Internet delivered interventions may provide a route to rapid support for behavioural self-management for low back pain (LBP) that could be widely applied within primary care. Although evidence is emerging that more complex technologies (mobile apps linked to digital wristbands) can have some impact on LBP-related disability, there is a need to determine the effectiveness of highly accessible, web-based support for self-management for LBP. We conducted a multi-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial, testing ‘SupportBack’, an accessible internet intervention developed specifically for primary care. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of the SupportBack interventions in reducing LBP-related physical disability in primary care patients. Participants were randomised to 1 of 3 arms: 1) Usual care + internet intervention + physiotherapy telephone support, 2) Usual care + internet intervention, 3) Usual care alone. Utilising a repeated measures design, the primary outcome for the trial was disability over 12 months using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. Results: 826 were randomised, with follow-up rates: 6 weeks = 83%; 3 months = 72%; 6 months = 70%; 12 months = 79%. Analysis is ongoing, comparing each intervention arm versus usual care alone. The key results will be presented at the conference.Background
Methods and results
The acetabular labrum is an essential stabilizer of the hip joint, imparting its greatest effect in extreme joint positions where the femoral head is disposed to subluxation and dislocation. However, its stabilizing value has proved difficult to quantify. The objective of the present study was to assess the contribution of the entire acetabular labrum to mechanical joint stability. We introduce a novel “dislocation potential test” that utilizes a dynamic, cadaveric, robotic model that functions in real-time under load-control parameters to map the joint space for low-displacement determination of stability, and quantify using the “stability index”. Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric hips without labral tears were mounted to a six-degree-of-freedom robotic manipulator and studied in 2 distinct joint positions provocative for either anterior or posterior dislocation. Dislocation potential tests were run in 15° intervals, or sweep planes, about the face of the acetabulum. For each interval, a 100 N force vector was applied medially and swept laterally until dislocation occurred. Three-dimensional kinematic data from conditions with and without labrum were quantified using the stability index, which is the percentage of all directions a constant force can be applied within a given sweep plane while maintaining a stable joint.Background
Methods
Despite increasing scientific investigation, the best method for preventing post-operative deep vein thrombosis remains unclear in patients undergoing a total hip replacement. In the wake of the recent controversial National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Clinical Guidelines on the prevention of thrombo-embolism, we felt it was timely to survey current Scottish Surgeons thrombo-prophylactic practice when performing total hip replacements. E-mail questionnaires were sent to all Scottish Orthopaedic consultants. They were asked about routine pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Comparison was made with a previous survey done in 2003. The response rate was 75%. The survey showed an increased use of pharmacological prophylaxis from 93% to 100%. This was due to the increased use of aspirin, from 51% to 64%. The use of Low molecular weight heparin had remained the same at 51%. No surgeons routinely use Warfarin, low dose heparin or Fondaparinux. Use of graded compression stockings has increased from 59% to 70%. There is increasing evidence that patients undergoing total hip replacement should receive extended prophylaxis for up to 35 days. This could explain why aspirin is commonly used. Most guidelines, however, do not recommend this drug. With the recent launch of two new oral agents we may see a huge change in prophylaxis in Scotland, as 94% of surgeons said they would use extended prophylaxis if a safe oral agent was found.
