There is currently no standard follow up protocol for patients who have been diagnosed with and treated for high-grade osteosarcoma. We therefore investigated the possibility of creating a risk based follow-up protocol for patients with primary osteosarcomas.

313 patients diagnosed with primary osteosarcomas were studied. The identified risk factors for local recurrence included poor necrosis, inadequate margins and high risk tumour site in the bone. The risk factors for metastases were poor necrosis, inadequate margins, extra-compartmental stage and tumour size ≥5cm.

The risk of local recurrence and/or metastases within three years of diagnosis increases as the number of risk factors increase. Patients were grouped according to their number of risk factors. The cumulative risk of metastases for patients with 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 risk factors is 0%, 12%, 21%, 54% and 60% respectively (p=<0.0001). Risk of local recurrence for patients with 0, 1, 2 and 3 risk factors is 5%, 14%, 25% and 20% respectively (p=0.0025).

Our investigation shows that by grouping patients together according to their number of identified risk factors, it is possible to identify groups of patients that are most at risk. This information can be used to design an evidence based follow up protocol which would have important implications for clinical practice.

Background: There is currently no standard follow up protocol for patients who have been diagnosed with and treated for high-grade osteosarcoma. We therefore investigated the possibility of creating a risk based follow-up protocol for patients with primary osteosarcomas.

Methods: 313 patients diagnosed with primary osteosar-comas were studied. The identified risk factors for local recurrence included poor necrosis, inadequate margins and high risk tumour site in the bone. The risk factors for metastases were poor necrosis, inadequate margins, extracompartmental stage and tumour size ≥5cm.

Results: The risk of local recurrence and/or metastases within three years of diagnosis increases as the number of risk factors increase. Patients were grouped according to their number of risk factors. The cumulative risk of metastases for patients with 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 risk factors is 0%, 12%, 21%, 54% and 60% respectively (p=< 0.0001). Risk of local recurrence for patients with 0, 1, 2 and 3 risk factors is 5%, 14%, 25% and 20% respectively (p=0.0025).

Conclusion: Our investigation shows that by grouping patients together according to their number of identified risk factors, it is possible to identify groups of patients that are most at risk. This information can be used to design an evidence based follow up protocol which would have important implications for clinical practice.

Background & Methods: We reviewed the treatment of 311 patients with primary osteosarcoma treated at a specialist centre between 1995 and 2004. Of this number we identified 8 patients (2.5%) who had undergone inappropriate surgical treatment otherwise known as a ‘whoops’ procedure. These patients were studied to determine the impact of the whoops operations on their subsequent treatment and prognosis.

Results: The whoops procedure consisted of arthroscopic surgery in 3 patients, open reduction and internal fixation of pathological fractures in 2 patients, excision in 2 patients and curettage in 1 patient. The patients who had a whoops procedure were three times more likely to be male, older (median age 25 versus 16 years), had tumours in the lower extremities and were more likely to have amputation as primary local treatment (40% versus 25%). the rates of local recurrence and survival were similar in those with whoops procedures and without.

Conclusion: Whoops procedure is associated with increased risk of amputation and more extensive procedures but does not appear to affect the prognosis of the patient.