Introduction

The continued improvement of ceramic materials for total hip arthroplasty led to the development of Zirconia and Zirconia toughened Alumina materials such as BIOLOX® delta. Zirconia exists in a tetragonal phase in new ceramic heads and can transform to a monoclinic phase in response to loading giving the material improved fracture toughness. It is known that surface transformation occurs in this material under hydrothermal conditions (i.e. in vivo condition), and ISO standards recommend parts are artificially aged prior to testing to include any effect of surface transformation on new designs. Accelerated aging procedures have been used to predict the amount of phase transformation that will occur in vivo, but validation of these models requires the study of retrieved hip joints. Here 26 BIOLOX® delta retrievals are analysed to determine the degree of phase transformation that occurs in vivo. The levels of phase transformation measured are compared with those predicted based on accelerated aging tests.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) can be artificially simulated ex vivo on healthy articular cartilage (AC) samples by use of proteolytic enzymes. In this article we will present preliminary analyses of the physical degradation of AC when subjected to alternating mechanical stresses. Since AC damage due to OA is believed to be mechanically induced, the first step towards the realisation of an improved understanding of degenerative behaviour of AC under physiological loading conditions is to perform ex vivo tests which mimic such conditions at best.

SUMMARY

We report a prospective study of clinical data collected pre, intra and post operation to remove both cup and head components of 118 failed, current generation metal on metal (MOM) hips. Whilst component position was important, the majority were unexplained failures and of these the majority (63%) had cup inclination angles of less than 55 degrees. Poor biocompatibility of the wear debris may explain many of the failures.

Introduction: The London Implant Retrieval Centre (LIRC) was founded to investigate the high incidence of unexplained failures of Metal-on-Metal (MoM) hips. A multidisciplinary team analyse the failed hips, investigations include CT and MRI scans, blood and synovial fluid tests, wear measurements, X-rays and clinical data from the explanting surgeons.

Wear measurements of 100 explanted hips have been carried out on a Taylor Hobson 365 Roundness Machine using the LIRC Wear Protocol. It was found that 50% of explanted cups were wearing less than 5 μm/year and 60% of components were wearing less than 10 μm/year. Wear tests on hip joint simulators predict wear rates between 2 and 8 μm/year. However, 6% of cups are wearing faster than 100 μm/year, with 16% of cups have wear patches deeper than 100 μm and that 4% have a wear patch deeper than 300 μm.

Discussion: This paper considers the common characteristics of components in this very high wearing category. Engineering parameters such as head/cup clearance, surface finish, form errors and head cup contact conditions are investigated. This is correlated with clinical data and other results from the LIRC.

Cup position is an important factor, all of the high wearing components are outside the Lewinick’s Box, however it is shown that mal position is does not always lead to extreme wear. Further analysis is taking place to calculate the size of the contact patch between head and cup (based on patient data and biomechanics) and the proximity of the contact patch to the edge of the cup.

Conclusion: The study of explanted components shows that 6% exhibit extreme wear, and although several “risk” factors can be identified, it is not clear why only a proportion of these components show extremely high wear rates. This is the subject of current investigation.

The Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip resurfacing arthroplasty has a failure rate of 12.0% at five years, compared with 4.3% for the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR). We analysed 66 ASR and 64 BHR explanted metal-on-metal hip replacements with the aim of understanding their mechanisms of failure. We measured the linear wear rates of the acetabular and femoral components and analysed the clinical cause of failure, pre-revision blood metal ion levels and orientation of the acetabular component.

There was no significant difference in metal ion levels (chromium, p = 0.82; cobalt, p = 0.40) or head wear rate (p = 0.14) between the two groups. The ASR had a significantly increased rate of wear of the acetabular component (p = 0.03) and a significantly increased occurrence of edge loading (p < 0.005), which can be attributed to differences in design between the ASR and BHR. The effects of differences in design on the in vivo wear rates are discussed: these may provide an explanation as to why the ASR is more sensitive to suboptimal positioning than the BHR.

We measured the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components in 45 patients (33 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 53.4 years (30 to 74) who had undergone revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. Three-dimensional CT was used to measure the inclination and version of the acetabular component, femoral version and the horizontal femoral offset, and the linear wear of the removed acetabular components was measured using a roundness machine.

