The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of post-operative anterior knee discomfort after anterograde tibial nailing by suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches.

95 subjects presenting with a tibial fracture requiring an intramedullary nail were randomised to treatment using a suprapatellar (SP) or infrapatellar (IP) approach. Anterior knee discomfort was assessed at 4 months, 6 months and 1 year post operatively using the Aberdeen Weightbearing Test-Knee (AWT-K), knee specific patient reported outcome measures and the VAS pain score. The AWT-K is an objective measure which uses weight transmitted through the knee when kneeling as a surrogate for anterior knee discomfort.

53 patients were randomised to an SP approach and 42 to an IP approach. AWT-K results showed a greater mean proportion of weight transmitted through the injured leg compared to the uninjured leg when kneeling in the SP group compared to the IP group at all time points at all follow-up visits. This reached significance at 4 months for all time points except 30 seconds. It also reached significance at 6 months at 0 seconds and 1 year at 60 seconds.

We conclude that the SP approach for anterograde tibial nailing reduces anterior knee discomfort post operatively compared to the IP approach.

Introduction

Several clinical and radiological studies have confirmed the benefits of using Volar Locking Plates (VLPs) to treat unstable distal radius fractures. The “theoretical” advantage of VLPs compared to standard plate fixation is that VLPs, through their design, intrinsically provide angular stability for most fracture configurations including comminuted fractures and, quite possibly, osteoporotic fractures. However few studies have compared the clinical results of patients of different ages who have been treated using VLPs.

Volar Locking Plates (VLP) have revolutionised the treatment of distal radius fractures allowing the anatomic reduction and stable fixation of the more comminuted and unstable of fractures. The benefits of this in terms of range of movement (ROM), pain and earlier return to work and daily activities is documented. However we were interested in was what improvements in wrist function patients made from 6 to 12 months after injury?

Due to its popularity of intramedullary nails (IMN) high success rate, newer design (titanium) IMN system have been introduced to replace stainless steel system. However the stability provided by the titanium IMN

may not be adequate, there by influencing the union rate.

We aimed to compare the results of both IMN systems via prospective clinical study and biomechanical testing using RSA.

Despite the variety of implants or techniques that exist to treat displaced distal radial fractures, the majority fail to provide sufficient stability to permit early functional recovery. However, locking plates have the advantage over other implants in that locking screws add considerably to the overall stability.

The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcome of patients with displaced distal radial fractures treated with a volar distal radial locking plate (Synthes).

During a two year period, details of 98 patients admitted to our unit with inherently unstable dorsally displaced distal radial fractures treated with volar locking plates were collected prospectively. For the purpose of this analysis, only those patients (55) with unilateral fracture, able to attend the study clinic at 6 months post-injury were considered. Patients were immobilised in wool and crepe for a 2 week period.

The group consisted of 15 males and 40 females with an average age of 54 (28 to 83). At 6 months, patients' perceived functional recovery averaged 80%. Objective assessment was considered in relation to the uninjured side: grip strength 73%; pinch strength 83%; palmarflexion 77%, dorsiflexion 80%; radial deviation 74%; ulnar deviation 74%; pronation 93%, and supination 92%. Seven patients complained of symptoms relating to prominent metalwork.

Good/excellent early subjective and objective functional recovery was made following open reduction and internal fixation using volar locking plates of dorsally displaced distal radial fractures. We suggest that objective assessment of grip strength and dorsiflexion can be used as a measure of patient perception of function.

Introduction: In recent years both patients and clinicians have benefitted from using volar locking plates (VLPs) to treat otherwise difficult to stabilise displaced distal radius fractures. However, it is not clear whether the newer VLP systems offer real clinical advantages over the original systems. AIM: To assess the clinical outcome of patients treated using two VLP systems.

Methods: Two cohorts of patients treated with a distal radius VLP were assessed prospectively by an independent assessor at 6 months following surgery using Visual Analogue Scales (pain & function), range of movement, grip and pinch strength. Complications were also recorded. 68 patients treated with the original Synthes VLP and 51 with a Periloc VLP (Smith & Nephew) were available for clinical review. There were no differences in patient demographics or injury types between the groups.

Results: Treatment with both VLP systems resulted in good or excellent clinical outcomes for both patient groups. Using either the median or the mean results, there were no differences between either of the VLP groups with respect to pain, subjective function, grip or pinch strength, palmar flexion, dorsiflexion, radial or ulnar deviation, or forearm rotation. The complication rates were also very similar, the most common problem relating to prominent metal work necessitating removal after fracture healing in 7 – 9% of out patients. Conclusion: VLPs are excellent implants for restoring wrist function and reducing longterm symptoms. The potential advantages of the newer generation of VLPs over the simpler original VLP designs remain unproven.

