Implant choice was changed from cemented Thompson to Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) for treatment of displaced intra-capsular neck of femur fractures in University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, United Kingdom (a major trauma center), following the NICE guidelines that advised about the use of a proven femoral stem design rather than Austin Moore or Thompson stems for hemiarthroplasties.

The aim of our study was to compare the results of Thompson versus ETS hemiarthroplasty in Aintree.

We initially compared 100 Thompson hemiarthroplasties that were performed before the start of ETS use, with 100 ETS hemiarthroplasties.

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of patients' demographics (age, sex and ASA grade), intra-operative difficulties/complications, post op medical complications, blood transfusion, in-patient stay and dislocations.

The operative time was statistically significantly longer in the ETS group (p= .0067). Worryingly, the 30 days mortality in ETS group was more than three times higher in ETS group (5 in Thompson group versus 16 in ETS group. P= .011).

To corroborate our above findings we studied 100 more consecutive patients that had ETS hemiarthroplasty. The results of this group showed 30 day mortality of 8 percent. However the operative time was again significantly longer (p= .003) and there was 18 percent conversion to bipolar hemiarthropalsty. Moreover there was statistically significant increased rate of deep infection (7%, p = .03) and blood transfusion (27%, p = .007).

This we feel may be due to longer and more surgically demanding operative technique including pressurised cementation in some patients with significant medical comorbidities.

Our results raise the question whether ETS hemiarthoplasty implant is a good implant choice for neck of femur fracture patients. Randomised control trials are needed to prove that ETS implant is any better than Thompson hemiarthroplasty implants in this group of patients.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare hip movement between normal subjects and patients with a large Metal on Metal hip replacement, undertaking the task of retrieving an object from the floor.

Methods: An electromagnetic tracker was used to measure movement as subjects retrieved an object with flexed hips and straight knees. Measurements were taken from a control group of 10 subjects with bilaterally normal hips, and 10 subjects with unilateral hip replacement. Sensors were attached over the iliac crest and the mid-shaft of the lateral thigh. Data was collected as each subject repeated the movement 3 times. The tracker recorded data at 10 hertz, with an accuracy of 0.15 degree.

Results: For the normal group the mean hip flexion was 90.8 degrees (SD 20.1). For the arthroplasty group the mean flexion on the normal and operated sides were 74.0 (SD 21) and 72.7 degrees (SD 21) respectively. This was not significant (P= 0.83). However there was a significant difference in hip movement between the operated hips and those in the normal control group (P= 0.03).

For the bilaterally normal group the mean hip rotation was 2.9 degrees internal (SD 11.8). For the arthroplasty group the mean rotation on the normal and operated sides were 9.4 degrees external (SD 9.5) and 6.9 degrees internal (SD 13.9) respectively. In this group there was a significant difference between the normal and operated side (P= 0.02).

Discussion: This study has shown that patients with a unilateral hip replacement have no significant flexion difference between hips, when retrieving an object from the floor. However there was a significant difference compared to a control group with normal hips. A significant difference was also observed when comparing the rotation of an operated hip joint to the contra-lateral normal hip in the same individual.

Introduction: Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty are advised to minimise their hip flexion in the early postoperative phase, to reduce the risk of dislocation. One activity that requires hip flexion is picking an object up from the floor. The aim of this study was to investigate the amount of hip flexion required to perform this task, and to see if there is a difference between patients with small and large bearing total hip replacements.

Methods: Nineteen unilateral total hip replacement patients were recruited into the study. Nine had a small bearing (metal on plastic) implant and ten had a large bearing (metal on metal) implant. Each patient had a contra-lateral normal native hip, which provided a control for bilateral comparison.

An electromagnetic tracking system was used to measure the flexion in the operated and normal hip of each patient. Tracker sensors were placed on the iliac crest and the mid-lateral thigh. The patients were then asked to flex forward from a standing position to pick an object up off the floor. This movement was repeated 3 times. Flexion data was collected at 10Hz which was accurate to 0.15 degrees. Spinal flexion was not recorded during the task.

Patients were also asked to complete the Harris and Oxford Hip Score questionnaires to obtain qualitative data regarding their hip replacement.