We found that acetabular version and combined version of the acetabular and femoral components were weakly positively correlated with the rate of wear. The acetabular inclination angle was strongly positively correlated with the rate of wear. Femoral version was weakly negatively correlated with the rate of wear. Application of a threshold of > 5 μm/year for the rate of wear in order to separate the revisions into low or high wearing groups showed that more high wearing components were implanted outside Lewinnek’s safe zone, but that this was mainly due to the inclination of the acetabular component, which was the only parameter that significantly differed between the groups.

We were unable to show that excess version of the acetabular component alone or combined with femoral version was associated with an increase in the rate of wear based on our assessment of version using CT.

This study compared component wear rates and pre-revision blood metal ions levels in two groups of failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: hip resurfacing and modular total hip replacement (THR).

There was no significant difference in the median rate of linear wear between the groups for both acetabular (p = 0.4633) and femoral (p = 0.0872) components. There was also no significant difference in the median linear wear rates when failed hip resurfacing and modular THR hips of the same type (ASR and Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR)) were compared.

Unlike other studies of well-functioning hips, there was no significant difference in pre-revision blood metal ion levels between hip resurfacing and modular THR.

Edge loading was common in both groups, but more common in the resurfacing group (67%) than in the modular group (57%). However, this was not significant (p = 0.3479). We attribute this difference to retention of the neck in resurfacing of the hip, leading to impingement-type edge loading. This was supported by visual evidence of impingement on the femur.

These findings show that failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and modular THRs have similar component wear rates and are both associated with raised pre-revision blood levels of metal ions.

Data on retrieval analysis of current generation metal on metal hip replacements is scarce. Such analysis may help to reduce the incidence of failure and revision procedures. Our aim was to investigate the wear characteristics of explanted (ie failed) metal on metal (MOM) acetabular components in terms of; 1) wear rate; and 2) distribution of the wear (specifically edge loading).

30 hips were collected from 20 centres. The types of prostheses were: 15 BHR; 10 Cormet and 5 ASR. Wear of the acetabular components of the prostheses was measured using an out of roundness (Rondcom 60A) machine. We recorded the implantation and removal date of each hip.

The median linear wear rate was 7.32μm/year; this is at least 3 times greater than steady state wear rates reported for similar components worn in hip simulator studies. For 24 out of 30 cups, the greatest linear wear was recorded at the cup edge.

Failed metal-on-metal acetabular components were associated with higher than expected wear rates. The highest wear was seen closest to the cup edge in the majority of patients suggesting edge loading had occurred and probably explained the high wear rates. Accurate cup placement (to avoid edge loading) may reduce the failure of MOM hips.

Introduction: Approximately 0.5 % of patients with metal on metal hip replacements develop post operative pain which is thought to be due to an immune reaction to metal wear particles, known as Aseptic Lymphocyte Dominated Vasculitis Associated Lesion (ALVAL). Treatment usually requires revision to a non metal on metal hip.. Is the development of ALVAL more likely in those patients with high wear rates?

Methods: Retrieved Metal on Metal (MOM) hip implants; periprosthetic tissue and blood samples were obtained from patients (n = 18) undergoing revision for unexplained pain at a mean of 2 years post operatively. The following variables were measured:

linear wear rate (depth of the femoral head and acetabular socket wear patch/time from operation);

All implants and tissue samples were analysed against control samples from patients undergoing revision of MOM hips for fractured femoral neck or impingement.

Results: Linear wear rates of retrieved implants, and blood levels of cobalt and chromium from patients with unexplained plain were greater than from control patients. Histolopathological analysis of tissue showed dense inflammatory infiltrates with healthy looking endothelial cells in all vessels from both patient groups.

Discussion and Conclusion: A painful MOM hip was associated with high wear rates and blood metal levels. The local inflammatory response was similar to “ALVAL”, ie lymphocyte dominated, but not exclusive to those patients with unexplained pain. We question whether ALVAL represents a vasculitis, or merely a classical lymphocyte driven inflammatory tissue response to metal debris particles.