It is believed that wear of replacement joints A five active degree of freedom (DOF) spine simulator was used to compare the effects of varying the kinematic and loading input parameters on a ProDisc-L TDR (Synthes Spine). A four DOF standard ISO (ISO18192-1) test was followed by a five DOF test which included the AP shear force. The standard ISO test was repeated on a second simulator (of identical design) but with the phasing of the lateral bend (LB) and flexion extension (FE) motions changed to be in-phase, creating a low cross-shear motion pattern. The standard ISO test was then modified to give half the ISO standard axial loading. All tests conducted were based on the ISO18192-1 standard for lumbar implants with 15 g/l protein lubricant and modified as described. Gravimetric wear measurements were taken every million cycles (mc) in units of milligrams (mg). Six discs were tested to give statistically significant results.Introduction
Methods
The biological response to UHMWPE particles generated by total joint replacements is one of the key causes of osteolysis, which leads to late failure of implants. Particles ranging from 0.1-1.0μm have been shown to be the most biologically active, in terms of osteolytic cytokine release from macrophages [1]. Current designs of lumbar total disc replacements (TDR) contain UHMWPE as a bearing surface and the first reports of osteolysis around TDR in vivo have appeared recently in the literature [2]. The current wear testing standard (ISO18192-1) for TDR specifies only four degrees of freedom (4DOF), i.e. axial load, flexion-extension, lateral bend and axial rotation. However, Callaghan et al. [3] described a fifth DOF, anterior-posterior (AP) shear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect that this additional AP shear load component had on the size and morphology of the wear particles generated by ProDisc-L TDR devices over five million cycles in a spine simulator. A six-station lumbar spine simulator (Simulation Solutions, UK) was used to test ProDisc-L TDR components (Synthes Spine, USA) under the ISO 18192-1 standard inputs and with the addition of an AP load of +175 and −140N. Wear particles were isolated at 2 and 5 mc using a modified alkaline digestion protocol [4]. Particles were collected by filtration and imaged by high resolution FEGSEM. Particle number and volume distributions were calculated as described previously [4] and were compared statistically by one way ANOVA (p<0.05).Introduction
Methods
