The most common treatment options for fixation of osteoporotic distal femur fractures are retrograde nails and locking plates. There are proponents of more elastic titanium plates as well as more rigid steel plates; No clear superiority of one over the other has been established. We aimed to evaluate the mechanical differences between stainless steel and titanium locking plates in the fixation of distal femur fractures in osteoporotic bone. We hypothesized that due to its higher elasticity titanium locking plates can absorb more energy and are therefore less likely to “cut” into the bone compared to stainless steel locking plates resulting in improved metaphyseal osteoporotic fracture fixation. We used eight matched pairs of osteoporotic fresh-frozen human cadaveric femurs (age >70 years, all female). Within each pair we randomized one femur to be fitted with a Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS-Titanium locking plate) and one with a Distal Locking Condylar Plate (DLCP-Stainless steel locking plate). A fracture model simulating an AO 33-A3 fracture was created (extraarticular comminuted fracture) and specimens were subsequently subjected to step-wise cyclic axial loading to failure. We used an advanced three dimensional tracking system (Polhemus Fastrak) to monitor the movement of the distal fragment relative to the real time distal plate position allowing us to evaluate distal implant cut-out.Introduction
Methods
