The aim of our study was to compare the clinical versus radiological diagnosis of patients suffering from a Morton's neuroma. Clinical assessments and pre operative radiological imaging of patients who underwent operative procedures for an excision of a Morton's neuroma were retrospectively compared. This review included 43 excised Morton's neuromas from 36 different patients over a period of 68 months, performed by one surgical team. The commonest clinical symptoms were those of pain or tingling on the plantar aspect of the affected webspace on direct palpation (100%), pain of weight bearing (91%) which was relieved by rest (81%) and pain on stretching the toes (79%). The most sensitive clinical sign was a Mulder's click. Our results showed that clinical assessment was the most sensitive method of diagnosing these neuromas (98%). All of our patients had at least one mode of radiological investigation. Ultrasonography was the commonest requested single imaging modality in our series. It was found to have a sensitivity of 90% (28/31). This imaging technique has the disadvantage of being operator dependant, as highlighted by the fact that one of our patients had a correct radiological diagnosis after a repeat ultrasound to the affected area was requested. Magnetic Resonance Image scan is a more expensive technique as it has the advantage of producing static reproducible images. As a single imaging modality, it was found to have a sensitivity of 92% (12/13) in our series. 3 patients had both imaging modalities; initial ultrasound failed to convincingly diagnose a neuroma in 2 cases and in the other case, the initial MRI did not show any pathology. In all these cases, the repeat imaging techniques confirmed the clinical diagnosis. We conclude that there is no absolute requirement for ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging in patients who clinically are suspected to have a Morton's neuroma, as the clinical examination was found to be the most sensitive method of diagnosis. We suggest that the two main indications for performing some form of imaging is (a) an unclear clinical assessment and (b) cases when more than one webspace appears to be affected. An ultrasound of the webspaces should be the radiological investigation of choice, followed by a magnetic resonance scanning if any uncertainty still remains.
Akins original description of his osteotomy did not describe the use of any metal work. Today the osteotomy is most commonly held and fixed with either a staple or screw. We describe the results obtained with a simple suture technique. Methods Data was collected prospectively on 125 patients undergoing an Akin osteotomy. 111 of the patients were female and 14 male. The average age at time of surgery was 49 years. 104 cases were in conjunction with We describe a quick, easy, implant free method of fixing the Akin osteotomy. There is no need for metalwork removal and in today's world of austerity and the current climate of widespread budget constraints we describe a cost effective method which is clinically just as effective as methods requiring a staple or screw.
Freiberg's disease is an uncommon condition of anterior metatarsalgia that involves the head of metatarsals. Avascular necrosis of the metatarsal head is thought to arise during puberty. Treatment is usually conservative and operative treatment reserved for cases that do not respond to these measures. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of ten patients who presented to our institution who did not respond to conservative methods. These patients were treated surgically with a previously undescribed operative technique involving microfracture of the metatarsal heads and reattachment of the cartilage flap.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Surgibone (Unilab R) is a dry bone graft substitute prepared from Canadian bovine bone. It contains hydroxyapatite and 20–29% protein. The manufacturer claims that it is biocompatible; does not lead to foreign body reaction and does not produce pyrogenic effects. We have used Surgibone routinely in revision joint replacement surgery over a 6-year period, to augment autograft in filling osseous defects in the acetabulum and proximal femur. 27 patients who received Surgibone have been reviewed to assess the degree of graft incorporation, any evidence of graft rejection or immunogenic reaction. One patient died and 2 were excluded from the study for early fixation failure. The remaining 24 were studied 6 months to 5 years post surgery. In 17 patients (71%) there was radiological appearance of complete incorporation of the bone graft within 6 months. In 3 of these patients the graft incorporated as early as 3 months. There were 7 failures (29%). 3 patients have no radiological evidence of graft incorporation up to 3 years post surgery, although 2 have a satisfactory clinical result. Another 3 patients appeared to have graft rejection, and at revision were found to have sterile pus around the graft. These patients had negative responses to skin patch test for allergy to Surgibone. The seventh patient suffered an MRSA deep infection of the prosthesis that resulted in removal of the implants 4 weeks post operatively. We conclude that the use of xenograft Surgibone in revision hip surgery leads to unacceptable incidence of failure. Although in the majority of cases good incorporation of the graft was observed, there has been a substantial incidence of graft rejection.