Results: The mean peak flexion angles (degrees) for each group are given below:

Small bearing group:

Operated side: Peak flexion = 79.3

Comparing the small bearing group with the large bearing group, the peak difference was 6.6. This difference was non-significant with P = 0.43.

All patients reported good – excellent functional results when completing the Harris and Oxford Hip Scores.

Discussion: The investigation showed that picking an object up from the floor requires a peak hip flexion of approximately 80 degrees. This investigation found no significant difference between the normal and operated sides. This would suggest that a Total Hip Replacement restores the “normal” range of motion in a hip joint. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the small and large bearing hip implants.

Introduction: The anterior drawer test for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency, requires a subjective assessment of joint movement, as the tibia is pulled forward. The aim of this study was to objectively quantify this movement using a magnetic tracking device.

Materials and Methods: Ten patients aged 24 to 44 years were assessed as having unilateral ACL deficiency with conventional clinical tests. These patients were then re-assessed using a magnetic tracking device (Polhemus Fastrak). Patients had magnetic sensors attached around their femurs and tibias using elasticated Velcro straps. The Anterior Drawer test was then performed with the patient lying within range of the system’s magnetic source. The test was performed three times on the normal and injured knees of each patient, using a spring balance to apply a standard 20 lb (=89 N) force. During the tests, sensor position and orientation data was collected with an accuracy better than 1 mm and 1 degree, respectively. The data was sampled at 10Hz and stored on a computer for post-test analysis. This analysis deduced the tibial displacement resulting from each anterior drawer.

Results: During the anterior drawer test the supine patient’s knee is in 90 degrees flexion, with the foot planted on the examination couch. As the tibia is pulled anteriorly, it rotates upwards from the foot and the femur experiences a corresponding rotation from the hip. These complex coupled movements are best quantified in terms of absolute displacement of the tibia from the femur. In the normal knees, the mean displacement of the tibia from the femur was 4.2 mm (SD=1.6). In comparison the ACL deficient knees had a mean displacement of 6.3 mm (SD=2.9). This is 50 % more. A paired t test of this data showed a highly significant difference, with P = 0.005.

Conclusion: This study has quantified the movement produced during the Anterior Draw test for ACL deficiency. The tracker’s lightweight sensors caused minimal disturbance to the established clinical test. The system therefore provides objective measurement data to augment the clinicians subjective assessment.

Study Design: A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing surgery for prolapsed intervertebral disc.

Objective: To assess a patient’s ability to recall information discussed pre-operatively at the time of informed consent six weeks following surgery.

Subjects: Sixty-one consecutive patients undergoing discectomy for prolapsed intervertebral disc with follow up six weeks after surgery.

Outcome measures: Patients were assessed, using a pre-prepared questionnaire, to establish their understanding of disc surgery prior to signing a consent form. All information on the questionnaire had previously been given to the patient at the time of being put on the waiting list via a copy of the clinic letter to the general practitioner. If patients were unable to complete the questionnaire, they were then tutored using visual aids such as posters and models until they were able to answer the questions correctly. The consent form was then signed. Six weeks following surgery, patients were then asked the same questionnaire to establish their ability to recall the information discussed pre-operatively about disc surgery.

Results: Prior to tutoring, 20 % of patients were unable to recall that their symptoms were due to disc pathology and that surgery to remove the disc would relieve their symptoms. They were also unable to recall the success rate of surgery. Following surgery, only half of this group of patients could recall these facts. Only 32% of patients were able to recall two or more risk factors of surgery prior to tutoring. This improved to 45% following surgery. Pre- and post-operative questionnaire scores were analysed using a paired t-test. There was no statistical improvement in questionnaire scores long term following tutoring.

Conclusion: In this group of patients, extensive tutoring with the use of visual aids as an adjunct, does not statistically improve their ability to recall important information about surgery for prolapsed intervertebral disc and the risks associated with it.

