performed minimal internal fixation using small incisions and minor soft tissue detachments and then we applied the elbow external fixator for the neutralization of the fixation. This permitted the immediate active assisted joint mobilization postoperatively without interfering with the stability of the joint and of the fixation. The same happened for the patients that their elbow remained unstable after reduction of traumatic dislocation, where the external fixation maintained the reduction of the joint. Prerequisite for the safe mobilization of the joint was the application of the external fixation at the center of rotation of the elbow which is the transepicondylar axis, in order to comply with the biomechanics of the joint.

Results. The fixator was applied for a mean of 10 weeks (6 – 16 weeks). All the fractures united and no instability of the joint was noted. The range of motion was between useful limits with lack of extension less than 30 degrees and flexion more than 130 degrees, pronation 60 degrees and supination 55 degrees (mean values). Pin track infection was presented in 3 patients and the treatment was local care and antibiotics. One patient had radial nerve palsy immediately after the operation, who recovered totally after four months without any treatment.

Conclusions. The external fixation of the elbow provides sufficient stability permitting the immediate mobilization of the joint postoperatively and in combination with the minimal soft tissue damage during the operation prevents the postoperative stiffness. It is a safe alternative solution when the condition of soft tissues around the elbow do not permit a thorough open procedure.