Combined glenoid and humeral bone loss has been identified as an important factor in predicting recurrence after arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation. The “glenoid track” concept is proposed to predict recurrent instability by comparing the relative size of the glenoid to the humeral bone defect. The aim of this study was to investigate whether assessment of the glenoid track on a pre-operative MR arthrogram could be used to predict subsequent instability in a typical UK population.

A retrospective study was undertaken of 175 primary arthroscopic stabilisation procedures of which 82% (n=143) were men. The median age was 26 years (IQR 22 to 32, range 16 to 77). The median follow-up was 76 months (range 21 to 125). A pre-operative MR arthrogram was used to determine if the shoulder was on-track or off-track. The endpoint of recurrent dislocation was examined.

The prevalence of “off-track” bone loss in this group was 14.2% (n=25). There were 6 (24%) dislocations in the off-track group compared with 5 (3.33%) dislocations in the on-track group (RR 7.2, 95% CI 2.45 to 20.5, p=0.001). At 5 years, the cumulative redislocation rate was 26.1% in the off-track group compared with 8.7% in on-track group. The rate of any recurrent instability was 60% (n=15) v 18% (n=27) (RR 3.33, 95% CI 2.02 to 5.20, p<0.0001). Glenoid track (on v off) was not predicted by gender (p=0.411).

In a typical UK population assessment of the glenoid track on an MR arthrogram can be used to risk stratify patients with shoulder instability.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) provides a surgical alternative to conventional shoulder arthroplasty in the rotator cuff deficient shoulder. Short term data has shown consistent improvements in pain and function but higher complication and failure rates have also been reported. The aims of this study were to identify the early and late complications of RTSA, to establish the frequency of glenoid notching, and to assess the post-operative functional outcomes.

21 patients (22 joints) treated with RTSA at Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GRI) between April 2006 and October 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for surgery included cuff tear arthropathy, revision hemiarthroplasty and fracture malunion. Complication rates were obtained by analysis of follow up data from Bluespier and case notes. Glenoid notching was graded from x-rays by multiple observers using the Sirveaux classification. Outcome was assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and range of motion (ROM).

The complication rate associated with RTSA was 14.3%, effecting 3 patients. One dislocation and 1 ulnar nerve palsy occurred within 30 days post-op. A late complication was represented by 1 dislocation, which required revision. Glenoid notching occurred in 71.4% (15 of 21patients), though the majority had a low Sirveaux classification (grade 1 or 2). OSS increased post-operatively and showed a linear improvement with time (R² = 0.81) and ROM increased significantly post-op compared with pre-op (p<0.001).

The complication rate associated with RTSA at GRI was lower than that reported in literature and the outcome was good as defined by ROM and OSS. The rate of glenoid notching was higher than literature reports but the significance of this is unclear as notching may not be associated with loosening.

Aims

Isolated greater tuberosity fractures make up 17–21% of proximal humeral fractures, 30% are associated with shoulder dislocation. Conservative management of minimally displaced fractures (<5 mm) is recommended. There are few guides to which and how many fractures displace over time.

There is continued concern over complication rates (20–30% of cases) in locked proximal humeral plating. The most common sequelae of this is screw penetration of the humeral head. This is associated with natural settling of the fracture, malreducition in varus, insufficent medial support of the fracture. The proximity of the screws to the articular surface can also be influential on outcome if collapse occurs. Our operative technique is to establish the rotation of the humeral head where the drill appears closest to the articular margin (by sequential xray screening) and subtract from this to avoid intra-articular penetration of the humeral head.

55 Consecutive patients of average age 56.4 years (14.7–86.1), 17 male and 38 females, who underwent PHILOS plating were identified using Bluespier database. Xrays were analysed for fracture pattern, restoration of neck-shaft angle, plate positioning, number and configuration of screws and presence of screw penetration both intra-operatively and at postoperative follow-up.

There were 6.07 screws used per head (total 330). There was one intraoperative screw penetration and 3 patients had evidence of screw penetration at follow-up, which required implant removal (total screw penetration rate of 7%). There was one case of AVN. The mean neck shaft angle was 137 degrees (anatomical 135 degrees).