Introduction and Aims: An important prognostic factor in neonatal brachial plexus injury is the timing of biceps recovery. Although the natural history is not clear, biceps recovery after three months has been used to predict universally poor long-term shoulder function. The absence of biceps function at three months has been adopted as an indication for early microsurgery, in an attempt to improve upper limb function. e

Method: Between 1980 and 1992, 170 patients with neonatal brachial plexus injury were entered into a prospective study, which recorded details of the birth and serial examinations. Patients were grouped according to the level of injury and timing of biceps return. Twenty-nine patients were observed to have absent biceps at three months. Twenty-eight of 29 patients were available for long-term review at an average of 11 years and one month (range 5yrs 7mths–16 years). At follow-up, patients answered a questionnaire, underwent muscle strength testing, sensory evaluation, and had their shoulder function graded according to Gilbert’s modification of the Mallet score. The level of injury and time of biceps return were compared to the final outcomes.

Results: The level of injury was C5/6 in 13/28 (46%), C5/6/7 in 5/28 (18%) and pan-plexus in 10/28 (36%), with a Horner’s syndrome in four patients. Of the 28 patients with absent biceps function at three months, biceps contraction was observed in 20 patients (71%) by six months. 13/13 C-5,6 patients, 3/5 C-5,6,7 patients, and 4/9 pan-plexus patients (0/4 of those with a Horner’s syndrome) regained biceps by six months. Twenty-two patients did not have plexus surgery, nine of these had subsequent shoulder surgery. At follow-up, 27 of 28 patients had at least anti-gravity biceps function. Patients who regained biceps function between three and six month had better scores for abduction (p=0.04), hand to neck (p=0.05) and hand to back (p< 0.001) than patients who regained biceps after six months. Patients with C-5, 6 lesions had better scores for external rotation (p=0.04), hand to neck (p=0.05), hand to mouth (p< 0.01) and hand to back (p< 0.001) than patients with pan-plexus lesions. Twelve of the 22 (55%) patients who did not have plexus surgery had Mallet class IV shoulders (good function). Of the C-5, 6 patients who did not have plexus surgery, 8/12 had class IV shoulders.

Conclusion: This study supports the associations between prolonged neurological recovery, more extensive level of injury and worse long-term shoulder function. In patients with C-5, 6 injuries and absent biceps function at three months, good shoulder function is common in the long-term without plexus surgery. This finding is important in considering the indications for and the results of early microsurgical intervention.

Purpose: Hand localisations predominate in Ollier disease. There have however been few studies devoted to this topic and the one report available only presented a few cases. Treatment of multiple enchondromatosis is sometimes discussed with the treatment of solitary enchondromas despite different recurrence behaviour and aggressiveness. A specific approach is indicated.

Material and methods: We present a retrospective series of 22 children treated for multiple enchondromatosis of the hand. One hand was involved in 11 and both hands in 11. We thus identified 246 enchondromas on 33 hands. One girl with Maffucci syndrome died at the age of six years due to angiosarcomatous degeneration of the leg.

Results: At diagnosis, mean age was six years nine months. Pain and pathological fractures were exceptional, observed in three patients. Overall hand function remained satisfactory. We performed surgery for 14 patients (mean age 8 yr 8 mo) due to increasing symptoms and tumour volume. Five patients required two operations and one a third. We thus performed 18 interventions on 37 hand bones (51 surgical procedures). Simple curettage was performed in 21 cases, combined with autologous cancellous grafting in 30 others. One finger had to be amputated due to aggressive recurrence. Radio-lucent residual lesions were found in 62% of the children at mean 19 months follow-up.

Discussion: Hand function remained satisfactory despite a worrisome radiographic aspect. The decision for surgery was basically made to improve the aesthetic aspect of the hand. Many surgical techniques have been proposed. In our experience, it is difficult to eradicate a treated lesion but grafting appears to be more effective than simple curettage.

Conclusion: Function remains good during growth, fractures are exceptional. Lesions stabilise at the end of growth. We have not observed any case of chondrosarcomatous degeneration in our series of paediatric patients. There is however a risk of malignant degeneration which should be suspected in the event of pain, increased tumour volume or pathological fracture.