In recent years volar locking plates (VLP) have revolutionised the treatment of more complex distal radial fractures, but doubt still exists as to whether this is an operation for all suitably qualified orthopaedic surgeons, in particular experienced trainees, or remains the domain of consultants or better still upper limb surgeons.

Aims: To assess changes in a Level 1 Trauma Unit’s practice over a 5 year period and to compare the clinical outcomes of patients operated upon by experienced orthopaedic trainees and consultant surgeons.

Methods: Two prospective cohort studies were undertaken using (a) the Synthes VLP (January 2003–January 2005), and (b) the Periloc (Smith & Nephew) VLP (January 2007–February 2008). All patients were assessed at 6 months following surgery for range of movement, grip and pinch strength, and subjective levels of pain and function using Visual Numerical Scales. 65 and 36 patients were available for 6 month review in the Synthes and Periloc groups respectively. Operations undertaken by, or assisted directly by, the consultant were considered to be ‘consultant’ procedures, with all others being undertaken by trainees.

Results: No significant patient demographical differences, or differences in fracture type were identified for the two cohorts. Clinical outcomes for the two cohorts were likewise similar at 6 months although there was a suggestion that pain, pinch and grip strength were marginally better in the Periloc group although this was not statistically significant. In the Synthes VLP cohort, 32 operations were undertaken by consultants and 33 by trainees, compared with 9 and 27 operations being undertaken by consultants and trainees respectively in the Periloc group. Although there was a tendency for the more difficult fractures to be operated upon by consultants, especially in the earlier cohort, trainees were left to deal with many of the more complex injuries in the Periloc cohort. The incidence of minor complications requiring further surgery (all relating to prominent metalwork) was also low in both groups (7 in the first group and 2 in the second group) with all but one of the index operations having been performed by a trainee.

Discussion: Despite the complexity of many distal radial fractures, VLP treatment of distal radial fractures has become a common place procedure that, in our unit, are frequently left to experienced trainees to operate upon without supervision. Our prospectively cohort studies clearly show that, over time, experienced trainees obtain clinical results that are similar to their consultant colleagues with respect to clinical outcome and incidence of complications.

Conclusions: As our unit’s experience of treating patients with distal radial fractures with VLPs has grown, experienced trainees appear to obtain clinical results that are similar to consultants.

Despite advances in Locking Plate (LP) design, distal femoral fractures remain challenging injuries to treat especially in the elderly where approximately 15–30% develop nonunions secondary to failure of fixation.

Aim: To establish the mechanisms of nonunion in our patient population using two different LP systems.

Methods: Between December 2002-May 2008, we prospectively collected data on all 67 patients with distal femoral fractures who were treated using a suitable distal femoral LP (LISS, 35 cases, or Periloc, 32 cases). 72% of the patients were female; ages ranged from 25–94 years (ave. 67 years). Many of our patients had a number of significant co-morbidities.

Results: The presence of significant co-morbities e.g. Rheumatoid arthritis, long term systemic steroid use, cerebrovascular accidents resulting in ambulatory problems, previous major joint arthroplasty including ipsilateral knee replacements, paralysis, and severe dementia, did not appear to influence fracture union significantly. However, old age was strongly correlated with nonunion with all failed cases (7 patients - 10% of the study group) presenting with failure of fixation. 2 of the LP system failures resulted in malunion and the 5 other cases required revision surgery. Of note, all 7 patients were elderly, 6 being over 80 years of age. The mechanism of fixation failure was specific to each of the LP systems. All 4 of the failures treated with LISS, resulted from poor proximal stability as a consequence of unicortical screw fixation. Two patients required to have the proximal fixation revised through the insertion of bicortical screws which subsequently resulted in successful union. The other two patients were treated in long leg casts as the varus deformities were considered acceptable given each patient’s needs. All 3 of the failures who had been treated with a Periloc LP, resulted from fracturing of the plate at the metaphyseo-diaphyseal junction at the level of the main extra-articular component of the fracture. The plates all fractured through the unfilled screw holes, and all 3 patients required revision of fixation to bring about union.

Discussion: The LISS failures can all be attributed to poor proximal fixation that is associated with the use of unicortical screws in osteoporotic bone and confirms the need for bicortical screw fixation. However, modern LP systems manufactured from stainless steel offer increased implant stability that may in turn stress any fracture bridging segments of the LP.

Conclusion: Although we are aware of the importance of bicortical screws in osteoporotic patients, it is also seems likely that excessive plate rigidity should be avoided, by using long plates with well spaced out screws.

Aim: The use of volar plates in the management of distal radius fractures has increased dramatically over the last decade. Our aim was to ascertain if long term outcome could be predicted at clinical review four months following operation.