Accurate reduction of fractures and placement of screws in the humeral head using image intensifier can act to minimise risk of screw penetration and make some of the complications of locked proximal humeral plating avoidable.

This multi-centre single-blind randomised control trial compared outcomes in patients with acute displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures treated either by primary open reduction and plate fixation (ORPF), or non-operative treatment (NT).

Two-hundred patients were randomised to receive either ORPF or NT. Functional assessment was conducted up to one-year using DASH, SF-12 and Constant scores (CS). Union was evaluated using radiographs and CT.

Rate of non-union was significantly reduced after ORPF (1 following ORPF, 16 following NT, odds ratio=0.07, 95% CI=0.01–0.50, p=0.0006). 7 patients had delayed-union after NT. Group allocation to ORPF was independently predictive of development of non-union. DASH and CS were significantly better in the ORPF group 3-months post-surgery, but not at one-year (mean DASH = 6.2 after NT versus 3.7 after ORPF, p=0.09; mean CS = 86.1 after NT versus 90.7 after ORPF, p=0.05). Group allocation was not predictive of one-year outcome. Non-union was the only factor independently predictive of one-year functional outcome. There were no significant differences in time off work or subjective scores. Five patients underwent revision for complications after ORPF. 10 patients underwent metalwork removal. Treatment cost was significantly greater after ORPF (p=0.001). ORPF reduces rate of non-union compared with NT and is associated with better early functional outcomes. Improved outcomes are not sustained at one-year. Differences in functional outcome appear to be mediated by prevention of non-union from ORPF. ORPF is more expensive and associated with implant-related complications not seen with NT. Our results do not support routine primary ORPF for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures.

Locking plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures has demonstrated good results tempered by a significant rate of loss of fixation. Reported rates of failure are typically around 10% of cases but can be 20% or higher. In addition large series are often made up of a diverse patient population, so we have chosen to focus solely on patients confirmed to have significantly reduced BMD who can be considered a subset at high risk of fixation failure.

Twenty-three patients (5 male, 18 female) with a proximal humeral fracture treated by locking plate fixation were confirmed on DEXA scanning to be osteopaenic (17), osteoporotic (4) or severely osteoporotic (2). Patients early in the series were reviewed retrospectively and recalled for an updated assessment where appropriate, and the remainder were followed prospectively. The average age was 66 years (range 49 to 82). Follow up was for an average of nine months following surgery (range 2 and a half to 28 months). 17 patients underwent surgery for acute injuries and 6 for established surgical neck non-unions.

Seven injuries were 2-part fractures, 12 3-part, 3 were 4-part and one a 2-part surgical neck non-union.1 plate failed due to complete loss of fixation within 2 months in a patient with severe osteoporosis and was treated with removal of metalwork. This was the only injury that failed to unite. Avascular necrosis occurred in three patients with two revised to a hemiarthroplasty. 1 patient had ongoing pain and underwent removal of the plate.

Our series demonstrated that locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures is associated with a low rate of fixation failure and satisfactory outcomes in patients with significantly reduced bone mineral density.

Aims: Following hip fracture, a delay to surgery of greater than 24 hours is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality. In our unit, one of the common perceived delays is patients admitted on warfarin. The elective perioperative management of patients on warfarin is well documented. We aimed to define the incidence and delay of patients admitted with hip fractures on warfarin, and how its reversal was managed. Methods: Data was collected prospectively from 14 hospitals who contribute to the Scottish Hip Fracture Database. In addition to the data recorded on the Standardised Audit of Hip fractures in Europe form (SAHFE), specific questions relating to warfarin and its reversal were asked. Results: During 1.8.01–31.12.01, 1641 patients were admitted with a hip fracture, 42 patients (2.6%) were taking warfarin with the commonest indication being atrial fibrillation (40.5%). Mean INR on admission was 2.83 (range 1.2–8.2), and at surgery was 1.43 (range 1.0–2.0). Active reversal occurred in 19 patients. A delay to theatre of > 48 hours occurred in 72.7% of the warfarin group versus 19.0% in the non-warfarin group. There were wound complications in 5 patients taking warfarin. Conclusions: The number of patients admitted on warfarin was lower than we had anticipated. Delay to theatre was significantly higher in the warfarin group. The approach to the perioperative management of patients taking warfarin was varied.