Aim: To investigate the versatility of ßexible intramedullary nails (FIN) in the surgical treatment of forearm fractures in children. Methods: 28 children were treated using FIN for displaced forearm fractures over a period of 5 years. There were 18 boys and 10 girls. The mean age was 11.5 years and the mean follow up were 7.9 months. Two nails were used one each for radius and ulna. 12 children were operated for unstable displaced fractures, 14 were operated after failed initial reduction and 2 were operated for open fractures. 16 were nailed by closed method, 12 had mini open technique in cases of failed initial closed reduction. The nails were removed on an average of 6–8 months. Results: All the children achieved bony union in excellent position. The average time for union was 5.6 weeks. All but 2 patients had full range of movements and none had any functional difþculty. 3 children had transient hypo aesthesia in the area of superþcial radial nerve distribution and one child developed compartment syndrome which needed fasciotomy. There were no long term sequel. Conclusions: Use of FINs in paediatric forearm fractures should be encouraged when surgical intervention is needed. They are axially and rotationally stable. They are safe to introduce and remove at a later date. Their ßexibility allows remodelling of the fracture and growth of the long bones.

Aims:We sought to develop and validate a classiþcation system for assessing PFJ status prior to revision surgery. Methods: The classiþcation system grades the condition of the PFJ by describing both the patella bone stock and the patello-femoral tracking. The system was analysed for its reliability by assessing both intra- and inter-observer variability. From our database of 110 patients who underwent revision knee arthroplasty, 66 cases were selected at random. Each patient had both pre and post-operative radiographs to classify. 145 sets of radiographs, each set consisting of an AP, lateral and skyline patella view, were studied. Three clinicians graded all radiographs according to the classiþcation system on 2 separate occasions. These assessments were performed at least 6 weeks apart. The results were analysed by an independent observer who was blinded. Both intra- and inter-observer agreement was quantiþed using kappa values. Results: Inter-observer kappa values between observers A& B, B& C and C& A were 0.89, 0.96 and 0.82 respectively. Intra-observer kappa values were 0.94, 0.87 and 0.97 for the 3 clinicians. This indicates excellent levels of agreement. Conclusions: The proposed classiþcation system provides a convenient, spe-ciþc, descriptive and reproducible method of denoting PFJ status. Our system may be used to accurately communicate and compare PFJ characteristics. This will aid planning of surgical intervention and allow comparison of results and techniques in revision knee arthroplasty.

Aims: We reviewed 100 paediatric lateral condylar fractures of the elbow treated with k-wire þxation. We compared the complication rates of wires left percutaneous versus wires buried beneath the skin. Methods: 68 patients had wires left percutaneous and 32 patients had their wires buried. Fractures were classiþed as displaced or undisplaced. Lengths of time for Ôwires in situñ, limb immobilisation and follow up were recorded. All complications of treatment and outcomes were recorded. Results were analysed using Chi-square tests. Results: Buried k-wires stayed in situ longer than percutaneous wires (average 6.7 versus 4.9 weeks). Fracture types along with mean lengths of immobilisation and follow up were similar for both groups. In the Ôburiedñ group 6 (19%) patients wires migrated through the skin although only 1 (3%) case became infected. 1 (3%) patient developed an uncomfortable heterotrophic ossiþcation. In the Ôpercutaneousñ group 20 (29%) patients developed wire infection and/or granulation tissue requiring treatment. 3 (4%) of these cases severely compromised treatment. Delayed union requiring re-operation occurred in 1(1%) patient. Conclusion: Burying the wires after open reduction and þxation of lateral condylar fractures signiþcantly (p=0.0026) reduces the incidence of infection and overgranulation associated with the wires.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the Co-ordinate revision knee prosthesis (Depuy Ltd, Johnson and Johnson, Warsaw, In) between 1995–2001.

Methods: One hundred and thirty-three knees (126 patients) undergoing revision total knee replacement between 1995–2001 were followed up prospectively. Surgery was performed by one surgeon (senior author). The patients were scored pre-operatively and postoperatively with SF-12 and WOMAC score. Surgery was performed for aseptic loosening (92%) and infection (8%). The changes in SF-12 physical score and the WOMAC score between pre and post operation were significant (SF-12 p < 0.0018, WOMAC pain p< 0.0001, WOMAC stiffness p< 0.0001, WOMAC Function p< 0.0001)). The prosthesis produced reliable relief of pain and improved range of movement with minimal complications.

Conclusion: This modular knee revision system produced satisfactory results in dealing with bone loss and instability in the medium term.