Patients and Methods: Between January 2003 and January 2005, all patients presenting with unilateral distal radius fractures and treated with volar locking plate fixation (Synthes) were invited to participate in long-term follow up. The decision to use a volar plate and the operative procedure itself was undertaken by the on-call consultant and his team. Patients who agreed to enter the study were evaluated at 4, 6 and 12 months following operation. Patient demographics, hand dominance and fracture type were recorded. Assessment of grip strength and wrist movements were undertaken and expressed as a percentage of the contralateral, uninjured side.

Results: A total of 76 out of 100 eligible patients agreed to participate in the study. Of those patients, 23 (30%) failed to attend all their follow-up appointments, leaving a dataset of 53 patients (70%) available for analysis. There were 28 females (53%) and the mean patient age was 55 years (range 28–83).

Grip strength, pinch grip, wrist flexion, wrist extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, pronation and supination all showed graded improvement in the year following fracture, achieving a mean range of 73% to 95% of function compared to the contralateral side at 12 months. Wrist flexion and ulnar deviation showed near maximum improvement by 6 months, whereas the other variables continued to show significant improvement between 6 and 12 months.

Logistic regression analysis suggested that improvement in wrist extension at four months was the best predictor of a good outcome at one year.

Discussion: Use of volar plate fixation is an increasingly common method of managing distal radius fractures. Our study suggests that good functional results can be achieved by this method of treatment. Failure to regain reasonable wrist extension by four months appears to predict higher risk of poor outcome and therefore patients in this group should be followed up more closely.

Aim: To assess the ability of volar locking plates to maintain fracture reduction when used to treat dorsally displaced extra and intra-articular distal radial fractures.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted over a 12 month period. Consenting patients who had sustained a closed, dorsally displaced distal radial fracture, treated by open reduction and internal fixation using a volar distal radial locking plate, were included in the study. Radial inclination, volar tilt and ulnar variance were measured from radiographs taken at least 3 months after surgery and compared with radiographs of the uninjured side. Only two of the eight participating surgeons have a specialist interest in upper limb surgery.

Results: Thirty-three patients were included in the study. There were 23 females and 10 males. The mean age was 49.5 years, range 26–82 years. According to the OTA classification there were 19 Type A, 1 Type B and 13 Type C fractures. The mean restoration of volar tilt was 1° of under-correction, median 1.1° under-correction with a range of 7.3° of under-correction to 3.7° of over-correction, when compared with the uninjured side. The mean restoration of radial inclination was 1.9° of under-correction, median 1.6° under-correction with a range of 10° of under-correction to 8.4° of over-correction. As a group the mean ulnar variance was 0mm with a range of 2mm of relative ulnar shortening to 3.5mm of ulnar prominence when compared with the uninjured side.

Conclusion: In the hands of general trauma surgeons, the volar approach combined with the application of a suitable volar locking plate is a good treatment for restoring and maintaining the anatomy of dorsally displaced intra and extra-articular distal radial fractures.

Aims: In recent years, volar locking plates have increased in popularity for the treatment of displaced distal radial fractures. The angular stability of the screws help maintain reduction permitting early mobilisation. The aim of this study was to assess functional outcome using both subjective and objective methods.

Methods: The study was a prospective cohort study. Over a 2 year period 110 patients with closed, displaced distal radial fractures were considered suitable for treatment with the distal radius volar locking plate. Of these, 51 patients were followed up for a full 12 months. One year post-operatively all patients were reviewed and both subjective and objective measurements made:

Subjective:

Pain – visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain ever).

For the purpose of this analysis, the fractures were divided into intra- and extra-articular fracture patterns based on the initial pre-operative X-rays.

Results: The mean age was 55 years (28 – 83), 36 were female and 15 male. Of the fractures, 26 were extra-articular and 25 intra-articular. 28 of the 51 patients had a period of physiotherapy post-operatively. 23 patients were either not referred to physiotherapy or failed to attend.

Subjectively 75% of patients had an excellent result with a pain VAS score of 0–1/10 (mean 0.9 for extra-articular and 1.2 for intra-articular) and an overall function VAS score of 9–10/10 (mean 92% for extra-articular and 86% for intra-articular).

Objective outcome measures were also very good. The results for the extra-articular group showed a mean grip strength of 85%, a mean pinch grip of 91%, a mean flexion of 82%, a mean extension of 88%, a mean pronation of 98% and a mean supination of 98%. The results for intra-articular fractures showed a mean grip strength of 80%, a mean pinch grip of 88%, a mean flexion of 78%, a mean extension of 83%, a mean pronation of 94% and a mean supination of 93%.

Conclusions: Overall patients made an excellent recovery. The majority of patients had little or no pain and almost complete return to function at 12 months post-operatively. Interestingly, individual patient demographics (age, sex, fracture type, physiotherapy) did not make a statistically significant difference to the outcome measures.

This study confirmed excellent functional results comparable with other methods of fixation for extra-articular fractures, but it also showed good results with the more complex intra-articular fractures.